Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction during Cardiac Surgery: On-Pump versus Off-Pump Coronary Surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 354-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Brettner ◽  
Daniel Chappell ◽  
Lisa Schwartz ◽  
Alexander Lukasz ◽  
Philipp Kümpers ◽  
...  

Background: Cardiac surgery often causes ischemia and development of a systemic inflammatory response syndrome, which impairs vascular barrier function, normally maintained by the endothelial cell line and the endothelial glycocalyx (EG). The EG normally covers and protects healthy endothelial cells throughout the vasculature. The aim of the present study was to assess the disruption of the cellular part of the microvascular barrier by determining parameters of endothelial cell activation known to influence and reflect cell-cell junctional integrity. Particular attention was placed on angiopoietins and their important effects on endothelial gap junctions. Furthermore, comparative measurements were undertaken in patients undergoing on- and off-pump cardiac surgery, the latter group presumably experiencing less ischemic stress. Methods: 30 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery were assigned to the conventional coronary artery bypass (CCAB) group (n = 15) or the off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) group (n = 15). Blood samples were obtained for measuring angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1), angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin, and endocan at various time points. Results: There were significant increases in all measured parameters in both study groups versus the respective basal values. Maximal increases were as follows: Ang-1: CCAB +220%, OPCAB +166%, p < 0.05 each; Ang-2: CCAB +150%, OPCAB +20%, p < 0.05 each; VE-cadherin: CCAB +87%, OPCAB +66%, p < 0.05 each; endocan: CCAB +323%, OPCAB +72%, p < 0.05 each. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates the activation of endothelial cells, shedding of cell-cell contacts and a potential intrinsic counterregulation by Ang-1 and endocan in patients undergoing major cardiac surgery. Quantitatively greater deviations of parameters in the CCAB than in the OPCAB group suggest a relation between the occurrence of ischemia/reperfusion and the extent of endothelial activation.

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (7) ◽  
pp. 481-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Birla ◽  
P Patel ◽  
G Aresu ◽  
G Asimakopoulos

Introduction Although it is not a new technique, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) is employed only by a few surgeons in the UK. We compared our experience with MIDCAB with that of single vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) graft surgery through a standard median sternotomy. Methods Patients who underwent either MIDCAB or OPCAB between April 2008 and July 2011 were reviewed. Exclusion criteria included patients with an ejection fraction of <0.5 or previous cardiac surgery. Data were obtained retrospectively from our prospective database, medical records and through general practitioners. Results Overall, 74 patients were analysed in the MIDCAB group and 78 in the OPCAB group. Their demographics and EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) values were comparable (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the two groups in terms of mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, postoperative stroke, wound infection, atrial fibrillation or need for reintervention. The MIDCAB group had six conversions to a sternotomy. Eight patients in each group required blood transfusion, with the average transfusion being 1.8 units in the MIDCAB group and 3.2 units in the OPCAB group. The mean duration of ventilation and intensive care unit stay was 5.0 hours and 38.4 hours in the MIDCAB group and 5.4 and 47.8 hours in the OPCAB group. The mean hospital stay was significantly reduced in the MIDCAB population (6.1 vs 8.5 days, p<0.05). Conclusions MIDCAB can be performed safely in appropriately selected patients with outcomes comparable with OPCAB. The potential benefits include shorter hospital stay, reduced need for blood transfusion and faster recovery.


