Two-Generation Transmission of Trisomy 18p: Prenatal Diagnosis in a Woman with Mild Intellectual Disability

2019 ◽  
Vol 157 (4) ◽  
pp. 220-226
Author(s):  
Yang Yu ◽  
Yuting Jiang ◽  
Xiaonan Hu ◽  
Hongguo Zhang ◽  
Ruizhi Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Unknown Origin ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis ◽  
Chromosome 15 ◽  
Derivative Chromosome ◽  
Mild Intellectual Disability ◽  
Trisomy 18P

Trisomy 18p is a rarely observed chromosomal aberration. Only 31 cases have previously been described in the literature. Trisomy 18p is associated with mild to moderate phenotypic anomalies and intellectual disability. Here, we report on a pregnant woman in whom noninvasive prenatal testing indicated a high risk of fetal trisomy 18. Prenatal diagnosis and karyotyping of the parents were performed and demonstrated that both the mother and the fetus had a derivative chromosome 15 with a segment of unknown origin. Chromosomal microarray analysis and FISH revealed a 14.9-Mb duplication of 18p and detected 3 centromeres of chromosome 18. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting trisomy 18p due to an unbalanced translocation of 18p onto chromosome 15q showing 2-generation transmission. The results suggest that trisomy 18p can be considered a euchromatic variant.

scholarly journals Outcomes of pregnancies with trisomy 16 mosaicism detected by NIPT: a series of case reports

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haishan Peng ◽  
Jiexia Yang ◽  
Dongmei Wang ◽  
Fangfang Guo ◽  
Yaping Hou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
High Risk ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis ◽  
True Positive ◽  
Trisomy 16

Abstract Background Trisomy 16 (T16) is thought to be the most frequent chromosome abnormality at conception, which is often associated with a high risk of abnormal outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis of 14 cases with high risk of T16 by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) was conducted. All cases in the analysis involved prenatal diagnosis, karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis. Case reports NIPT detected 12 cases of T16 and 2 cases of T16 mosaicism. Prenatal diagnosis confirmed 5 true positive cases and 9 false positive cases. Among the 5 true positive cases, 3 cases had ultrasound abnormalities. All of the 9 false positive cases continued their pregnancies. The newborns who were from these 9 false positive cases except 1 case (case 7) had low birth weights (< 2.5 kg) and there were also 2 premature deliveries. Conclusion NIPT serves as a fast and early prenatal screening method, giving clues to chromosome abnormalities and providing guidance for managing pregnancy. Confined placental mosaicism in 16 pregnancies may be at higher risk for preterm delivery.

scholarly journals Clinical management of pregnancies with positive screening results for rare autosomal aneuploidies at a single center

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 030006052096687
Author(s):  
Lingshan Gou ◽  
Yuan Fang ◽  
Na Wang ◽  
Man Zhang ◽  
Tianya Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Management ◽  
Uniparental Disomy ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Normal Pregnancy ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Trisomy 7

Objective To review our experiences on clinical management of pregnancies with positive noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results for rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs) at a single center. Methods We performed a retrospective study and reviewed data from 18,016 pregnancies undergoing NIPT at a single center in China from March 2017 to February 2020. Depending on the patient’s choice, women with positive screening results for RAAs underwent chromosomal microarray analysis for invasive prenatal diagnosis. Results Thirty-three positive cases for RAAs were identified, with a positive screening rate of 0.18%. The most common RAA was trisomy 7 (33.3%), while trisomies for other chromosomes were less frequent. Monosomies involving chromosomes 16, 14, and 22 were observed. Twenty-eight cases of RAAs underwent invasive diagnosis. Abnormal pregnancy outcomes were observed in four cases, including true fetal mosaicism (n=1), partial uniparental disomy (n=1), miscarriage (n=1), and structural anomalies on ultrasound (n=1). Conclusions RAAs at NIPT might be associated with fetal uniparental disomy, mosaic aneuploidy, and poor pregnancy outcomes, but most positive cases have normal pregnancy outcomes. For RAAs, genetic counseling on the potential risks of abnormal NIPT results, as well as on benefits and limitations of invasive prenatal diagnosis, might help guide clinical management.

