Collaborating for Usable Knowledge: A Work in Progress by the Nonprofit Sector Research Fund

2000 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cinthia H. Schuman ◽  
Alan J. Abramson
1992 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-110
Author(s):  
Elizabeth T. Boris

1989 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Dennis R. Young ◽  
Paul J. DiMaggio ◽  
Walter W. Powell

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aya Okada ◽  
Yu Ishida ◽  
Takako Nakajima ◽  
Yasuhiko Kotagiri

2020 ◽  
pp. 089976402097765
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Jones ◽  
Robert Donmoyer

Historically, bias has been viewed as a problem with qualitative research, in large part because the researcher is often a qualitative study’s primary (or, in some cases, only) research “instrument.” Even most constructivists who reject traditional notions of scientific objectivity want to produce reasonably accurate reconstructions of their research participants’ interpretations of the social world. In fact, presenting accurate reconstructions is one thing constructivists mean when they talk about a study’s trustworthiness. Various procedures have been developed to minimize bias and ensure trustworthiness. The Formative Influences Timeline (FIT) is one such procedure. This article provides a brief history of bias in qualitative research, describes the FIT and how to use it, and reviews nonprofit research studies that either employed—or could have employed—the FIT to produce data relatively uncontaminated by researchers’ a priori assumptions. The article concludes by acknowledging limitations of the FIT.


2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 206-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Taylor ◽  
Nuttaneeya (Ann) Torugsa ◽  
Anthony Arundel

Positioned in the midst of the heated debate about the production of relevant and usable knowledge for practitioners in the nonprofit sector and a serious shortage of high-impact research that speaks to practice, the purpose of this Research Note is to direct nonprofit scholarship toward embracing “abduction,” which is the initial creative stage in scientific inquiry that facilitates the formulation of testable explanatory hypotheses and makes new discoveries in a sensory and logically structured way. We use an emerging interest in social innovation by the nonprofit sector as an illustrative example to show the advantages of using abductive reasoning as the primary method of reasoning for discovering new knowledge of a nascent but vital phenomenon. The novel contribution of this Research Note lies in encouraging scholarship on the nonprofit sector to an applied “practice-led” research process that is intellectually relevant and has the potential to bridge the scholar–practice divide.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aya Okada ◽  
Yu Ishida ◽  
Takako Nakajima ◽  
Yasuhiko Kotagiri

1976 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 109-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Vauclair

This paper gives the first results of a work in progress, in collaboration with G. Michaud and G. Vauclair. It is a first attempt to compute the effects of meridional circulation and turbulence on diffusion processes in stellar envelopes. Computations have been made for a 2 Mʘstar, which lies in the Am - δ Scuti region of the HR diagram.Let us recall that in Am stars diffusion cannot occur between the two outer convection zones, contrary to what was assumed by Watson (1970, 1971) and Smith (1971), since they are linked by overshooting (Latour, 1972; Toomre et al., 1975). But diffusion may occur at the bottom of the second convection zone. According to Vauclair et al. (1974), the second convection zone, due to He II ionization, disappears after a time equal to the helium diffusion time, and then diffusion may happen at the bottom of the first convection zone, so that the arguments by Watson and Smith are preserved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document