scholarly journals Application Modes Affect Two Universal Adhesive Systems’ Nanoleakage Expression and Shear Bond Strength

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
A. S. Bakry ◽  
M. A. Abbassy
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Silver Nitrate ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
The Self ◽  
Bonding Layer ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Hybrid Layer ◽  
Adhesive Interface ◽  
Bonding Systems ◽  
Self Etch

Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength and the nanoleakage expression of CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick and Tetric N-Bond adhesive systems bonded to dentin. Materials and Methods. 100 freshly extracted human premolar teeth were utilized. The teeth were sectioned to expose dentin. All dentin specimens were assigned into 4 experimental groups; 2 groups had Universal Bond Quick (Universalself group) and Tetric N-Bond (Tetricself group) applied in the self-etch mode, while 2 groups had Universal Bond Quick (Universaltotal group) and Tetric N-Bond (Tetrictotal group) applied in the total-etch mode. n = 15 for shear bond strength and n = 10 for nanoleakage experiment. One-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test were utilized to analyze the shear bond strength test and the nanoleakage expression, respectively. Results. The highest significant bond strength value was recorded by the Tetricself specimens ( p < 0.05 ) when compared to the remaining three groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the shear bond strength values recorded in the Tetrictotal, Universalself, and Universaltotal groups ( p < 0.05 ). Both bonding systems applied in the self-etch mode (Universalself, Tetricself) had no silver nitrate deposits in the hybrid layer and the hybrid layer-adhesive interface ( p < 0.001 ); however, both bonding systems applied in the total-etch mode (Universaltotal, Tetrictotal) had silver nitrate deposits in the hybrid layer, the hybrid layer-adhesive interface, and the bonding layer ( p < 0.001 ). Conclusion. Applying the Universal Bond Quick and Tetric N-Bond in the self-etch mode exhibited better results in terms of nanoleakage expression. Universal Bond Quick showed the stability of the shear bond strength to dentin when applied using the total-etch or self-etch modes. Tetric N-Bond showed significant deterioration in bond strength when applied in the total-etch mode and exhibited the highest bond strength when applied in the self-etch mode.

Bond Strength Comparison of Orthodontic Bonding Systems: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
pp. 20-26
Author(s):  
Tubayesha Hassan ◽  
MH Sattar
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Enamel Surface ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Scientific Review ◽  
Bonding System ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Bonding Systems ◽  
Self Etch

As a means of regular practice in orthodontics and aesthetic dentistry, resin based adhesive systems are being used exclusively. Keeping up with the ever-increasing demand for aesthetic dental treatment all over the world, newer and more improved adhesive systems have been developed. However, regarding the comparison as to which bonding system performs better in clinical perspective, there is lack of existing scientific review articles. In this review, we tend to explore the conventional etch and rinse bonding system and the self-etch primer bonding system. The different tests to assess and compare bond strength between these two types of adhesives from various bibliography are discussed. The results of shear bond strength test, adhesive remnant index (ARI), enamel-adhesive interface using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and the effect of saliva contamination and time are discussed. Interestingly, each system has its strengths and weaknesses. In shear bond strength, self-etch bonding systems clearly exhibits less strength than conventional bonding systems. Resin tags into enamel surface are shorter in self-etch primer adhesives which results from milder etching to enamel compared to the conventional aid-etch and rinse adhesives. Contrarily, the irreversible changes to enamel surface is more aggressive in conventional acid-etching which states that self-etching systems are better according to the principles of minimal intervention dentistry. Ban J Orthod & Dentofac Orthop, April 2017; Vol-7 (1-2), P.20-26

scholarly journals The Impact of Expasyl® Gingival Retraction Paste on the Bond Strength of Self-etch and Total-etch Systems

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 335-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeeshan H Ahmad ◽  
Sukumaran Anil ◽  
Alaa El Araby ◽  
Mohammad D Al Amri
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
The Self ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Lower Performance ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Self Etch

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the influence of Expasyl® gingival retraction paste on the shear bond strength of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems. Materials and methods Twenty-four specimens of extracted, caries-free, sound human molars were used in this study. The molars were then cut vertically into halves through the buccal and lingual cusps. Forty-eight specimens were divided into four groups (total-etch, total-etch with Expasyl application, self-etch, self-etch with Expasyl application) and the shear bond strength was tested. Results Expasyl significantly reduced the shear bond strength of the self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems. The self-etch system showed relatively lower performance compared with the total-etch adhesive system. The shear bond strength values of the total-etch adhesive without Expasyl showed the highest bond strength (21.48 ± 2.89), while the self-etching group adhesive treated with Expasyl showed the lowest shear bond strength value (14.89 ± 1.81). Conclusion From the observations of this in vitro study, it can be concluded that the use of Expasyl® gingival retraction system can negatively affect bond strength of adhesives. The total-etch system showed better compatibility to the Expasyl gingival retraction system than the self-etch. How to cite this article Al Baker AMA, El Araby A, Al Amri MD, Sukumaran A. The Impact of Expasyl® Gingival Retraction Paste on the Bond Strength of Self-etch and Total-etch Systems. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(5):335-339.