scholarly journals Molecular characterization of a complex small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from chromosome 18p: an addition to the literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleonora Marchina ◽  
Michela Forti ◽  
Mariella Tonelli ◽  
Stefania Maccarini ◽  
Francesca Malvestiti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Molecular Characterization ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Marker Chromosome ◽  
Uniparental Disomy ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis ◽  
Specific Syndrome ◽  
Trisomy 18P

Abstract Background Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) are a heterogeneous group of structurally abnormal chromosomes, with an incidence of 0,044% in newborns that increases up to almost 7 times in developmentally retarded patients. sSMC from all 24 chromosome have been described, most of them originate from the group of the acrocentric, with around half deriving from the chromosome 15. Non-acrocentric sSMC are less common and, in the 30 percent of the cases, are associated with phenotypic effect. Complex sSMC consist of chromosomal material derived from more than one chromosome. Genotype–phenotype correlations in patients with sSMC are difficult to assess. Clinical features depend on factors such as its size, genetic content, the involvement of imprinted genes which may be influenced by uniparental disomy and the level of mosaicism. Trisomy of the short arm of chromosome 18 (18p) is an infrequent finding and does not appear to be associated with a specific syndrome. However, mild intellectual disability with or without other anomalies is reported in almost one-third of the patients. Case presentation Here we present clinical and molecular characterization of a new case of de novo complex sSMC consisting of the entire short arm of chromosome 18p associated with a centromere of either chromosome 13 or 21, evidenced in a 5-year-old boy during diagnostic workup for moderate intellectual disability and dysmorphisms. To date, only seven cases of isolated trisomy 18p due to a sSMC have been reported, three of which have been characterized by array CGH. In two of them the breakpoints and the size of the duplication have been described. In the manuscript we also reviewed cases reported in the DECIPHER database carrying similar duplication and also considered smaller duplications within the region of interest, in order to evaluate the presence of critical regions implicated in the pathological phenotype. Conclusions Our case provides additional information about phenotypic effects of pure trisomy 18p, confirms chromosomal microarray analysis as gold standard to characterize complex sSMC, and supplies additional elements for genetic counselling.

scholarly journals A retrospective study of noninvasive prenatal testing for chromosome aneuploidies and subchromosomal copy number variations in 24359 single pregnancies

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
yuefang Liu ◽  
Longfei Cheng ◽  
Yuan Peng ◽  
Zhe Liang ◽  
Xin Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Copy Number Variations ◽  
Trisomy 13 ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis

Abstract Background: With the development of whole-genome sequencing, small subchromosomal deletions and duplications could be found by non-invasive prenatal testing(NIPT). Our study is aimed to review the efficacy of NIPT as a screening test for aneuploidies and subchromosomal copy number variations (CNVs) in 24359 single pregnancies.Methods: A total of 24359 single pregnancies with different clinical features were retrospectively analyzed. Pathogenicity of abnormal NIPT results were assessed according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics(ACMG). Chromosome aneuploidies and subchromosomal CNVs were confirmed by karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis(CMA). Results: A total of 442 pregnancies (442/24359,1.9%) were with abnormal NIPT results. The positive predictive value (PPV) for trisomy 21(T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13), and sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) was 84.8%, 54.2%, 11.1% an 40.5% respectively. The PPV for subchromosomal CNVs was 59.0% (46/78). The clinical information, prenatal diagnosis results and follow-up results of 46 true positive cases, 6 cases with subchromosomal CNVs inconsistent with NIPT and 1 case of false negative were also demonstrated in detail.Conclusion: Our data have potential significance in demonstrating the significance of NIPT not only for common whole chromosome aneuploidies but also for subchromosomal CNV. Besides, the clinical information, prenatal diagnosis results and follow-up results of 52 cases with subchromosomal CNV and 1 case of false negative would provide important guidance for genetic counseling.

