A Comparison of Self-Report and Caregiver Assessment of Depression, Apathy, and Irritability in Huntington’s Disease

2005 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 378-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjan Chatterjee ◽  
Karen E. Anderson ◽  
Carol B. Moskowitz ◽  
Willard A. Hauser ◽  
Karen S. Marder
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isobel McMillan ◽  
Duncan McLauchlan ◽  
Monica Busse ◽  
Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi ◽  
Ralf Reilmann ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Schindler ◽  
Nicole Pizzorni ◽  
Jenny Sassone ◽  
Lorenzo Nanetti ◽  
Anna Castaldo ◽  
...  

Abstract Huntington's disease (HD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor disturbances, cognitive decline, and behaviour changes. A well-recognized feature of advanced HD is dysphagia, which leads to malnutrition and aspiration pneumonia, the latter being the primary cause of death in HD. Previous studies have underscored the importance of dysphagia in HD patients with moderate-to-advanced stage disease, but it is unclear whether dysphagia affects patients already at an early stage of disease and whether genetic or clinical factors can predict its severity. We performed fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in 61 patients with various stages of HD. Dysphagia was found in 35% of early-stage, 94% of moderate-stage, and 100% of advanced-stage HD. Silent aspiration was found in 7.7% of early-stage, 11.8% of moderate-stage, and 27.8% of advanced-stage HD. A strong correlation was observed between disease progression and dysphagia severity: worse dysphagia was associated with worsening of motor symptoms. Dysphagia severity as assessed by FEES correlated with Huntington’s Disease Dysphagia Scale scores (a self-report questionnaire specific for evaluating swallowing in HD). The present findings add to our understanding of dysphagia onset and progression in HD. A better understanding of dysphagia onset and progression in HD may inform guidelines for standard clinical care in dysphagia, its recognition, and management.


CNS Spectrums ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (04) ◽  
pp. 413-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yael Manor ◽  
Yael Oestreicher-Kedem ◽  
Alona Gad ◽  
Jennifer Zitser ◽  
Achinoam Faust-Socher ◽  
...  

BackgroundHuntington’s disease (HD) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by increasing dysphagia as the disease progresses. Specific characteristics of the HD dysphagia are not well defined.ObjectiveTo characterize the swallowing disturbances of HD patients, to evaluate the feasibility of Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) in assessing dysphagia in HD patients, and to discern the relation between FEES findings and patients’ self-report on dysphagia symptoms and swallowing related quality of life (SWAL-QOL).MethodA retrospective case series in a tertiary referral center. All recruited HD patients underwent Bed Side Swallowing Evaluation (BSE), FEES, the Unified Huntington’s Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). All completed the Swallowing Disturbances Questionnaire (SDQ) and the SWAL-QOL questionnaire.ResultsFourteen HD patients were recruited. All were able to complete the FEES study. The FEES demonstrated delayed swallowing reflex, solid food residues, and pre/post swallowing spillage in most patients (50%, 53.5%, 83.3%, and 87.5%, respectively). The mean SDQ score was 13.2. Significant correlations were found between the SWAL-QOL fear of eating score; the SDQ oral, pharyngeal, and total scores; and the FEES parameters of pureed and solid food bolus flow time. Significant correlations were also found between the total UHDRS score, the volitional cough score, and the SWAL-QOL disease burden score.ConclusionHD patients exhibit prominent unique oropharyngeal dysphagia features that may serve as a marker of disease progression. The FEES and the SDQ are valuable tools for detecting these features in HD patients with swallowing disturbance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-369
Author(s):  
Katherine E. McDonell ◽  
Abagail E. Ciriegio ◽  
Anna C. Pfalzer ◽  
Lisa Hale ◽  
Shuhei Shiino ◽  
...  

Background: Risky behaviors are common in Huntington’s disease (HD) and can lead to significant adverse consequences. However, the prevalence and scope of these symptoms have not been studied systematically, and no empirically validated measures are available to screen for them. Objective: To test a novel screening tool designed to assess risk-taking behaviors in HD. Methods: We administered the Risk Behavior Questionnaire (RBQ-HD) to HD patients and caregivers at Vanderbilt University Medical Center between 2018-2019. Patients completed the questionnaire based on self-report; caregivers provided collateral reports. Clinical and demographic information were obtained from the electronic medical record. Results: 60 patients and 60 caregivers completed the RBQ-HD. 80% of patients (n = 48) and 91.7% of caregivers (n = 60) reported at least one risky behavior. Adverse social behaviors, impulsive/compulsive behaviors, and reckless driving were the most common behavioral domains reported. Male patients were more likely to report risky behaviors than females (92.3% vs. 70.6%, p = 0.04). The number of risky behaviors reported by patients and caregivers was negatively correlated with patient age (r = –0.32, p = 0.01; r = –0.47, p = 0.0001, respectively). Patient and caregiver reports were highly correlated in matched pairs (n = 30; r = 0.63, p = 0.0002). Conclusion: These findings emphasize that risky behaviors are highly prevalent in HD and can be effectively identified through the use of a novel screening measure. We hypothesize that early pathological involvement of frontostriatal and mesolimbic networks may be important factors in the development of these behaviors.


