scholarly journals Pathogenesis of Cardiorenal Syndrome Type 1 in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Workgroup Statements from the Eleventh Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI)

2013 ◽  
pp. 99-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Haase ◽  
Christian Müller ◽  
Kevin Damman ◽  
Patrick T. Murray ◽  
John A. Kellum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiorenal Syndrome ◽  
Consensus Conference ◽  
Syndrome Type ◽  
Acute Dialysis

Tidal peritoneal dialysis versus ultrafiltration in type 1 cardiorenal syndrome: A prospective randomized study

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 684-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah K Al-Hwiesh ◽  
Ibrahiem Saeed Abdul-Rahman ◽  
Nadia Al-Audah ◽  
Amani Al-Hwiesh ◽  
Mousa Al-Harbi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Creatinine Level ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiorenal Syndrome ◽  
Fluid Loss ◽  
Tidal Peritoneal Dialysis

Background: Ultrafiltration is an alternative strategy to diuretic therapy for the treatment of patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Little is known about the efficacy and safety of peritoneal dialysis in patients with acute decompensated heart failure complicated by acute cardiorenal syndrome. Methods: We randomly assigned a total of 88 patients with type 1 acute cardiorenal syndrome to a strategy of ultrafiltration therapy (44 patients) or tidal peritoneal dialysis (44 patients). The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the serum creatinine level and left ventricular function represented as ejection fraction, as assessed 72 and 120 h after random assignment. Patients were followed for 90 days after discharge from the hospital. Results: Ultrafiltration therapy was inferior to tidal peritoneal dialysis therapy with respect to the primary endpoint of the change in the serum creatinine levels at 72 and 120 h ( p = 0.041) and ejection fraction at 72 and 120 h after enrollment ( p = 0.044 and p = 0.032), owing to both an increase in the creatinine level in the ultrafiltration therapy group and a decrease in its level in the tidal peritoneal dialysis group. At 120 h, the mean change in the creatinine level was 1.4 ± 0.5 mg/dL in the ultrafiltration therapy group, as compared with 2.4 ± 1.3 mg/dL in the tidal peritoneal dialysis group ( p = 0.023). At 72 and 120 h, there was a significant difference in weight loss between patients in the ultrafiltration therapy group and those in the tidal peritoneal dialysis group ( p = 0.025). Net fluid loss was also greater in tidal peritoneal dialysis patients ( p = 0.018). Adverse events were more observed in the ultrafiltration therapy group ( p = 0.007). At 90 days post-discharge, tidal peritoneal dialysis patients had fewer rehospitalization for heart failure (14.3% vs 32.5%, p = 0.022). Conclusion: Tidal peritoneal dialysis is a safe and effective means for removing toxins and large quantities of excess fluid from patients with intractable heart failure. In patients with cardiorenal syndrome type 1, the use of tidal peritoneal dialysis was superior to ultrafiltration therapy for the preservation of renal function, improvement of cardiac function, and net fluid loss. Ultrafiltration therapy was associated with a higher rate of adverse events.

scholarly journals CARDIORENAL SYNDROME IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEART FAILURE AS A STAGE OF THE CARDIORENAL CONTINUUM (PART I): DEFINITION, CLASSIFICATION, PATHOGENESIS, DIAGNOSIS, EPIDEMIOLOGY

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. V. Reznik ◽  
I. G. Nikitin
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Impaired Renal Function ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Cardiorenal Syndrome ◽  
Syndrome Type ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

The combination of heart failure and renal failure is called cardiorenal syndrome. It is a stage of the cardiorenal continuum and, possibly, a small link of the cardiorenal-cerebral-metabolic axis. Despite the fact that the phrase “cardiorenal syndrome” and its five types have become a part of the medical lexicon, many aspects of this problem are still not clear. Cardiorenal syndrome can be diagnosed in 32-90.3% of patients with heart failure. Cardiorenal syndrome type 1 or 2 develops in most cases of heart failure: cardiorenal syndrome presents with the development ofchronic kidney disease in patients with chronic heart failure and acute kidney injury in patients with acute heart failure. Impaired renal function has an unfavorable prognostic value. It leads to an increase in the mortality of patients with heart failure. It is necessary to timely diagnose the presence of cardiorenal syndrome and take into account its presence when managing patients with heart failure. Further researches are needed on ways toprevent the development and prevent the progression of kidney damage in patients with heart failure, to which the efforts of the multidisciplinary team should be directed. The first part of this review examines the currently definition, classification, pathogenesis, epidemiology and prognosis of cardiorenal syndrome in patients with heart failure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document