Effect of Submerged vs Nonsubmerged Implant Placement Protocols on Implant Failure and Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramy Moustafa Ali ◽  
Ahmed Alqutaibi ◽  
Amr Gomaa ◽  
Mohamed Abdallah
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Implant Failure ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Implant Placement

scholarly journals Failure Rate, Marginal Bone Loss and Pink Esthetic of Socket-Shield Technique for Immediate Dental Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro Zubizarreta Macho ◽  
Roberta Rucco ◽  
Sergio Toledano Gil ◽  
Juan Carlos Bernabeu Mira ◽  
Jose María Montiel-Company ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Failure Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Implant Placement

scholarly journals Failure Rate, Marginal Bone Loss, and Pink Esthetic with Socket-Shield Technique for Immediate Dental Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 549
Author(s):  
Pilar Velasco Bohórquez ◽  
Roberta Rucco ◽  
Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho ◽  
José María Montiel-Company ◽  
Susana de la Vega Buró ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Failure Rate ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Conventional Technique ◽  
P Value ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Implant Placement

Aim: To compare the failure rate, marginal bone loss, and pink esthetic for the socket-shield technique and the conventional technique for immediate dental implant placement in the esthetic zone. Material and methods: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis, based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations, of clinical studies that evaluated the failure rate, marginal bone loss, and pink esthetic with the socket-shield technique for immediate dental implant placement in the esthetic zone was performed. A total of 4 databases were consulted in the literature search: PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. After eliminating duplicated articles and applying the inclusion criteria, 16 articles were selected for the qualitative and quantitative analysis. Results: Four randomized controlled trials, five prospective clinical studies, four retrospective studies, and three case series were included in the meta-analysis. The dental implant failure rate for the socket-shield technique for immediate dental implant placement was 1.37% (95% CI, 0.21–2.54%); however, no statistically significant differences between the conventional and socket-shield technique were found. The estimated mean difference in the marginal bone loss for the socket-shield technique was −0.5 mm (95% CI, −0.82 to −0.18) and statistically significant (p < 0.01), with a high heterogeneity (I2 = 99%). The mean pink esthetic score was 12.27 (Q test = 4.47; p-value = 0.61; I2 = 0%). The difference in pink esthetic between the conventional (n = 55) and socket-shield techniques (n = 55) for immediate dental implant placement was 1.15 (95% CI, 0.73–1.58; Q test = 8.88; p value = 0.11; I2 = 44%). The follow-up time was found to be significant (beta coefficient = 0.023; R2 = 85.6%; QM = 3.82; p = 0.049) for the PES for the socket-shield technique. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this systematic review with meta-analysis, the dental implant failure rate did not differ between the socket-shield technique and conventional technique for immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone. However, a lower marginal bone loss and higher pink esthetic scores were found for the socket-shield technique compared to the conventional technique.

Influence of abutment height on peri-implant marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-21.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaozhao Chen ◽  
Cho-Ying Lin ◽  
Junying Li ◽  
Hom-Lay Wang ◽  
Haiyang Yu
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document