scholarly journals Evaluation of Guided Bone Regeneration in Critical Defects Using Bovine and Porcine Collagen Membranes: Histomorphometric and Immunohistochemical Analyses

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Guilherme A. D. Ramires ◽  
Julia Taino Helena ◽  
Júlio C. S. De Oliveira ◽  
Leonardo Perez Faverani ◽  
Ana Paula F. Bassi
Keyword(s):  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Bovine Collagen ◽  
Collagen Group ◽  
Collagen Membranes ◽  
Critical Bone Defects ◽  
Histological Results ◽  
Porcine Collagen ◽  
Immunohistochemical Analyses

Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a technique used to facilitate bone regeneration, which uses a biocompatible membrane acting as a physical barrier to prevent the adjacent connective tissue from invading the bone defect. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of bovine and porcine collagenous membranes as barriers to connective tissue invasion during the repair of critical bone defects in rat calvaria, using histological, histometric, and immunohistochemical analyses. For this study, 72 rats were divided into three groups: clot group (CG), bovine collagen group (BCG), and porcine collagen group (PCG). Analyses were performed on days 7, 15, 30, and 60. The histological results showed that the PCG exhibited bone neoformation starting from day 7, and after 30 days of repair, the surgical defect was completely filled in some animals. For the BCG, there was little bone neoformation activity in the initial periods, and from day 30 onwards, there was an increase in bone neoformation, with a greater increase on day 60. The data obtained in the histometric analysis reveal that, on day 30, the neoformed bone area did not vary greatly between the PCG and the BCG, though both varied from the CG. By day 60, the PCG presented a greater area of neoformation than the BCG. These results were corroborated by the immunohistochemistry results. In view of the results obtained, it can be concluded that all membranes studied in this research promoted GBR.

scholarly journals Selection of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration: A Literature Review

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Sbricoli ◽  
Riccardo Guazzo ◽  
Marco Annunziata ◽  
Luca Gobbato ◽  
Eriberto Bressan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Barrier Membranes ◽  
Collagen Membranes ◽  
Collagen Versus ◽  
The Right ◽  
Grafting Materials ◽  
Selection Of

Several treatment modalities have been proposed to regenerate bone, including guided bone regeneration (GBR) where barrier membranes play an important role by isolating soft tissue and allowing bone to grow. Not all membranes biologically behave the same way, as they differ from their origin and structure, with reflections on their mechanical properties and on their clinical performance. Collagen membranes have been widely used in medicine and dentistry, because of their high biocompatibility and capability of promoting wound healing. Recently, collagen membranes have been applied in guided bone regeneration with comparable outcomes to non-resorbable membranes. Aim of this work is to provide a review on the main features, application, outcomes, and clinical employment of the different types of collagen membranes. Comparisons with non-resorbable membranes are clarified, characteristics of cross-linked collagen versus native collagen, use of different grafting materials and need for membrane fixation are explored in order to gain awareness of the indications and limits and to be able to choose the right membrane required by the clinical condition.

scholarly journals Bioresorbable Collagen Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration

10.5772/34667 ◽  
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haim Tal ◽  
Ofer Moses ◽  
Avital Kozlovsky ◽  
Carlos Nemcovsky
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Collagen Membranes

scholarly journals Evaluation of Bone Gain and Complication Rates after Guided Bone Regeneration with Titanium Foils: A Systematic Review

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 5346
Author(s):  
Elisabet Roca-Millan ◽  
Enric Jané-Salas ◽  
Albert Estrugo-Devesa ◽  
José López-López
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Native Bone ◽  
Collagen Membranes ◽  
Bone Gain