scholarly journals Prenatal Diagnosis of a 2.5 Mb De Novo 17q24.1q24.2 Deletion Encompassing KPNA2 and PSMD12 Genes in a Fetus with Craniofacial Dysmorphism, Equinovarus Feet, and Syndactyly

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Emmanuelle Naud ◽  
Lucie Tosca ◽  
Jelena Martinovic ◽  
Julien Saada ◽  
Corinne Métay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Facial Dysmorphism ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis ◽  
Conventional Cytogenetic Analysis ◽  
First Case ◽  
Craniofacial Dysmorphism ◽  
Talipes Equinovarus

Interstitial 17q24.1 or 17q24.2 deletions were reported after conventional cytogenetic analysis or chromosomal microarray analysis in patients presenting intellectual disability, facial dysmorphism, and/or malformations. We report on a fetus with craniofacial dysmorphism, talipes equinovarus, and syndactyly associated with a de novo 2.5 Mb 17q24.1q24.2 deletion. Among the deleted genes, KPNA2 and PSMD12 are discussed for the correlation with the fetal phenotype. This is the first case of prenatal diagnosis of 17q24.1q24.2 deletion.

scholarly journals Integrated CNV-seq, karyotyping and SNP-array analyses for effective prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Na Ma ◽  
Hui Xi ◽  
Jing Chen ◽  
Ying Peng ◽  
Zhengjun Jia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Snp Array ◽  
Genomic Rearrangements ◽  
Chromosomal Mosaicism ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Autosomal Aneuploidy ◽  
Number Variation

Abstract Background Emerging studies suggest that low‐coverage massively parallel copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) more sensitive than chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for detecting low-level mosaicism. However, a retrospective back-to-back comparison evaluating accuracy, efficacy, and incremental yield of CNV-seq compared with CMA is warranted. Methods A total of 72 mosaicism cases identified by karyotyping or CMA were recruited to the study. There were 67 mosaic samples co-analysed by CMA and CNV-seq, comprising 40 with sex chromosome aneuploidy, 22 with autosomal aneuploidy and 5 with large cryptic genomic rearrangements. Results Of the 67 positive mosaic cases, the levels of mosaicism defined by CNV-seq ranged from 6 to 92% compared to the ratio from 3 to 90% by karyotyping and 20% to 72% by CMA. CNV-seq not only identified all 43 chromosomal aneuploidies or large cryptic genomic rearrangements detected by CMA, but also provided a 34.88% (15/43) increased yield compared with CMA. The improved yield of mosaicism detection by CNV-seq was largely due to the ability to detect low level mosaicism below 20%. Conclusion In the context of prenatal diagnosis, CNV-seq identified additional and clinically significant mosaicism with enhanced resolution and increased sensitivity. This study provides strong evidence for applying CNV-seq as an alternative to CMA for detection of aneuploidy and mosaic variants.

scholarly journals A prenatal diagnosis case of partial duplication 21q21.1-q21.2 with normal phenotype maternally inherited

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunyan Jin ◽  
Zhiping Gu ◽  
Xiaohan Jiang ◽  
Pei Yu ◽  
Tianhui Xu
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Pregnant Woman ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Chromosome 21 ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis ◽  
Serological Screening ◽  
Partial Duplication ◽  
Her Family ◽  
Clinical Consequences