scholarly journals Rebonding of Orthodontic Brackets

2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 531-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona A. Montasser ◽  
James L. Drummond ◽  
Carla A. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Acid Etch ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Self Etch

Abstract Objective: To compare rebonding of orthodontic brackets based on the hypothesis that no difference would be found between the adhesive systems with respect to shear bond strength, mode of failure, and clinical failure rates. Materials and Methods: The three adhesive systems included two self-etch primers (Transbond and M-Bond) and a conventional phosphoric acid etch (Rely-a-Bond). The sample size was 20 premolars for each adhesive system. The shear bond strength was tested 24 hours after bracket bonding with the bonding/debonding procedures repeated two times after the first debonding. Bond strength, adhesive remnant index (ARI), and failure sites were evaluated for each debonding. Statistical analysis consisted of a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Scheffè analysis. The clinical portion evaluated 15 patients over a 12-month period. Results: The mean shear bond strengths after the first, second, and third debondings for Rely-a-Bond were 8.4 ± 1.8, 10.3 ± 2.4, and 14.1 ± 3.3 MPa, respectively; for Transbond 11.1 ± 4.6, 13.6 ± 4.5, and 12.9 ± 4.4 MPa, respectively; and for M-Bond 8.7 ± 2.7, 10.4 ± 2.4, and 12.4 ± 3.4 MPa, respectively. After the three debondings the mean shear bond strength increased significantly from the first to the third debonding for Rely-a-Bond and M-bond (P ≤ .001), but did not change for Transbond (P = .199). Conclusions: The original hypothesis is not rejected. The two self-etching primers showing higher or comparable bond strength to the conventional phosphoric etch with less adhesive remnant on the enamel surface after the first debonding. With repeated bonding/debonding, the differences in the bond strength, ARI, and failure site were not significantly different. There was no difference in the clinical performance of the three adhesive systems (P = .667).

scholarly journals Aplikasi klorheksidin glukonat 2%pada dentin tidak mempengaruhi kuat rekat geserkomposit resinyangmenggunakansistem adesif self etch (2% Chlorhexidine gluconate application on dentine does not affect bond strength of resin composite using self etch adhesive system)

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Dewi Puspitasari ◽  
Andi Soufyan ◽  
Ellyza Herda
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Group I ◽  
Self Etch

Composite resin is a widely used aesthetic restoration. The restoration can fail due to secondary caries. Chlorhexidinegluconate 2% is used as a cavity disinfectant to eliminate microorganisms on the prepared cavity and to prevent thesecondary caries. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of chlorhexidine gluconate 2% to the bondstrength of composite resin with self etch system adhesive on dentine. Sixteen specimens of buccal dentine of premolarscrown are divided into 2 different groups. Group I: Clearfil SE Bond self-etch primer was applied for 20 seconds,Clearfil SE Bond bonding was applied for 5 seconds and polymerized for 10 seconds. Composite resin was constructedincrementally and polymerized for 20 seconds. Group II: prior to self etch primer application as in group I,chlorhexidine gluconate 2% was applied for 15 seconds. Shear bond strength was tested using Testing machine andanalyzed with unpaired T test. The highest shear bond strength was obtained by applying chlorhexidine gluconate 2%.The study concludes that chlorhexidine gluconate 2% application to dentine did not affect significantly to the bondstrength composite resin using self etch adhesive systems.

Bond Strength and Quality of the Hybrid Layer of One-step Self-etch Adhesives Applied with Agitation on Dentin

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Amaral ◽  
R. Stanislawczuk ◽  
C. Zander-Grande ◽  
D. Gagler ◽  
A. Reis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Hybrid Layer ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
One Step ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Excellent Tool

Clinical Relevance Vigorous application on the dentin surface is an excellent tool capable of improving the immediate performance of simplified self-etch adhesive systems.

scholarly journals Analysis of micro-shear bond strength of self-etch adhesive systems with dentine: An in vitro study