Guided bone regeneration techniques are increasingly used to enable the subsequent placement of dental implants. This systematic review aims to analyze the success rate of these techniques in terms of bone gain and complications rate using titanium membranes as a barrier element. Electronic and hand searches were conducted in PubMed/Medline, Scielo, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases for case reports, case series, cohort studies and clinical trials in humans published up to and including 19 September 2020. Thirteen articles were included in the qualitative analysis. Bone gain both horizontally and vertically was comparable to that obtained with other types of membranes more commonly used. The postoperative complication rate was higher that of native collagen membranes and non-resorbable titanium-reinforced membranes, and similar that of crosslinked collagen membranes and titanium meshes. The survival rate of the implants was similar to that of implants placed in native bone. Due to the limited scientific literature published on this issue, more randomized clinical trials comparing occlusive titanium barriers and other types of membranes are necessary to reach more valid conclusions.

scholarly journals In Vitro and In Vivo Study of a Novel Porcine Collagen Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration

Materials ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eisner Salamanca ◽  
Chi-Yang Tsai ◽  
Yu-Hwa Pan ◽  
Yu-Te Lin ◽  
Haw-Ming Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
In Vivo Study ◽  
Collagen Membrane ◽  
Porcine Collagen

scholarly journals Evaluation of 1-Ethyl-3-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl) Carbodiimide Cross-Linked Collagen Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration in Beagle Dogs

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 4599
Author(s):  
Jong-Ju Ahn ◽  
Hyung-Joon Kim ◽  
Eun-Bin Bae ◽  
Won-Tak Cho ◽  
YunJeong Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Strength ◽  
Physical Properties ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Enzymatic Degradation ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Collagen Membrane ◽  
Micro Computed Tomography ◽  
Collagen Membranes

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bone regeneration efficacy of an 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC)-cross-linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration (GBR). A non-cross-linked collagen membrane (Control group), and an EDC-cross-linked collagen membrane (Test group) were used in this study. In vitro, mechanical, and degradation testing and cell studies were performed. In the animal study, 36 artificial bone defects were formed in the mandibles of six beagles. Implants were inserted at the time of bone grafting, and membranes were assigned randomly. Eight weeks later, animals were sacrificed, micro-computed tomography was performed, and hematoxylin-eosin stained specimens were prepared. Physical properties (tensile strength and enzymatic degradation rate) were better in the Test group than in the Control group. No inflammation or membrane collapse was observed in either group, and bone volumes (%) in defects around implants were similar in the two groups (p > 0.05). The results of new bone areas (%) analysis also showed similar values in the two groups (p > 0.05). Therefore, it can be concluded that cross-linking the collagen membranes with EDC is the method of enhancing the physical properties (tensile strength and enzymatic degradation) of the collagen membranes without risk of toxicity.

scholarly journals In Vivo Comparative Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Biodegradation of Bovine and Porcine Collagen Membranes

Membranes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 423
Author(s):  
Abdu Mansur Dacache Neto ◽  
Suelen Cristina Sartoretto ◽  
Isabelle Martins Duarte ◽  
Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito Resende ◽  
Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino Alves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Subcutaneous Tissue ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Tissue Reaction ◽  
Clinical Indication ◽  
Collagen Membrane ◽  
Tissue Reactions ◽  
Porcine Collagen

Mechanical barriers prevent the invasion of the surrounding soft tissues within the bone defects. This concept is known as Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR). The knowledge about the local tissue reaction and the time of degradation of absorbable membranes favors the correct clinical indication. This study aimed to evaluate the biocompatibility and biodegradation of a bovine collagen membrane (Lyostypt®, São Gonçalo, Brazil) and compare it to a porcine collagen membrane (Bio-Gide®) implanted in the subcutaneous tissue of mice, following ISO 10993-6:2016. Thirty Balb-C mice were randomly divided into three experimental groups, LT (Lyostypt®), BG (Bio-Gide®), and Sham (without implantation), and subdivided according to the experimental periods (7, 21, and 63 days). The BG was considered non-irritant at seven days and slight and moderate irritant at 21 and 63 days, respectively. The LT presented a small irritant reaction at seven days, a mild reaction after 21, and a reduction in the inflammatory response at 63 days. The biodegradation of the LT occurred more rapidly compared to the BG after 63 days. This study concluded that both membranes were considered biocompatible since their tissue reactions were compatible with the physiological inflammatory process; however, the Bio-Gide® was less degraded during the experimental periods, favoring the guided bone regeneration process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document