Marginal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants Inserted with Static Computer Assistance in Healed Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 761-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeison Mejía ◽  
Kazumichi Wakabayashi ◽  
Tamaki Nakano ◽  
Hirofumi Yatani
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Computer Assistance

scholarly journals Evaluation of Implant Collar Surfaces for Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roodabeh Koodaryan ◽  
Ali Hafezeqoran
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Retrospective Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Present Systematic Review

Background. It is important to understand the influence of different collar designs on peri-implant marginal bone loss, especially in the critical area.Objectives. The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare dental implants with different collar surfaces, evaluating marginal bone loss and survival rates of implants.Methods. Eligibility criteria included clinical human studies, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective studies, which evaluated dental implants with different collar surface in the same study.Results. Twelve articles were included, with a total of 492 machined, 319 rough-surfaced, and 352 rough-surfaced microthreaded neck implants. There was less marginal bone loss at implants with rough-surfaced and rough-surfaced microthreaded neck than at machined-neck implants (difference in means: 0.321, 95% CI: 0.149 to 0.493;p<0.01).Conclusion. Rough and rough-surfaced microthreaded implants are considered a predictable treatment for preserving early marginal bone loss.

Influence of abutment height on peri-implant marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-21.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaozhao Chen ◽  
Cho-Ying Lin ◽  
Junying Li ◽  
Hom-Lay Wang ◽  
Haiyang Yu
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss

scholarly journals A systematic review on marginal bone loss around short dental implants (<10 mm) for implant-supported fixed prostheses

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1119-1124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Monje ◽  
Fernando Suarez ◽  
Pablo Galindo-Moreno ◽  
Agustín García-Nogales ◽  
Jia-Hui Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss

scholarly journals Long-Term Clinical Behavior and Complications of Intentionally Tilted Dental Implants Compared with Straight Implants Supporting Fixed Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 509
Author(s):  
Jorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann ◽  
Ignacio García-Gil ◽  
Patricia Pedregal ◽  
Jesús Peláez ◽  
Juan Carlos Prados-Frutos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Clinical Behavior ◽  
Manual Search

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term clinical behavior of straight implants in comparison with intentionally tilted dental implants (ITDI) supporting fixed restorations in partial or total edentulous arches, analyzing implant survival and success rates, complications, and marginal bone loss (MBL) after >5 years of function. An electronic search was conducted in five electronic databases (MEDLINE/Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) supplemented by a manual search. The electronic and manual search identified 1853 articles, of which 8 articles were selected for analysis. Out of a total of 3987 dental implants, 2036 were axial dental implants and 1951 tilted. Similar results were found in implant survival or overall implant success rates. Moreover, no statistically significant differences were found in MBL (p = 0.369; MD 0.116 mm (−0.137; 0.369) 95% CI) The prosthodontic/biological complications reported in the articles were very diverse and irregularly distributed. This systematic review suggests that there is no difference between tilted compared with straight dental implants in the medium-long term (>5 years). However, further research is needed to generate long-term data and confirm the present review’s findings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document