Clinical Validity and Reliability of the Malay Language Translations of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia Questionnaire in a Primary Care Setting

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangeta Vadivelu ◽  
Zheng Feei Ma ◽  
Ean Wah Ong ◽  
Norhaliza Hassan ◽  
Nik Fariza Husna Nik Hassan ◽  
...  

Background: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERDQ) and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia Questionnaire (QOLRAD) are reliable tools for evaluation of GERD. Aim: We aimed to test validity and reliability of Malay language translations of GERDQ and QOLRAD in a primary care setting. Methods: The questionnaires were first translated into the Malay language (GERDQ-M and QOLRAD-M). Patients from primary care clinics with suspected GERD were recruited to complete GERDQ-M, QOLRAD-M, and Malay-translated 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36 or SF-36-M), and underwent endoscopy and 24-h pH-impedance test. Results: A total of 104 (mean age 47.1 years, women 51.9%) participants were enrolled. The sensitivity and specificity for GERDQ-M cut-off score ≥8 were 90.2 and 77.4%, respectively. Based on this cut-off score, 54.7% had a high probability of GERD diagnosis. GERD-M score ≥8 vs. < 8 was associated with erosive esophagitis (p < 0.001), hiatus hernia (p = 0.03), greater DeMeester score (p = 0.001), and Zerbib scores for acid refluxes (p < 0.001) but not non-acid refluxes (p = 0.1). Mean total scores of QOLRAD-M and SF-36-M were correlated (r = 0.74, p < 0.001). GERDQ-M ≥8, erosive esophagitis, and DeMeester ≥14.72 were associated with impaired QOLRAD-M in all domains (all p < 0.02) but this was not seen with SF-36. Conclusions: GERDQ-M and QOLRAD-M are valid and reliable tools applicable in a primary care setting.

2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 600-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy R. Smith ◽  
Robert A. Nicholson ◽  
James W. Banks

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 709-713
Author(s):  
Suravi Patra ◽  
Binod Kumar Patro ◽  
Manaswini Mangaraj ◽  
Soumya Swaroop Sahoo

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Supa Pengpid ◽  
Karl Peltzer

Abstract Background The study aimed to assess chronic diseases, multimorbidity, and QoL among patients attending two different treatment settings in Thailand. Methods In all, 1409 attendees of three monk healer or three health centres were assessed with self-reported measures on chronic conditions and Quality of Life (QoL). Results Results indicate that the most common chronic conditions were common mental disorder (25.2%), followed by hypertension (22.8%), high blood cholesterol (18.0%), fatigue disorder (14.4%), diabetes (14.0%), migraine headaches (13.7%), sleeping problem (12.2%), and ulcer (11.0%). In all, 40.6% had multimorbidity (two or more chronic conditions) (42.4% in the monk healer and 38.9% in the primary care setting). In ANCOVA analysis, adjusted for sex, age, employment status, marital status, education, economic status, comorbidity, and health care setting, the poorest overall QoL was found among clients with common mental disorders (58.5 mean score), followed by emphysema or asthma (60.2), sleeping problem (61.5), migraine headaches (62.7), fatigue disorder (63.3), substance use disorder (63.6) and ulcer (64.3). The overall QoL was poorer among monk healer clients (66.5) than primary care patients (68.8). In adjusted logistical regression analysis, being a monk healer attendee, older age (55–93 years), and high debt were positively, and being employed and better overall quality of life were negatively associated with multimorbidity, overall, for the monk healer and primary care setting. In adjusted linear regression analyses, primary health care attenders, older age, were employed and post-secondary education increased the odds of better overall QoL. Conclusion Multimorbidity was higher among clients attending monk healers than those attending primary care facilities and QoL was poorer among clients seeking care from monk healers than those attending primary care. High multimorbidity was found and major chronic conditions were found to have poor QoL. Determinants of multimorbidity and QoL in two different treatment settings provide information to improve the management of chronic conditions.


Acta Gymnica ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomas Vetrovsky ◽  
Jozef Cupka ◽  
Martin Dudek ◽  
Blanka Kuthanova ◽  
Klaudia Vetrovska ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-208
Author(s):  
Bruno A. da S. Dantas ◽  
Jessica M.A. de Miranda ◽  
Anna C.V. Cavalcante ◽  
Gislani A. da S. Toscano ◽  
Larissa S.S. Torres ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document