scholarly journals Immediate Placement and Restoration of a New Tapered Implant System in the Aesthetic Region: A Report of Three Cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Caroliene M. Meijndert ◽  
Gerry M. Raghoebar ◽  
Arjan Vissink ◽  
Henny J. A. Meijer
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
One Year ◽  
Implant System

Objective. To assess the clinical, radiographic, aesthetic, and patient-centred outcomes of a new implant system applied for an immediate implant placement and restoration approach in single tooth replacement of anterior maxillary teeth. Material and Method. Three cases were treated with a bone level tapered implant. All patients were treated with the same strategy involving flapless extraction and implant placement with simultaneous augmentation. Implants were provisionally restored with a screw-retained restoration at the day of surgery. Definitive restoration was fabricated after 3 months. Follow-up was one year after definitive restoration. Results. At the 1-year follow-up, the implants were stable and no complications had occurred. Peri-implant bone levels had increased with a mean value of 0.24±0.30 mm between definitive restoration placement and 1 year of follow-up. Clinical outcome scores showed healthy soft tissues. Mean Pink and White Esthetic scores were rated 7.0 and 7.3, respectively. Mean patient satisfaction had improved from 55.7 (pretreatment) to 90.0 (1-year follow-up) on a 0-100 VAS scale. Conclusion. Immediate implant placement and restoration with the new tapered bone level implant system are accompanied by good initial clinical and radiographic results as well as high patient satisfaction.

scholarly journals Immediate Implant Placement by Interradicular Bone Drilling before Molar Extraction: Clinical Case Report with One-Year Follow-Up

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuardo Valenzuela ◽  
José M. Olivares ◽  
Nicolás Weiss ◽  
Dafna Benadof
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rates ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Primary Stability ◽  
Bone Drilling ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implants ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
One Year ◽  
Molar Extraction

The placement of immediate implants in the posterior sector is a widespread procedure where the success and survival rates are similar to those of traditional protocols. It has several anatomical challenges, such as the presence of interradicular bone septa that hinder a correct three-dimensional positioning of the implant and may compromise primary stability and/or cause damage of neighboring structures. The aim of this article is to present the treatment and the one-year clinical follow-up of a patient who received immediate implant placement using an interradicular bone-drilling technique before the molar extraction.

scholarly journals Five-Year Follow-up of an Immediate Implant Placement in the Aesthetic Zone

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-79
Author(s):  
Bhageshwar Dhami ◽  
Priti Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Maxillary Central Incisor ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Surgical Extraction ◽  
Immediate Implants ◽  
Tissue Changes ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
The Aesthetic

Immediate implants are placed in the site of surgical extraction of the tooth to be replaced. The percentage success of such procedures varies among authors from 94-100%. Immediate implant placement is most commonly indicated when tooth extraction is done with pathologies not amenable to treatment. The advantages include reduced post-extraction alveolar bone resorption, shortened treatment time, and the avoidance of a second surgical intervention with regard to delayed implantation. This report describes a case of immediate implant placed in a maxillary central incisor followed by evaluation of soft and hard tissue changes occurring during post-operative period with a follow-up at five years.

scholarly journals Immediate Dental Implant Placements Using Osteotome Technique: A Case Report and Literature Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 367-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saad Al-Almaie
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implant ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Bone Expansion ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
One Year ◽  
Functional Loading

This clinical case describes the effect of the osteotome technique on the osseointegration of a mandibular dental implant in a 42-year-old female patient with dento-alveolar bony defects and to review the literature regarding immediate implant placement using osteotome technique. The amount of bone expansion at the alveolar ridge and the marginal bone resorption from the time of implant placement to one year after the implant’s functional loading were recorded clinically. The esthetic outcome for the restored implant (the gingival margin) was achieved one years after the implant’s functional loading. The surgical and prosthetic sites for the implant showed no postoperative complications, and no infection or wound dehiscence was recorded during the follow-up period. The osteotome technique is good for the purpose for which it was introduced, and its advantages with immediate implant placement include reduced surgical trauma and a shorter treatment time.

