scholarly journals Push-Out Bond Strength, Characterization, and Ion Release of Premixed and Powder-Liquid Bioceramic Sealers with or without Gutta-Percha

Scanning ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Cristina Retana-Lobo ◽  
Mario Tanomaru-Filho ◽  
Juliane Maria Guerreiro-Tanomaru ◽  
Marianella Benavides-García ◽  
Erick Hernández-Meza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Calcium Ion ◽  
Ion Release ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Human Teeth ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Single Cone ◽  
Strength Characterization ◽  
Push Out

Objective. To evaluate the push-out bond strength of premixed and powder-liquid bioceramic sealers with or without gutta-percha (GP) cone. Materials and Methods. Radicular dentin samples were prepared from 80 single-rooted human teeth. After root canal preparation using ProTaper® and irrigation with NaOCl and EDTA, teeth were divided according to the root canal sealer ( n = 20 ): AH Plus®, EndoSequence® BC Sealer™, ProRoot® Endo Sealer, and BioRoot™ RCS. Samples were randomly divided into two subgroups ( n = 10 ): GP-S: root canal filling using the single-cone technique, or S: filling with only sealer. Specimens were kept at 37°C and 100% humidity in calcium-free PBS for 30 days. The push-out bond strength was measured in MPa. Fractured specimens were observed at 25x to evaluate the type of failure. pH and calcium ion release were measured at different experimental periods. Raman and SEM-EDAX analyses were performed for root canal sealers. Data were analysed using three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey test at a significance of P < 0.05 . Results. Push-out bond strength was greater for samples obturated with only sealers (S) than samples obturated with the single-cone technique (GP-S) ( P < 0.05 ). BioRoot™ RCS had greater bond strength than EndoSequence® BC Sealer™. Adhesive failures between cement and gutta-percha cone (87.5%) were predominant in the GP-S. Cohesive failures were predominant for S (80%). BioRoot™ RCS and ProRoot® ES presented higher alkalinization potential than the premixed sealer (EndoSequence® BC Sealer™). Powder-liquid bioceramic sealers (BioRoot™ RCS and ProRoot® ES) released the highest cumulative amount of calcium (28.46 mg/L and 20.05 mg/L). Conclusion. Push-out test without gutta-percha cone presents higher bond strength for bioceramic sealers. Powder-liquid calcium silicate-based sealers present greater bioactivity related to alkalinization potential and calcium ion release.

scholarly journals Influence of Root Canal Filling Techniques on Sealer Penetration and Bond Strength to Dentin

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 380-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana Martins Domingues de Macedo ◽  
Yara Silva-Sousa ◽  
Silvio Rocha Corrêa da Silva ◽  
Samantha Schaffer Pugsley Baratto ◽  
Flares Baratto-Filho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Laser Scanning Microscopy ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Single Cone ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Push Out

Abstract The influence of root canal filling techniques on the penetration of AH Plus into dentinal tubules was evaluated using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and the impact on the bond strength of the filling material on the root dentin was evaluated using the push-out test. Roots of the maxillary central incisors (n=40) were prepared with ProTaper Universal and assigned to four groups: lateral condensation, vertical compaction, modified Tagger hybrid and single cone. After root canal filling with gutta-percha and AH Plus, along with the addition of 0.01% fluorescein, the roots were cut into 2-mm slices. CLSM was performed on the first slice of each root third, followed by the push-out test. The second slice was analyzed under SEM. ANOVA demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the root canal filling techniques and the root thirds (p<0.05). For percent penetration, Tukey’s test showed that the vertical compaction (91.77±13.51), lateral condensation (89.18±10.91) and modified Tagger hybrid (87.53±15.42) presented the highest values, which significantly differed (p<0.05) from those of the single cone (78.19±22.46). For bond strength (MPa), lateral condensation (3.42±0.54) and vertical compaction (3.47±0.53) had the highest values (p<0.05), while the modified Tagger hybrid (2.19±0.41) and single cone (0.54±0.21) had the lowest. In conclusion, the lateral condensation, vertical compaction and Modified Tagger’s hybrid techniques resulted in greater penetration and bond strength to the intra-radicular dentin.

