Indirubin-3‘-Monoxime, an Inhibitor of Cyclin Dependent Kinases, Induces Growth Inhibition and Apoptosis in Renal Cell Cancer in vitro

2007 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-23
Author(s):  
F.G.E. Perabo ◽  
G. Landwehrs ◽  
C. Frössler ◽  
D.H. Schmidt ◽  
A. Wirger ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 650-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivraj Singh Sandhu ◽  
Nicholas James Maksim ◽  
Eva Alice Amouzougan ◽  
Bryce Wilson Gallion ◽  
Anthony L.J. Raviele ◽  
...  

The nuclear erythroid 2-like 2 transcription factor (NRF2), is a major regulator of cellular redox balance. Although NRF2 activation is generally regarded as beneficial to human health, recent studies have identified that sustained NRF2 activation is over-represented in many cancers. This raises the question regarding the role of NRF2 activation in the development and progression of those cancers. This review focuses on the mechanisms and the effects of NRF2 activation in two hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes: hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC) and hereditary tyrosinemia type 1 (HT1). Because the cancer initiating mutations in these hereditary syndromes are well defined, they offer a unique opportunity to explore the roles of NRF2 activation in the early stages of carcinogenesis. Over the years, a variety of approaches have been utilized to study the biology of HLRCC and HT1. In HLRCC, in vitro studies have demonstrated the importance of NRF2 activation in sustaining cancer cell proliferation. In the mouse model of HT1 however, NRF2 activation seems to protect cells from malignant transformation. In both HT1 and HLRCC, NRF2 activation promotes the clearance of electrophilic metabolites, enabling cells to survive cancer-initiating mutations. Biological insights gained from the hereditary syndromes’ studies may shed light on to the roles of NRF2 activation in sporadic tumours.


In Vitro ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 623-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Williams ◽  
A. Y. Elliott ◽  
N. Stein ◽  
E. E. Fraley

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 495-495
Author(s):  
Richard C. Lauer ◽  
Ian Rabinowitz ◽  
Terry Novak ◽  
Martin J. Edelman

495 Background: B is a small molecule proteasome inhibitor that affects multiple signaling pathways. S is an orally active multikinase inhibitor with known activity in renal cell cancer. In vitro data has shown that S and B interact synergistically in a number of neoplastic cell lines to cause apoptosis. A phase 1 trial of S and B demonstrated no unexpected toxicities. We now report the results of this phase 2 efficacy trial. Methods: Eligibility included cytologically confirmed clear cell cancer with no prior chemotherapy, PS 0-1, Cr < 1.5 mg/dl, normal LFTs. Regimen: S 200 mg PO BID and B 1mg/m2 IV days 1,4,8, & 11 every 21 days. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective of the study was to achieve a PFS of 70 weeks. Results: Seventeen patients were enrolled between April of 2011 and January of 2013. Median age was 62y (range 44-75). Four of 17 patients had known brain metastasis on entry to the trial. Median number of cycles = 4 (range 1-45+). Response: CR/PR/SD/PD =0/1/12/4 (RR: 6%, 95% CI = 0%, 29%) Median progression free survival was 13.7 weeks; median overall survival was 110 weeks Toxicity: See table. Only 1 pts. treatment was stopped due to an AE of pancreatitis. There were no toxic deaths. The study was halted for futility. Conclusions: 1.The combination of S and B was well tolerated. 2. The RR of 6% and PFS of 13.7 weeks is not superior to S as a single agent. 3. The combination of SB is not recommended for further development. Clinical trial information: NCT 01100242.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 1017-1027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoaki Takai ◽  
Takuya Tsujino ◽  
Yuki Yoshikawa ◽  
Teruo Inamoto ◽  
Nobuhiko Sugito ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Bazeed ◽  
T. Scharfe ◽  
E. Becht ◽  
J. Schmidt ◽  
G.H. Jacobi ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 488-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mostafa M. Elhilali ◽  
Shankar K. Nayak

In Vitro ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 779-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Williams ◽  
A. Y. Elliott ◽  
N. Stein ◽  
E. E. Fraley

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 175-175
Author(s):  
Axel S. Merseburger ◽  
Joerg Hennenlotter ◽  
Perikles Simon ◽  
Marcus Horstmann ◽  
Arnulf Stenzl ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document