Abstract Background Down syndrome is characterized by trisomy 21 or partial duplication of chromosome 21. Extensive studies have focused on the identification of the Down Syndrome Critical Region (DSCR). We aim to provide evidence that duplication of 21q21.1-q21.2 should not be included in the DSCR and it has no clinical consequences on the phenotype. Case presentation Because serological screening was not performed at the appropriate gestational age, noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) analysis was performed for a pregnant woman with normal prenatal examinations at 22 weeks of gestation. The NIPT results revealed a 5.8 Mb maternally inherited duplication of 21q21.1-q21.2. To assess whether the fetus also carried this duplication, ultrasound-guided amniocentesis was conducted, and the result of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) with amniotic fluid showed a 6.7 Mb duplication of 21q21.1-q21.2 (ranging from position 18,981,715 to 25,707,009). This partial duplication of 21q21.1-q21.2 in the fetus was maternally inherited. After genetic counseling, the pregnant woman and her family decided to continue the pregnancy. Conclusion Our case clearly indicates that 21q21.1-q21.2 duplication is not included in the DSCR and most likely has no clinical consequences on phenotype.

scholarly journals Clinical characterization of chromosome 5q21.1–21.3 microduplication: A case report

Open Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1123-1127
Author(s):  
Shuang Chen ◽  
Yang Yu ◽  
Han Zhang ◽  
Leilei Li ◽  
Yuting Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Microarray Analysis ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis ◽  
Chromosome 5 ◽  
Left Lateral Ventricle ◽  
Pulsed Doppler Ultrasound

AbstractChromosomal microdeletions and microduplications likely represent the main genetic etiologies for children with developmental delay or intellectual disability. Through prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis, some microdeletions or microduplications can be detected before birth to avoid unnecessary abortions or birth defects. Although some microdeletions or microduplications of chromosome 5 have been reported, numerous microduplications remain undescribed. We describe herein a case of a 30-year-old woman carrying a fetus with a chromosome 5q21.1–q21.3 microduplication. Because noninvasive prenatal testing indicated a fetal chromosome 5 abnormality, the patient underwent amniocentesis at 22 weeks 4 days of gestation. Karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis were performed on amniotic fluid cells. Fetal behavioral and structural abnormalities were assessed by color and pulsed Doppler ultrasound. Clinical characteristics of the newborn were assessed during the follow-up. The left lateral ventricle appeared widened on ultrasound, but the infant appeared normal at birth. The 5q21.1–q21.3 microduplication in the fetus was inherited from his mother. There are seven genes in this duplication region, but their main functions are unclear. According to this case report, microduplication in this region could represent a benign mutation. Clinicians should pay attention to the breakpoints and the genes involved when counseling patients with microdeletions and microduplications.

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis and Prenatal Diagnosis

2014 ◽  
Vol 69 (10) ◽  
pp. 613-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie O. Lo ◽  
Brian L. Shaffer ◽  
Cori D. Feist ◽  
Aaron B. Caughey
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Microarray Analysis ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis

scholarly journals Follow-up in Patients With Non-invasive Prenatal Screening Failures: A Reflection on the Choice of Further Prenatal Diagnosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sha Liu ◽  
Hongqian Liu ◽  
Jianlong Liu ◽  
Ting Bai ◽  
Xiaosha Jing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis ◽  
Non Invasive

BackgroundOur aim was to provide a theoretical basis for clinicians to conduct genetic counseling and choose further prenatal diagnosis methods for pregnant women who failed non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS).MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on pregnant women who had failed NIPS tests.ResultsAmong the 123,291 samples, 394 pregnant women did not obtain valid results due to test failures. A total of 378 pregnant women were available for follow-up, while 16 patients were lost to follow-up. Of these 378, 135 pregnant women chose further prenatal diagnosis through amniocentesis, and one case of dysplasia was recalled for postpartum chromosome testing. The incidence rate of congenital chromosomal abnormalities in those who failed the NIPS was 3.97% (15/378), which was higher than that of the chromosomal abnormalities in the common population (1.8%). Among the pregnant women who received prenatal diagnosis, the positive rates of chromosomal abnormalities in the chromosomal microarray analysis/copy number variation sequencing (CMA/CNV-seq) group and in the karyotyping group were 15.28 and 4.76%, respectively.ConclusionPrenatal diagnosis should be strongly recommended in posttest genetic counseling for pregnant women with NIPS failures. Further, high-resolution detection methods should be recommended for additional prenatal diagnoses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document