The Implant Surface and Its Role in Affecting the Dynamic Processes of Bone Remodeling by Means of Distance Osteogenesis: A Comparative In Vivo Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Thiem ◽  
Martin Adam ◽  
Cornelia Ganz ◽  
Thomas Gerber ◽  
Peer Kämmerer
Keyword(s):  
Bone Remodeling ◽  
In Vivo Study ◽  
Dynamic Processes ◽  
Implant Surface

scholarly journals Comparison between Sandblasted Acid-Etched and Oxidized Titanium Dental Implants: In Vivo Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (13) ◽  
pp. 3267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugenio Velasco-Ortega ◽  
Ivan Ortiz-García ◽  
Alvaro Jiménez-Guerra ◽  
Loreto Monsalve-Guil ◽  
Fernando Muñoz-Guzón ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Rabbit Model ◽  
Chemical Properties ◽  
In Vivo Study ◽  
Implant Surface ◽  
Bone Response ◽  
Etched Surface ◽  
Titanium Dental Implants

The surface modifications of titanium dental implants play important roles in the enhancement of osseointegration. The objective of the present study was to test two different implant surface treatments on a rabbit model to investigate the osseointegration. The tested surfaces were: a) acid-etched surface with sandblasting treatment (SA) and b) an oxidized implant surface (OS). The roughness was measured by an interferometeric microscope with white light and the residual stress of the surfaces was measured with X-ray residual stress Bragg–Bentano diffraction. Six New Zealand white rabbits were used for the in vivo study. Implants with the two different surfaces (SA and OS) were inserted in the femoral bone. After 12 weeks of implantation, histological and histomorphometric analyses of the blocks containing the implants and the surrounding bone were performed. All the implants were correctly implanted and no signs of infection were observed. SA and OS surfaces were both surrounded by newly formed trabeculae. Histomorphometric analysis revealed that the bone–implant contact % (BIC) was higher around the SA implants (53.49 ± 8.46) than around the OS implants (50.94 ± 16.42), although there were no significant statistical differences among them. Both implant surfaces (SA and OS) demonstrated a good bone response with significant amounts of newly formed bone along the implant surface after 12 weeks of implantation. These results confirmed the importance of the topography and physico–chemical properties of dental implants in the osseointegration.

scholarly journals Local tissue effects and peri‐implant bone healing induced by implant surface treatment: an in vivo study in the sheep

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Rousseau ◽  
Inès Msolli ◽  
Patrick Chabrand ◽  
Arnaud Destainville ◽  
Olivier Richart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Bone Healing ◽  
In Vivo Study ◽  
Implant Surface ◽  
Local Tissue ◽  
Tissue Effects

In vitro and in vivo study of a sodium chloride impregnated microarc oxidation-treated titanium implant surface

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (22) ◽  
pp. 3549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaojing Wang ◽  
Guowei Wang ◽  
ShouQin Shan ◽  
Guangyan Hui ◽  
Tingkai Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sodium Chloride ◽  
Microarc Oxidation ◽  
Titanium Implant ◽  
In Vivo Study ◽  
Implant Surface ◽  
Titanium Implant Surface
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document