scholarly journals Neural correlates of illusory motion perception: The influence of apparent motion on plaid motion aftereffects

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 666-666
Author(s):  
L. R. Kozak ◽  
E. Formisano ◽  
W. Backes ◽  
J. Teixeira ◽  
J. Xavier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Apparent Motion ◽  
Neural Correlates ◽  
Illusory Motion ◽  
Plaid Motion ◽  
Motion Aftereffects

scholarly journals Neural correlates of illusory motion perception in Drosophila

2011 ◽  
Vol 108 (23) ◽  
pp. 9685-9690 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Tuthill ◽  
M. E. Chiappe ◽  
M. B. Reiser
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Neural Correlates ◽  
Illusory Motion

scholarly journals Neural correlates of apparent motion perception of impoverished facial stimuli: A comparison of ERP and ERSP activity

NeuroImage ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 442-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandra Rossi ◽  
Francisco J. Parada ◽  
Artemy Kolchinsky ◽  
Aina Puce
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Apparent Motion ◽  
Neural Correlates ◽  
Facial Stimuli

Apparent Motion Perception: The Contribution of the Binocular and Monocular Systems. An Improved Test Based on Motion Aftereffects

Perception ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 771-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noud A W H van Kruysbergen ◽  
Charles M M de Weert
Keyword(s):  
Test Stimulus ◽  
Motion Perception ◽  
Apparent Motion ◽  
Dynamic Test ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Static Test ◽  
Quantitative Results ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Motion Aftereffects

Research concerning the perception of apparent motion is not easy to conduct: it is hard to obtain quantitative results that can be easily interpreted. A solution to this problem is the use of motion aftereffects (MAEs). Adapting subjects to a specific type of motion leads to apparent motion in the opposite direction when the stimulus is removed. However, subjects are aware of the change in stimulus conditions. A new dynamic test stimulus is proposed in order to avoid artefacts introduced by the awareness of the conditions by the subject. A model, derived from earlier observations, is described which includes contributions from monocular and binocular systems. Results from an experiment in which the dynamic test stimulus was used show that they do not necessarily reproduce the results obtained with a static test stimulus. Central monocular systems are added to the model to account for this discrepancy. The ‘pooling hypothesis’, which states that the MAE is a weighted mean of the processes involved, permits the estimation of the weights of the individual subsystems. The results of the experiments are explained in terms of this hypothesis by the new model.

scholarly journals Neural correlates of illusory motion perception in the Pinna-figure

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 660-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Budnik ◽  
O. Speck ◽  
C. P. Kaller ◽  
K. Hamburger ◽  
B. Pinna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Neural Correlates ◽  
Illusory Motion

scholarly journals Neural Correlates of Induced Motion Perception in the Human Brain

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (41) ◽  
pp. 14344-14354 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Takemura ◽  
H. Ashida ◽  
K. Amano ◽  
A. Kitaoka ◽  
I. Murakami
Keyword(s):  
Human Brain ◽  
Motion Perception ◽  
Neural Correlates ◽  
Induced Motion

Neurobiological correlates of apparent motion perception in the human visual system using magnetoencephalography

NeuroImage ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 893
Author(s):  
C.I. Horenstein ◽  
R.R. Ramirez ◽  
E. Kronberg ◽  
U. Ribary ◽  
R.R. Llinas
Keyword(s):  
Visual System ◽  
Motion Perception ◽  
Apparent Motion ◽  
Human Visual System

4. Motion perception

2017 ◽  
pp. 50-58
Author(s):  
Brian Rogers
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Apparent Motion ◽  
Time To Contact ◽  
Motion System ◽  
Visual Systems ◽  
Temporal Process ◽  
The World ◽  
Induced Motion ◽  
After Effect ◽  
Spatio Temporal

The ability to detect motion is one of the most important properties of our visual system and the visual systems of nearly every other species. Motion perception is not just important for detecting the movement of objects—both for catching prey and for avoiding predators—but it is also important for providing information about the 3-D structure of the world, for maintaining balance, determining our direction of heading, segregating the scene and breaking camouflage, and judging time-to-contact with other objects in the world. ‘Motion perception’ describes the spatio-temporal process of motion perception and the perceptual effects that tell us something about the characteristics of the motion system: apparent motion, the motion after-effect, and induced motion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document