Author(s):  
Danielle C Hergert ◽  
Cynthia R Cimino

Abstract Objective Huntington’s disease (HD) is a genetic neurodegenerative condition that is characterized by cognitive, motor, and psychiatric dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to explore which disease characteristics influence caregiver burden in HD. Methods Fifty participants with HD and 50 of their caregivers participated in the study at the University of South Florida. Participants were administered a neuropsychological battery, the Unified Huntington’s Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) motor exam, and the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe) self-report. Caregivers completed the Caregiving Appraisal Scale and the FrSBe family-report. Results There were significant correlations between caregiver burden and caregiver age and sex, UHDRS motor scores, cognitive functioning, and self and caregiver-reported FrSBe scores. The significant variables were entered into a regression model and explained 63.1% of the variance in caregiver burden scores. Caregiver age, cognitive functioning, and caregiver-reported FrSBe scores continued to be significant predictors of caregiver burden, whereas the other variables were no longer significant. Conclusions There were significant relationships between caregiver burden, cognitive functioning, and frontally mediated behaviors, but not motor scores. The results suggest that possible interventions for caregivers may include education to caregivers on how to cope with apathy/executive dysfunction and cognitive decline. Caregiver age was associated with burden, with younger age being associated with increased burden when controlling for symptom severity. This has implications for this population in that HD typically has a younger age of onset than other neurodegenerative diseases and therefore, these caregivers may be particularly at risk for caregiver burden.


2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer De Souza ◽  
Lisa A. Jones ◽  
Hugh Rickards

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 543
Author(s):  
Kathleen E. Langbehn ◽  
Ashley M. Cochran ◽  
Ellen van der Plas ◽  
Amy L. Conrad ◽  
Eric Epping ◽  
...  

Reports of behavioral disturbance in Juvenile-Onset Huntington’s Disease (JOHD) have been based primarily on qualitative caregiver reports or retrospective medical record reviews. This study aims to quantify differences in behavior in patients with JOHD using informant- and self-report questionnaires. Informants of 21 children/young adults (12 female) with JOHD and 115 children/young adults (64 female) with a family history of Huntington’s Disease, but who did not inherit the disease themselves (Gene-Non-Expanded; GNE) completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) and the Pediatric Behavior Scale (PBS). Mixed linear regression models (age/sex adjusted) were conducted to assess group differences on these measures. The JOHD group had significantly higher scores, indicating more problems, than the GNE group on all BRIEF subscales, and measures of Aggression/Opposition and Hyperactivity/Inattention of the PBS (all p < 0.05). There were no group differences in Depression/Anxiety. Inhibit, Plan/Organize, Initiate, and Aggression/Opposition had significant negative correlations with Cytosine-Adenine-Guanine (CAG) repeat length (all p < 0.05) meaning that individuals with higher CAG repeats scored lower on these measures. There was greater discrepancy between higher informant-vs. lower self-reported scores in the JOHD group, supporting the notion of lack of insight for the JOHD-affected group. These results provide quantitative evidence of behavioral characteristics of JOHD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-302
Author(s):  
David Isaacs ◽  
Jessie S. Gibson ◽  
Jeffrey Stovall ◽  
Daniel O. Claassen

Background: Psychiatric symptoms are widely prevalent in Huntington’s disease (HD) and exert greater impact on quality of life than motor manifestations. Despite this, psychiatric symptoms are frequently underrecognized and undertreated. Lack of awareness, or anosognosia, has been observed at all stages of HD and may contribute to diminished patient self-reporting of psychiatric symptoms. Objective: We sought to evaluate the impact of anosognosia on performance of commonly used clinical rating scales for psychiatric manifestations of HD. Methods: We recruited 50 HD patients to undergo a formal psychiatrist evaluation, the Problem Behavior Assessment-Short Form (PBA-s), and validated self-report rating scales for depression, anxiety, and anger. Motor impairment, cognitive function, and total functional capacity were assessed as part of clinical exam. Patient awareness of motor, cognitive, emotional, and functional capacities was quantified using the Anosognosia Rating Scale. Convergent validity, discriminant validity, classification accuracy, and anosognosia effect was determined for each psychiatric symptom rating scale. Results: Anosognosia was identified in one-third of patients, and these patients underrated the severity of depression and anxiety when completing self-report instruments. Anosognosia did not clearly influence self-reported anger, but this result may have been confounded by the sub-optimal discriminant validity of anger rating scales. Conclusion: Anosognosia undermines reliability of self-reported depression and anxiety in HD. Self-report rating scales for depression and anxiety may have a role in screening, but results must be corroborated by provider and caregiver input when anosognosia is present. HD clinical trials utilizing patient-reported outcomes as study endpoints should routinely evaluate participants for anosognosia.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (7S_Part_9) ◽  
pp. P475-P475
Author(s):  
Ida Unmack Larsen ◽  
Tua Vinther-Jensen ◽  
Anders Gade ◽  
Joergen Erik Nielsen ◽  
Asmus Vogel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document