Comparison of Marginal Bone Level Changes of Immediately Loaded Implants, Delayed Loaded Nonsubmerged Implants, and Delayed Loaded Submerged Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 661-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Giacomel ◽  
Paulo Camati ◽  
Juliana Souza ◽  
Tatiana Deliberador
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Marginal Bone Level

scholarly journals Comparative Study between an Immediate Loading Protocol Using the Digital Workflow and a Conventional Protocol for Dental Implant Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piyanut Rattanapanich ◽  
Weerapan Aunmeungtong ◽  
Pisaisit Chaijareenont ◽  
Pathawee Khongkhunthian
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Immediate Loading ◽  
Digital Workflow ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Marginal Bone Level ◽  
Implant Treatment

Background: The purposes of this randomized clinical trial study was to compare the immediate loading of dental implants while employing digital workflow and conventional implants in terms of the success rate, marginal bone level, and patient satisfaction. Methods: Fifty patients who had edentulous area on the mandibular premolar or molar area were included in the study. Twenty-five patients were assigned to immediate loading implant treatment using the digital technique and 25 patients were assigned to conventional loading implant treatment. In the first group, the patients were received digital impression (Cerec Omnicam, Dentsply Sirona®, York, PA, USA), designed, producing zirconia crown, and inserted on the same surgery day. The second group, after a healing period of three months, was received analog impression following conventional impression for the zirconia crown. Clinical outcome and radiographic bone level were evaluated after three, six, and 12 months. Patient satisfaction was measured at 12 months after inserting the implant. Results: There was no implants and protheses failure in both groups. The mean resonance frequency analysis values at the day of surgery were 78.26 ± 4.09 in immediate loading using the digital group (ILD) and 73.74 ± 5.14 in the conventional loading group (CL), respectively. Insertion torque values at the day of surgery were 36.60 ± 12.64 in ILD and 38.8 ± 12.19 CL, respectively. The marginal bone level in CL at three, six, and 12 months were 0.14 ± 0.28 mm, 0.18 ± 0.30 mm, and 0.17 ± 0.29 mm, respectively, while in ILD at three, six, and 12 months were 0.18 ± 0.33 mm and 0.16 ± 0.27 mm and 0.15 ± 0.31, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Only one question in patient satisfaction’s questionnaire was “Now, can your dental implant and crown be used well?” had been significantly different in favor to the conventional group. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, it may be concluded that, after one-year follow up, there were no statistically significant differences between the immediate loading of dental implants employed from the digital workflow and conventional implant treatment technique in the success rate and marginal bone level. In patient satisfaction, there was only statistic significant difference in question related to implant prosthetic function in favor of the CL group, whereas the question concerning speaking, cleansing, price, and expectation displayed no difference.

A 7-year prospective radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around two different implant systems: a randomized clinical trial

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 1244-1249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doris Burtscher ◽  
Burkhard Norer ◽  
Daniel Dalla Torre ◽  
Ulrike Beier ◽  
Katharina Schubert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Marginal Bone Level

Effect of abutment height on interproximal implant bone level in the early healing: A randomized clinical trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Blanco ◽  
Alexandre Pico ◽  
Leticia Caneiro ◽  
Lourdes Nóvoa ◽  
Pilar Batalla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Early Healing

Five-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial comparing bone-level implants with either submerged or transmucosal healing

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Flores-Guillen ◽  
Carmen Álvarez-Novoa ◽  
Germán Barbieri ◽  
Conchita Martín ◽  
Mariano Sanz
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Bone Level
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document