Enculturative Continuity and the Importance of Caretakers: Cross-Cultural Codes

1982 ◽  
Vol 17 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 91-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald P. Rohner ◽  
Evelyn C. Rohner
Keyword(s):  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Cultural Codes

Political Organization: Cross-Cultural Codes 4

Ethnology ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Tuden ◽  
Catherine Marshall
Keyword(s):  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Political Organization ◽  
Cultural Codes

scholarly journals Language Personality in the Conditions of Cross-Cultural Communication: Case-Study Experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Nitza Davidovitch ◽  
Kateryna Khyzhniak
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Transformation ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Cultural Communication ◽  
Cross Cultural Communication ◽  
Cultural Codes ◽  
Study Experience ◽  
New Type ◽  
New Perspective ◽  
And Behavior ◽  
Value Measurement

The article is devoted to the problem of identification of a language personality’s traits under conditions of cross-cultural communication. It is shown that effective cross-cultural communication is revised under globalization and increasingly intensive social interactions. The results of the authors’ research prove that it is possible to develop a new perspective on the heuristic possibilities of the concept of language personality to ensure the effectiveness of cross-cultural communications.This applies above all to the understanding of culture, cultural codes, verbal, non-verbal communication and preverbal, development of value measurement and understanding, and behavior adoption patterns. We propose to identify a language personality as a nationally specific communicant type that has a culturally caused worldview and value system and is capable of cross-cultural transformation. We identified transitions from a “mono” language personality to a “multi” language personality. We offer communicative training as a way of resolving cultural gaps in communication.We insist that only a new type of a language personality can effectively integrate and communicate while taking into account cultural peculiarities. Language personality currently acquires multicultural traits resulting from two main types of mobility: virtual and physical. Empirical research shows that two types of mobility are widespread, with typical high demands for the study of an international communication language (English) and local culture (Hebrew).

Cross-Cultural Codes on Contributions by Women to Subsistence

Ethnology ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert Barry III ◽  
Alice Schlegel
Keyword(s):  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Cultural Codes

Agents and Techniques for Child Training: Cross-Cultural Codes 6

Ethnology ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert Barry III ◽  
Lili Josephson ◽  
Edith Lauer ◽  
Catherine Marshall
Keyword(s):  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Cultural Codes

Parental Acceptance-Rejection and Parental Control: Cross-Cultural Codes

Ethnology ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald P. Rohner ◽  
Evelyn C. Rohner
Keyword(s):  
Parental Control ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Parental Acceptance ◽  
Cultural Codes

Infancy and Early Childhood: Cross-Cultural Codes 2

Ethnology ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert Barry III ◽  
Leonora M. Paxson
Keyword(s):  
Early Childhood ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Cultural Codes ◽  
Infancy And Early Childhood

Adaptation of Personal Names: Transliteration, Transcription or Renomination?

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 177-186
Author(s):  
Elena A. Krasina ◽  
◽  
Oksana I. Aleksandrova
Keyword(s):  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Cultural Communication ◽  
Writing Systems ◽  
Semantic Class ◽  
Personal Names ◽  
Cross Cultural Communication ◽  
European Area ◽  
Cultural Codes ◽  
Letter Form ◽  
National Languages

Lexical-and-semantic class of personal names is characterized with a number of specific properties and functions. Synchronically, without appealing to etymology, those individual (individualized) names fulfil a secondary nomination function due to their semiotic function, which makes it possible interpret personal names as symbolic cultural codes belonging to national linguistic worldviews. Still, in course of cross-cultural communication, linguistic contacts demand personal names be translated from one language to another one. The aim of the article is to demonstrate the possibility of adaptation of personal names conserving their own semiotic and national identity while being globally transposed both into various languages and linguistic worldviews, including the general global linguistic worldview. As is generally acknowledged, due to the intranslatability of personal names, though languages of the European area reveal some correlations, the principle method to adapt them in literary and mass-media texts as well as in course of colloquial communication is the transformation of their exterior sound-and-letter form, so the foreground is made by the norms and rules of transliteration on the basis of the so-called “ideal” Latin alphabet and “practical” transcription which are closely interconnected and fixed as standard ones in the documents of international associations, e.g., ISO, MFO, etc. However, the alphabets and pronouncing norms of national languages are realized controversially which inevitably leads to developing variations and the necessity to revise the established standards. The implicitly positive result of personal names adaptation is the unification of transliteration, considering that even for languages using the hieroglyphic or letter-syllabic writing systems, special alphabets are developed, e.g., pingyin for Chinese or hangul for Korean, which have to provide the conventional communication in the intersection of languages and culture.

Cross-Cultural Codes On Seven Types of Rape

1987 ◽  
Vol 21 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 101-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia D. Rozée-Koker
Keyword(s):  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Cultural Codes

scholarly journals Ethnic Specificity of Cultural Codes

2020 ◽  
pp. 40-44
Author(s):  
Vladimir Mikhailovich Savitskij
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Analysis ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Natural Phenomena ◽  
Cultural Codes ◽  
Historic Development ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Cultural Code ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Communication Methods

The author compares and analyzes some definitions of the concept of cultural code offered by Russian and foreign linguists and semiologists. Aspects of this concept are singled out and described. Regulatory, semiotic and retransmitting functions of cultural codes are briefly characterized. The relationship between the concepts of cultural code and picture of the world is revealed. The author’s interpretation of the concept of cultural code is given, the ethnic specificity of cultural codes is revealed, its factors are described, participation of cultural codes in forming ethnic mentality is demonstrated. The author shows discrepancies in understanding reality due to the difference in the cultural codes used and points out that the role of cultural code can be performed by any perceptible area of reality: landscapes, natural phenomena, fauna, flora, artifacts (household utensils, tools, weapons, garments of clothes, dwelling places etc.) and actions with the listed items. All this is regarded in the article as semiotic means of thinking and communication. Methods. The analysis of cultural codes was carried out by using the methods of cross-cultural analysis and interlingual comparison on the material of English and Russian metaphoric set phrases. Conclusion. The conclusion is made concerning the influence of cultural codes on the choice of the path of historic development and, ultimately, on the fates of nations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document