Estimating the Endotracheal Tube Insertion Depth in Newborns Using Weight or Gestation: A Randomised Trial

Neonatology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aisling M. Flinn ◽  
Colm P. Travers ◽  
Eoghan E. Laffan ◽  
Colm P.F. O''Donnell
BMJ ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 341 (nov09 1) ◽  
pp. c5943-c5943 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Sitzwohl ◽  
A. Langheinrich ◽  
A. Schober ◽  
P. Krafft ◽  
D. I. Sessler ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Madeleine C Murphy ◽  
Veronica B Donoghue ◽  
Colm Patrick Finbarr O’Donnell

BackgroundEndotracheal tube (ETT) tip position is determined on chest X-ray (CXR) and should lie between the upper border of the first thoracic vertebra (T1) and the lower border of second thoracic vertebra (T2). Infant weight is commonly used to estimate how far the ETT should be inserted but frequently results in malpositioned ETT tips. Palpation of the ETT tip at the suprasternal notch has been recommended as an alternative.ObjectiveTo determine whether estimating ETT insertion depth using suprasternal palpation of the ETT tip rather than weight results in more correctly positioned ETT tips.DesignSingle-centre randomised controlled trial.SettingLevel III neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at a university maternity hospital.PatientsNewborn infants without congenital anomalies intubated in the NICU.InterventionsParticipants were randomised to have ETT insertion depth estimated using palpation of the ETT tip at the suprasternal notch or weight [insertion depth (cm)=6 + wt (kg)].Main outcome measureCorrect ETT position, that is, between the upper border of T1 and lower border of T2 on CXR, determined by one consultant paediatric radiologist masked to group assignment.ResultsThere was no difference in the proportion of correctly placed ETT tips between the groups (suprasternal palpation 27/58 (47%) vs weight 23/60 (38%), p=0.456). Most incorrectly positioned ETTs were too low (56/68 (82%)).ConclusionEstimating ETT insertion depth using suprasternal palpation did not result in more correctly positioned ETTs.Trial registration numberISRCTN13570106.


2018 ◽  
Vol 200 ◽  
pp. 265-269.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dianne Lee ◽  
Patricia C. Mele ◽  
Wei Hou ◽  
Joseph D. Decristofaro ◽  
Echezona T. Maduekwe

2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. F312-F316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irwin Gill ◽  
Aisling Stafford ◽  
Madeleine C Murphy ◽  
Aisling R Geoghegan ◽  
Miranda Crealey ◽  
...  

BackgroundWhen intubating newborns, clinicians aim to position the endotracheal tube (ETT) tip in the midtrachea. The depth to which ETTs should be inserted is often estimated using the infant’s weight. ETTs are frequently incorrectly positioned in newborns, most often inserted too far. Using the vocal cord guide (a mark at the distal end of the ETT) to guide insertion depth has been recommended.ObjectiveTo determine whether estimating ETT insertion depth using the vocal cord guide rather than weight results in more correctly positioned ETT tips.DesignSingle-centre randomised controlled trial.SettingLevel III neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at a university maternity hospital (National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland).PatientsNewborn infants without congenital anomalies intubated in the NICU.InterventionsParticipants were randomised to have ETT insertion depth estimated using weight [insertion depth (cm) = weight (kg) +6] or vocal cord guide.Main outcome measureCorrect ETT position, that is, tip between the upper border of the first thoracic vertebra (T1) and the lower border of the second thoracic vertebra (T2) on a chest X-ray as determined by one paediatric radiologist masked to group assignment.Results136 participants were randomised. The proportion of correctly positioned ETTs was similar in both groups (weight 30/69 (44%) vs vocal cord guide 27/67 (40%), p=0.731). Most incorrectly positioned ETT (69/79, 87%) were too low.ConclusionEstimating ETT insertion depth using the vocal cord guide did not result in more correctly positioned ETT tips.Trial registration numberISRCTN39654846.


2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 932-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syusuke Takeuchi ◽  
Junichi Arai ◽  
Motomichi Nagafuji ◽  
Ayako Hinata ◽  
Tae Kamakura ◽  
...  

CJEM ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark O. Tessaro ◽  
Alexander C. Arroyo ◽  
Lawrence E. Haines ◽  
Eitan Dickman

AbstractAlthough bedside ultrasonography can accurately distinguish esophageal from tracheal intubation, it is not used to establish the correct depth of endotracheal tube insertion. As indirect sonographic markers of endotracheal tube insertion depth have proven unreliable, a method for visual verification of correct tube depth would be ideal. We describe the use of saline to inflate the endotracheal cuff to confirm correct endotracheal tube depth (at the level of the suprasternal notch) by bedside ultrasonography during resuscitation. This rapid technique holds promise during emergency intubation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document