scholarly journals Bioresorbable Collagen Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration

10.5772/34667 ◽  
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haim Tal ◽  
Ofer Moses ◽  
Avital Kozlovsky ◽  
Carlos Nemcovsky
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Collagen Membranes

scholarly journals Selection of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration: A Literature Review

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Sbricoli ◽  
Riccardo Guazzo ◽  
Marco Annunziata ◽  
Luca Gobbato ◽  
Eriberto Bressan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Barrier Membranes ◽  
Collagen Membranes ◽  
Collagen Versus ◽  
The Right ◽  
Grafting Materials ◽  
Selection Of

Several treatment modalities have been proposed to regenerate bone, including guided bone regeneration (GBR) where barrier membranes play an important role by isolating soft tissue and allowing bone to grow. Not all membranes biologically behave the same way, as they differ from their origin and structure, with reflections on their mechanical properties and on their clinical performance. Collagen membranes have been widely used in medicine and dentistry, because of their high biocompatibility and capability of promoting wound healing. Recently, collagen membranes have been applied in guided bone regeneration with comparable outcomes to non-resorbable membranes. Aim of this work is to provide a review on the main features, application, outcomes, and clinical employment of the different types of collagen membranes. Comparisons with non-resorbable membranes are clarified, characteristics of cross-linked collagen versus native collagen, use of different grafting materials and need for membrane fixation are explored in order to gain awareness of the indications and limits and to be able to choose the right membrane required by the clinical condition.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Bone Gain and Complication Rates after Guided Bone Regeneration with Titanium Foils: A Systematic Review

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 5346
Author(s):  
Elisabet Roca-Millan ◽  
Enric Jané-Salas ◽  
Albert Estrugo-Devesa ◽  
José López-López
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Native Bone ◽  
Collagen Membranes ◽  
Bone Gain

Guided bone regeneration techniques are increasingly used to enable the subsequent placement of dental implants. This systematic review aims to analyze the success rate of these techniques in terms of bone gain and complications rate using titanium membranes as a barrier element. Electronic and hand searches were conducted in PubMed/Medline, Scielo, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases for case reports, case series, cohort studies and clinical trials in humans published up to and including 19 September 2020. Thirteen articles were included in the qualitative analysis. Bone gain both horizontally and vertically was comparable to that obtained with other types of membranes more commonly used. The postoperative complication rate was higher that of native collagen membranes and non-resorbable titanium-reinforced membranes, and similar that of crosslinked collagen membranes and titanium meshes. The survival rate of the implants was similar to that of implants placed in native bone. Due to the limited scientific literature published on this issue, more randomized clinical trials comparing occlusive titanium barriers and other types of membranes are necessary to reach more valid conclusions.

scholarly journals Evaluation of 1-Ethyl-3-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl) Carbodiimide Cross-Linked Collagen Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration in Beagle Dogs

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 4599
Author(s):  
Jong-Ju Ahn ◽  
Hyung-Joon Kim ◽  
Eun-Bin Bae ◽  
Won-Tak Cho ◽  
YunJeong Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Strength ◽  
Physical Properties ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Enzymatic Degradation ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Collagen Membrane ◽  
Micro Computed Tomography ◽  
Collagen Membranes

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bone regeneration efficacy of an 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC)-cross-linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration (GBR). A non-cross-linked collagen membrane (Control group), and an EDC-cross-linked collagen membrane (Test group) were used in this study. In vitro, mechanical, and degradation testing and cell studies were performed. In the animal study, 36 artificial bone defects were formed in the mandibles of six beagles. Implants were inserted at the time of bone grafting, and membranes were assigned randomly. Eight weeks later, animals were sacrificed, micro-computed tomography was performed, and hematoxylin-eosin stained specimens were prepared. Physical properties (tensile strength and enzymatic degradation rate) were better in the Test group than in the Control group. No inflammation or membrane collapse was observed in either group, and bone volumes (%) in defects around implants were similar in the two groups (p > 0.05). The results of new bone areas (%) analysis also showed similar values in the two groups (p > 0.05). Therefore, it can be concluded that cross-linking the collagen membranes with EDC is the method of enhancing the physical properties (tensile strength and enzymatic degradation) of the collagen membranes without risk of toxicity.

The Role of Two Different Collagen Membranes for Dehiscence Defect Around Implants in Humans

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 445-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Woon Lee ◽  
Kyeong-Taek Kim ◽  
Yon-Soo Joo ◽  
Mi-Kyung Yoo ◽  
Jeoung-A Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Allogenic Bone ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Collagen Membranes ◽  
Dehiscence Defect ◽  
Result Analysis ◽  
Bone Particles

The aim of this study was to elucidate the role of 2 types of collagen membranes (cross-linked vs noncross-linked) used in conjunction with autogenous or allogenic bone followed by xenogeneic bone particles for dehiscence defect around implants in humans. Experimental groups were divided into 2 groups: Group CL (cross-linked, Ossix Plus, n = 24 implants, 16 patients) and Group NCL (noncross-linked, Bio-Gide, n = 25 implants, 18 patients). At the time of implant insertion and uncovery surgery, measurements of the dehiscence bony height, width, and surface area were made. Before applying the membrane to defects, guided bone regeneration was performed. Because it is difficult to measure the degree of exposure, early exposed cases were excluded from the result analysis. The mean percentage gain of the dehiscence defect and the mean marginal bone reduction value of follow-up radiograph did not show statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Both membranes exhibited satisfactory results on dehiscence defects. As a result, our authors concluded the success of guided bone regeneration was performed simultaneously for dehiscence defects around the implant, regardless whether collagen membranes were cross-linked or noncross-linked.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document