scholarly journals Influence of Sealer Placement Technique on the Quality of Root Canal Filling by Lateral Compaction or Single Cone

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Simionatto Guinesi ◽  
Gisele Faria ◽  
Mario Tanomaru-Filho ◽  
Idomeo Bonetti-Filho
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Single Cone ◽  
Digital Microscope ◽  
Placement Technique

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the sealer placement technique on the quality of root canal filling using Lateral Compaction (LC) or Single Cone (SC). In order to do that, 60 mesial roots of mandibular first molars were prepared and divided into 2 groups (n=30), according to the filling technique: LC and SC. Each group was subdivided into 3 subgroups (n=10), according to the different sealer placement methods: A: Master gutta-percha (GP) cone; B: Lentulo spiral; C: File. The roots were sectioned at 2, 4 and 6 mm from the apex and photographed with the aid of a digital microscope. Then, areas of GP, endodontic sealer and voids were measured, and these data were subjected to statistical analysis. LC technique showed no statistically difference (p>0.05) in the percentage of GP area, sealer and voids between the subgroups at any of the three levels. After use of SC, higher percentages of sealer area were found at all levels (p<0.01) when the sealer was placed with a file. At 2 mm, higher percentage of void areas (p<0.05) was observed when the cone was used, lower percentage with K-file and the lowest percentage with Lentulo. At 4 mm, cone showed higher percentage of void areas (p<0.05). At 6 mm, there were no significant differences (p>0.05) between the three methods. Considering these results, using an instrument for sealer placement was important in the SC technique to reduce voids. Regarding LC, the sealer placement techniques provided similar results.

scholarly journals An In Vitro Assessment of Gutta-Percha Coating of New Carrier-Based Root Canal Fillings

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raghad Abdulrazzaq Alhashimi ◽  
Richard Foxton ◽  
Shihab Romeed ◽  
Sanjukta Deb
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Microcomputed Tomography ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Orthodontic Wire ◽  
In Vitro Assessment ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Push Out

The first aim of this paper was to evaluate the push-out bond strength of the gutta-percha coating of Thermafil and GuttaCore and compare it with that of gutta-percha used to coat an experimental hydroxyapatite/polyethylene (HA/PE) obturator. The second aim was to assess the thickness of gutta-percha around the carriers of GuttaCore and HA/PE obturators using microcomputed tomography (μCT). Ten (size 30) 1 mm thick samples of each group (Thermafil, GuttaCore, and HA/PE) were prepared. An orthodontic wire with a diameter of 0.5 mm was attached to the plunger of an Instron machine in order to allow the push-out testing of the gutta-percha coating. Five samples of (GuttaCore and HA/PE) were scanned usingμCT. The data obtained were analysed with one-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test. HA/PE obturators exhibited significantly higher push-out bond strength (P<0.001) determined at 6.84 ± 0.96 than those of Guttacore around 3.75 ± 0.75 and Thermafil at 1.5 ± 0.63. GuttaCore demonstrated significantly higher bond strength than Thermafil (P<0.001).μCT imaging revealed that the thickness of gutta-percha around the experimental HA/PE carrier was homogeneously distributed. The bondability and thickness of gutta-percha coating around HA/PE carriers were superior to those of GuttaCore and Thermafil obturators.

scholarly journals Effect of exposure to etidronic acid on the bond strength of calcium silicate-based cements after 1 and 21 days: an in vitro study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Rebolloso de Barrio ◽  
Juan José Pérez-Higueras ◽  
Ernesto García-Barbero ◽  
Lucía Gancedo-Caravia
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Calcium Silicate ◽  
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid ◽  
Setting Time ◽  
Etidronic Acid ◽  
Human Teeth ◽  
Root Canal Irrigants ◽  
Push Out