2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zrinka Požgain ◽  
Grgur Dulić ◽  
Goran Kondža ◽  
Siniša Bogović ◽  
Ivan Šerić ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Postoperative cognitive decline following cardiac surgery is one of the frequently reported complications affecting postoperative outcome, characterized by impairment of memory or concentration. The aetiology is considered multifactorial and the research conducted so far has presented contradictory results. The proposed mechanisms to explain the cognitive decline associated with cardiac surgery include the neurotoxic accumulation of β-amyloid (Aβ) proteins similar to Alzheimer's disease. The comparison of coronary artery bypass grafting procedures concerning postoperative cognitive decline and plasmatic Aβ1-42 concentrations has not yet been conducted. Methods The research was designed as a controlled clinical study of patients with coronary artery disease undergoing surgical myocardial revascularization with or without the use of a cardiopulmonary bypass machine. All patients completed a battery of neuropsychological tests and plasmatic Aβ1-42 concentrations were collected. Results The neuropsychological test results postoperatively were significantly worse in the cardiopulmonary bypass group and the patients had larger shifts in the Aβ1-42 preoperative and postoperative values than the group in which off-pump coronary artery bypass was performed. Conclusions The conducted research confirmed the earlier suspected association of plasmatic Aβ1-42 concentration to postoperative cognitive decline and the results further showed that there were less changes and lower concentrations in the off-pump coronary artery bypass group, which correlated to less neurocognitive decline. There is a lot of clinical contribution acquired by this research, not only in everyday decision making and using amyloid proteins as biomarkers, but also in the development and application of non-pharmacological and pharmacological neuroprotective strategies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Hatam ◽  
K Spetsostaki ◽  
G Musetti ◽  
H Steffen ◽  
R Autschbach ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) without the use of cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) was introduced to avoid the potential damaging effects of fpreign surfaces. Nevertheless, the value of off-pump CABG (OPCAB) remains controversial. Regional myocardial work has been shown to reflect regional metabolic demand and provide a more comprehensive assessment of myocardial function. Recently a novel non-invasive method for assessing regional MW by LV pressure–strain loop analysis has been described. Purpose To detect changes of MW after CABG comparing off- and on-pump techniques. Methods We prospectively evaluated 93 patients undergoing CABG (50 on- vs. 43 off-pump). Patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography exams prior to and one week after surgery as well as concurrently systolic arterial blood pressure measurements at rest. Besides conventional echocardiography parameters, wemeasured global longitudinal strain (GLS), global work index (GWI) and global work efficiency (GWE). Results All patients survived surgery. Patients in the OPCAB group had significantly higher EuroSCORE II (3.3% vs. 1.1%, p &lt; 0.001). Preoperatively, OPCABgroup had significantly lower EF (50.1 vs. 55.7%, p = 0.004), lower GWI (1411 vs. 1650mmHg%, p = 0.039) and lower GWE (86.7 vs. 91.6%, p = 0.017). GLS did not differ significantly between off- and on-pump groupspreoperatively. However, postoperatively GLS, MWI, MWE and EF decreased significantly within the on-pump group (p &lt; 0.001, p &lt; 0.001, p &lt; 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). In the OPCAB group only GWI and GLSdecreased significantly (p = 0.028 and p = 0.017, respectively). Due to the fact, that mean differences between all pre- and postoperative values were higher in the on-pump group, no significant differences in systolic LV-function (sLVF) could be detected between on- and off-pump patients postoperatively. During the early postoperative phase, no correlation between GWI and GWE and clinical outcomes could be detected, onlylower preoperative-GWI values showed a weak correlation with the incidence of postoperative cardiogenic shock (r= -0.27, p = 0.029). Conclusion Despite having worse preoperative sLVF in the off-pump group determined by EF, GLS, GWI and GWE, the decrease in sLVF parameters was significantly higher in the on-pump group, leading to an equal distribution of LV-function parameters between off- and on-pump patients postoperatively. Our results suggest that off-pump CABG provides a better preservation of LV-function.


2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Hedges ◽  
Nancy S. Redeker

Background Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgical procedures have been advocated to reduce the adverse effects of cardiopulmonary bypass on the brain. Objective To examine differences in objective and subjective characteristics of sleep and mood disturbance between patients after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Methods In a secondary analysis of pooled data from 2 previous studies, sleep characteristics and mood disturbance on postoperative night 2 after transfer to the cardiac surgery step-down unit were compared in patients who had on-pump and off-pump cardiac surgery. The sample included 129 coronary artery bypass patients: 48 on-pump patients from one hospital and 81 off-pump patients from another hospital. Data were obtained with wrist actigraphs. Subjective characteristics of sleep were determined by using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and a sleep diary; mood disturbance was evaluated by using the short form of the Profile of Mood States. Results Off-pump surgery was associated with better objective sleep continuity (decreased percentage of wake time after sleep onset and fewer awakenings) but not longer sleep duration after controlling for age and sex. The 2 groups of patients did not differ overall in subjective sleep characteristics, mood disturbance, or preoperative sleep quality. Conclusion Use of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery may improve sleep continuity during the early postoperative period. Prospective longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the potential long-term benefits of this procedure during the different phases of recovery.


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 334-340
Author(s):  
Alicja Michalak ◽  
Bożena Szyguła-Jurkiewicz ◽  
Mateusz Mościński ◽  
Piotr Muzyk ◽  
Konrad Samborski ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Tsuyoshi Yachi ◽  
Go Watanabe ◽  
Shigeyuki Tomita

Objective In this study, we measured the activity of coagulation and fibrinolysis and clarified the presence of certain differences between off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) cases and awake off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (AOCAB) cases to evaluate whether AOCAB is actually safe from the viewpoint of coagulability. Methods 8 underwent OPCAB and 6 underwent AOCAB. The following factors inducing coagulation and fibrinolysis were measured for upto 5 days after the operation: platelet counts, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, fibrin degeneration products, D-dimer, thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT), α2-plasmin inhibitor-plasmin complex, prothrombin fragment 1, 2 (F1+2), thrombomodulin, β-thromboglobulin (β-TG), and platelet factor-4. Results At 5 days after the operation, fibrin degeneration products, D-dimer, α2–plasmin inhibitor-plasmin complex, and F1 + 2 levels of the OPCAB group were significantly higher compared with their baseline values and those of the AOCAB group. At 5 days after the operation, thrombin-antithrombin III complex levels of the OPCAB group were significantly higher than those of the AOCAB group. Fibrinogen levels of the OPCAB group were significantly higher than their baseline values at 3 days after the operation (POD3) and 5 days after the operation (POD5). Conclusions In this study, the hypercoagulable state at POD5 was suggested in the patients in the OPCAB group, but not in those in the AOCAB group. Further study is necessary to confirm these results, and future studies would evaluate the potential benefit of AOCAB procedure from the viewpoint of perioperative coagulability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document