Collective Memory Distortion and the Quest for the Historical Jesus
2013 ◽
Vol 11
(1)
◽
pp. 53-76
◽
Keyword(s):
Memory theory is being used, if not explicitly to buttress the reliability of the Gospel portraits of Jesus, to do so implicitly by shifting the search away from the ipsissima verba Jesu towards the memory of Jesus. Rather than argue about what Jesus did or did not say—the reliability wars—some scholars now sidestep the issue by arguing that memory is inherently reliable in a broad or general way. Thus, the Gospels are reliable not at the level of detail, but at the level of broad memory, impact, or gist. In this article I argue that such optimism can only come by selectively quoting the troubling work of memory theorists, and by ignoring the full implications of memory theory.
Keyword(s):
2013 ◽
Vol 11
(1)
◽
pp. 77-97
2017 ◽
Vol 40
(1)
◽
pp. 51-61
Keyword(s):
2015 ◽
Vol 13
(1)
◽
pp. 66-89
Keyword(s):
2018 ◽
Vol 16
(2-3)
◽
pp. 173-182
Keyword(s):
2017 ◽
Vol 4
(4)
◽
pp. 105
◽
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):