Abstract Background After reparation of root perforations with calcium silicate-based cements (CSBC), the surface of the material is expected to be exposed to root canal irrigants (RCI) while resuming the root canal treatment. Methods The aim of this study was to compare the effect of exposure to a mixture of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and etidronic acid (HEBP) or other irrigants on the Push Out Bond Strength (POBS) of CSBC after two different setting times. 240 root slices 1 mm thick were obtained from single-rooted human teeth. A 1.4 mm diameter perforation was performed on each slice and filled with Biodentine (BD) or ProRoot MTA (PMTA). After 1 or 21 days they were exposed to 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 5.25% NaOCl, a mixture of 5.25% NaOCl and 9% HEBP (NaOCl + HEBP) or saline (n = 15) and submitted to a push-out test. POBS results were analysed with ANOVA and Tukey tests. Results BD showed higher POBS than PMTA after 1 day (p < .05). After 21 days no differences were found between materials. After 1 day exposure to NaOCl + HEBP resulted in higher POBS, compared to the other irrigants (p < .05). Conclusion POBS results are influenced by the cement, the setting time and the exposure to irrigants.

scholarly journals Endodontic sealers and post-endodontic waiting time affect the bond strength of the fiber posts

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thais Camponogara BOHRER ◽  
Patricia Eliana FONTANA ◽  
Vinícius Felipe WANDSCHER ◽  
Victor Hugo Carvalho MORARI ◽  
Rafael PILLAR ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Waiting Time ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Endodontic Sealers ◽  
Push Out

Abstract Introduction The resistance adhesive of a fiber post can be affected by several factors, such as the endodontic sealer and post-endodontic waiting time. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different endodontic sealers and two different post-endodontic waiting times on the bond strength of fiber posts. Material and method Seventy-two bovine teeth were endodontically treated and filled using three endodontic sealers: eugenol-based, epoxy resin-based, or mineral trioxide aggregate-based. The specimens were stored at 37°C for 24 hours or for 30 months. After the respective storage times, the root canals were prepared for luting fiber posts using RelyX U200. Push-out tests and analysis of failures were performed. The push-out data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance to compare the effects of the endodontic sealer and with the t-test to compare the effects of post-endodontic waiting time. Result The AH Plus sealer yielded the highest bond strength values at 30 months post-endodontics (11.26 Mpa) (p < 0.05), however no had difference with Endofill sealer at the same time. Endofill and MTA Fillapex sealers did not differ significantly in their effects, irrespective of the post-endodontic waiting time. Conclusion In conclusion, the endodontic sealer used and post-endodontic waiting time affect the adhesive resistance of fiber posts. The adhesion increases significantly when the fiber post is cemented 30 months after the root canal filling, while the adhesion is reduced when cementing immediately after root canal treatment, in particular for eugenol-based endodontic sealers.

scholarly journals Push-Out Bond Strength of Experimental Apatite Calcium Phosphate Based Coated Gutta-Percha

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afaf Y. Al-Haddad ◽  
Muralithran G. Kutty ◽  
Zeti Adura Che Ab Aziz
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Mode ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Test Machine ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Cohesive Failure ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Push Out

Objectives. To evaluate the push-out bond strength of experimental apatite calcium phosphate coated gutta-percha (HAGP) compared to different commercially available coated gutta-percha root obturation points. Methods. Extracted teeth were selected and instrumented using ProTaper rotary files. The canals were assigned into five equal groups and obturated using matching single cone technique as follows: EndoREZ cones and EndoREZ sealer, Bioceramic Endosequence gutta-percha (BCGP) with Endosequence BC sealer, Active GP with Endosequence BC sealer (ActiV GP), conventional GP with Endosequence BC sealer, and HAGP with Endosequence BC sealer. Each root was sectioned transversally at the thickness of 1±0.1 mm to obtain 5 sections (n=25 per group). The specimens were subjected to push-out test using a Universal Test Machine at a loading speed of 0.5 mm/ min. Failure modes after push-out test was examined under stereomicroscope and the push-out data were analyzed using ANOVA and the post hoc Dunnett T3 test (p = 0.05). Results. The highest mean bond strength was yielded by HAGP followed by BCGP, ActiV GP, conventional GP, and EndoREZ. There were significant differences between EndoREZ and all other groups (p<0.001). The prominent failure mode of HAGP was mixed mode, whereas EndoREZ exhibited adhesive failure mode. Conventional GP, ActiV GP, and BCGP showed cohesive failure mode. Conclusion. HAGP showed promising results to be used as root canal filling material in combination with bioceramic sealer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document