Evaluation of Peri-implant Tissue Stability and Patient Satisfaction After Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Area: A 3-Year Follow-up of an Ongoing Prospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 731-739
Author(s):  
Albert Barroso-Panella ◽  
Octavi Ortiz-Puigpelat ◽  
Pablo Altuna-Fistolera ◽  
Ernest Lucas-Taulé ◽  
Federico Hernández-Alfaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Esthetic Area

scholarly journals Modified Procedure in a Socket-Shield technique in the aesthetic zone - Case report

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hélder Moura
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Socket Preservation ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Soft Tissue Volume ◽  
Dental Rehabilitation ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
Atraumatic Extraction

Purposes: After tooth extraction alveolar socket bone undergoes a remodelling process. The horizontal and the vertical bone losses complicate dental rehabilitation with implants. Socket-Shield technique maintain the periodontal attachment including cementum, periodontal ligament and bundle bone. In this report this technique was indicated to replace the lost teeth. Case report: A socket shield technique was used for immediate implant placement on a non-restorable teeth by failure of crowns in teeth 12, 11 and 21. Through a osteotomy and manipulation of soft tissues with provisionals it was possible to correct the gingival contours and zeniths. Conclusions: Atraumatic extraction and socket preservation technique decreases the alveolar bone resorption by maintaining the hard and the soft tissue volume. Provisionalization allows management of the soft tissues around the implants. This treatment offers a predictable aesthetic and functional result .

scholarly journals Immediate Implants Loading by 4 Units Temporary Restoration: A Case Report

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Immediate Loading ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implants ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Dental Professionals

Immediate implant placement is the placement of dental implant in the extraction socket immediately after extraction with no healing of bone or soft tissues. The timing of implant placement has increased the debate, while patients have become persistent in their desire to be treated in an efficient and expedient manner. When seeking a solution, they wish for safe and effective treatment that can be performed in the shortest possible time and with as little pain and discomfort as possible. Dental professionals with their expertise are addressing patients request as much as possible. Immediate implant placement and loading are valuable techniques for the clinician to call upon, but their skill and experience, as well as case selection, are all crucial elements to ensure successful long-term results [1]. The placement of implants immediately in fresh sockets with immediate loading is a well known treatment modality, but the practitioner has to follow a very strict protocol. This case report describes the detailed procedures of immediate implant placement with immediate loading for 2 – implants supporting 4 – units’ provisional restorations with 5 years follow-up

scholarly journals Allograft and Collagen Membrane Augmentation Procedures Preserve the Bone Level around Implants after Immediate Placement and Restoration

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roni Kolerman ◽  
Nayrouz Qahaz ◽  
Eitan Barnea ◽  
Eitan Mijiritsky ◽  
Liat Chaushu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Collagen Membrane ◽  
Hard Tissue ◽  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Freeze Dried ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Immediate Implant

Background: Immediate implant placement and restoration (IPR), is a reliable treatment modality. Purpose: This historical prospective study evaluated the medium-term outcomes of hard tissue after IPR in the anterior maxilla with simultaneous hard tissue augmentation. Methods: Seventy-three patients treated with single-implant IPR in the anterior maxilla were followed for 1-8 years. Treatment involved, atraumatic extraction, immediate implant placement and abutment adaptation, followed by simultaneous augmentation with mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) particles to fill the gaps and restore the ridge. The surgical site was stabilized with a resorbable collagen membrane, followed by the connection of an acrylic provisional restoration. Results: All implants osseointegrated during the follow-up period (mean, 34 ± 22 months). Radiographic evaluation of the distance between the implant shoulder (IS) and crestal bone level (CBL) was of 0.86 ± 0.86 mm and 0.8 ± 0.84 mm mesially and distally, respectively. Splitting the results into up to 3 years and 3–8 years of follow-up data, the corresponding values were 0.90 ± 0.83 and 0.68 ± 0.88 for the mesial aspect and 0.99 ± 0.87and 0.74 ± 0.83 for the distal aspect, respectively. Mean peri-implant probing depth was 3.63 mm (SD ± 1.06) and 16 implants (22%) presented at least one bleeding pocket of ≥5 mm (peri implant mucositis). Conclusions: The immediate replacement of a single maxillary tooth by implants combined with guided bone regeneration is a predictable treatment modality with favorable peri-implant bony response.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document