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay Kumar Shakya ◽  
Rajeev Kumar Singh ◽  
Anjani Kumar Pathak ◽  
Balendra Pratap Singh ◽  
Anil Chandra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Self Etch

scholarly journals Siloranes–Suitability of a Novel Adhesive for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Lorenz Brauchli ◽  
Markus Steineck
Keyword(s):  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
The Self ◽  
Control Group ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Shear Testing ◽  
Orthodontic Bracket ◽  
Adhesive Interface

Recently, an epoxy-based resin-Filtek Silorane-has been proposed for restorative fillings. It was the aim of the investigation to evaluate the suitability of this novel resin for orthodontic bracket bonding on unground enamel. Shear bond strength was measured for two adhesives-Filtek Silorane, Transbond XT-in combination with steel, ceramic and polymer brackets. For Filtek Silorane etching was performed with the Silorane self-etching primer, as well as phosphoric acid. The Transbond XT samples were etched with phosphoric acid only and served as the control group. All samples were thermo-cycled (1000×, 5–55 °C). Shear testing was carried out with an Instron 3344. In addition, ARI scores were evaluated. The Shear bond strength showed a weak adhesion of Filtek Silorane to unprepared enamel, either with the self-etching primer or the conventional etching (0.87–4.28 MPa). The Shear bond strength of the control group was significantly higher (7.6–16.5 MPa). The ARI scores showed a clear failure at the enamel-adhesive interface for all Filtek Silorane samples. For the combination of Transbond XT and different brackets the failure was found at the adhesive–bracket interface. The novel epoxy-based resin Filtek Silorane is not appropriate for bracket bonding to unprepared enamel.

scholarly journals Bond Strength of a Novel One Bottle Multi-mode Adhesive to Human Dentin After Six Months of Storage

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 268-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Borguetti Manfroi ◽  
Maurem Leitão Marcondes ◽  
Deise Caren Somacal ◽  
Gilberto Antonio Borges ◽  
Luiz Henrique Burnett Júnior ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
The Self ◽  
Hybrid Layer ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Bond Stability ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Human Dentin ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Multi Mode

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of Scotchbond Universal to dentin using the etch-and-rinse or the self-etch technique after 24 h and 6 months of storage. Materials and Methods: Flat dentin surfaces were obtained in 24 third molars. The teeth were divided into four groups: G1 – Scotchbond Universal applied in the etch-and-rinse mode; G2 – Scotchbond Universal applied in the self-etch mode; G3 – Scotchbond Multi-Purpose; G4 – Clearfil SE Bond. A block of composite was built on the adhesive area. The tooth/resin sets were cut parallel to the long axis to obtain 40 beams (~0.8 mm2) for each group. Twenty specimens were immediately submitted to the µTBS test, and the remaining 20 were stored in water for 6 months. Failures and the adhesive interface were analyzed by SEM. Results: According to two-way ANOVA, the interaction between adhesive and storage time was significant (p=0.015).The µTBS (MPa) means were the following: 24 h – G1 (39.37±10.82), G2 (31.02±13.76), G3 (35.09±14.03) and G4 (35.84±11.06); 6 months – G1 (36.99±8.78), G2 (40.58±8.07), G3 (32.44±6.07) and G4 (41.75±8.25). Most failures were mixed. Evidence of hybrid layer and numerous resin tags were noted for Scotchbond Universal applied with the etch-and-rinse mode and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. A thinner hybrid layer and fewer resin tags were noted for Scotchbond Universal applied in the self-etch mode and Clearfil SE Bond. Conclusion: The results indicate that the µTBS for Scotchbond Universal is comparable to the gold-standard adhesives. Scotchbond Universal applied in the self-etch mode and Clearfil SE Bond revealed higher bond stability compared to the etch-and-rinse mode.

scholarly journals Using the Self-etch Adhesives in Anterior Restoration

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 421-424
Author(s):  
Osmir Batista de Oliveira Júnior ◽  
Marcelo Ferrarezi de Andrade ◽  
José Roberto Cury Saad ◽  
Edson Alves de Campos ◽  
Sizenando de Toledo Porto Neto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
The Self ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Direct Restoration ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Self Etch

ABSTRACT With the arrival of self-etch adhesives systems, there has been a rise in interest among clinicians, making it imperative for health professionals to have knowledge of the properties, characteristics, the association as well as the dental structures of these materials, in order to select them and use them correctly. The self-etch adhesive systems show good values of bond strength, microleakage and performance, and have therefore become an option in direct adhesive restorations. In the regard, this case study aims to describe the technique involving the use of selfetch adhesives system for direct restoration of anterior teeth. How to cite this article Tonetto MR, Kabbach W, de Campos EA, de Oliveira Junior OB, de Toledo Porto Neto S, Saad JRC, de Andrade MF. Using the Self-etch Adhesives in Anterior Restoration. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(3):421-424.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document