scholarly journals Comparison of the Effects of TIPS versus BRTO on Bleeding Gastric Varices: A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zi Wen Wang ◽  
Jin Chao Liu ◽  
Fang Zhao ◽  
Wen Guang Zhang ◽  
Xu Hua Duan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatic Encephalopathy ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Gastric Varices ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Rebleeding Rate

Background and Aim. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a threat to patients with gastric varices (GVs). Previous studies have concluded that both transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) are effective treatments for patients with GV. We aimed to compare the efficiency and outcomes of these two procedures in GV patients through meta-analysis. Methods. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched using the keywords: GV, bleeding, TIPS, and BRTO to identify relevant randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. The overall survival (OS) rate, imminent haemostasis rate, rebleeding rate, technical success rate, procedure complication rate (hepatic encephalopathy and aggravated ascites), and Child-Pugh score were evaluated. Randomized clinical trials and cohort studies comparing TIPS and BRTO for GV due to portal hypertension were included in our meta-analysis. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and assessed the study quality. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs), and 95% CIs using random effects models. Results. A total of nine studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There was a significant difference between TIPS and BRTO in the OS rate (RR, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.98); P=0.03) and rebleeding rate (RR, 2.61 (95% CI, 1.75 to 3.90); P<0.00001). TIPS had a higher incidence rate of hepatic encephalopathy (RR, 16.11 (95% CI, 7.13 to 36.37); P<0.00001). There was no significant difference between TIPS and BRTO in the immediate haemostasis rate (RR, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.10); P=0.84), technical success rate (RR, 1.06 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.16); P=0.16), aggravated ascites rate (RR, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.33 to 1.09); P=0.10), or Child-Pugh change (MD, 0.22 (95% CI, −0.21 to 0.65); P=0.31). Conclusions. In this meta-analysis, BRTO brought more benefits to patients, with a higher OS rate and lower rebleeding rate. BRTO is a feasible method for GVB.

scholarly journals Efficacy of high-pressure balloon for the treatment of arteriovenous fistula stenosis: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Li ◽  
Wenhao Cui ◽  
Jukun Wang ◽  
Chao Zhang ◽  
Tao Luo
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistula ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Stenosis Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis ◽  
Using Data ◽  
The Cochrane Library

AbstractObjectiveThe objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of high-pressure balloon (HPB) versus conventional balloon angioplasty (BA) in treating arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenosis.Materials and MethodsA meta-analysis was conducted using data acquired from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, SinoMed, CNKI, WanFang and VIP databases from the time the databases were established to November 2020. All analyses included in the studies comprised the subgroups of HPB and BA. The patency of AVF was compared between the two groups at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after operation.ResultsNine studies comprising 475 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results revealed that stenosis rate of AVFs treated with HPB was significantly lower than that of AVFs treated with conventional balloon at 3 months (OR= 0.37, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.67, p<0.001) and 6 months after operation (OR= 0.33, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.75, p=0.008). In addition, the technical success rate of HPB groups was high (OR= 0.14, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.35, p<0.001). However, no significant difference was observed between the experimental and control groups at 12 months after operation (OR= 0.61, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.25, p=0.18). No significant publication bias was observed in the analyses.ConclusionHPB is a potential primary option for the treatment of AVF stenosis, with a lower 3- and 6-month stenosis rate than BA. However, the long-term effect of HPB was not satisfactory; therefore, further research should be conducted to elucidate the relationship between the two groups.

Abstract 16680: Endovascular Therapy of Svc Syndrome-a Systematic Review

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Hussain Azizi ◽  
Irfan Shafi ◽  
Matthew Zhao ◽  
Vladimir Lakhter ◽  
Riyaz Bashir
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Restenosis Rate ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Svc Syndrome

Background: Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is caused by the occlusion of the SVC and can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Recently, endovascular therapy (ET) has become the standard of care for majority of these patients. We performed a systematic review of available literature to assess the contemporary technical success rate, restenosis rate, and recurrence rate of SVC syndrome following endovascular intervention. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from 1988 to 2019 for studies on Endovascular Therapy for SVC syndrome. After screening 709 records, 13 studies were included. Screening was conducted using Rayyan QCRI software for systemic reviews. Studies included full-length journal articles on SVC syndrome and ET among adults (18+ years). Case reports, or case series with <20 patients were excluded. Data analysis was performed using OpenMeta software. Proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random effects models. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Q and I 2 statistics. We evaluated the end-points of the technical success, restenosis rate and recurrence rates in SVC syndrome patients after endovascular stenting Results: A meta-analysis of 13 studies included a total of 1024 patients. The results of our meta-analysis show a weighted technical success rate of 98.6% (95% CI 0.97 – 0.99) (Fig. 1A), restenosis rate of 11.8% (95 CI 0.08-0.14) (Fig 1B) and recurrence rate of 9.9% (95% CI 0.06-0.13) (Fig 1C). Our studies had a substantial heterogeneity (I 2 ) of 52-80%. Figures:Figure 1A Figure 1B Figure 1C Conclusions: Our systematic review revealed high technical success rate, low restenosis, and recurrence rates after endovascular therapy supporting the paradigm of endovascular therapy as first line treatment for patients with SVC syndrome. Disclosures: Dr. Bashir has equity interest in Thrombolex Inc.

Comparison between Ologen implant and Mitomycin C in trabeculectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Liu ◽  
Yali Du ◽  
Min Lei ◽  
Leyi Zhuang ◽  
Peng Lv
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Collagen Matrix ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
Alternative Choice

Abstract Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the biodegradable collagen matrix (Ologen) implant in trabeculectomy. Research design and methods We searched Pubmed, Cochrane library, Embase and Web of Science databases to find studies that met our pre-stated inclusion criteria. Reference lists of retrieved articles were also reviewed. The search was finished by February 2019. Study selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and data analyses were performed according to the Cochrane standards. Either a fixed or a random-effects model was used to calculate the overall combined risk estimates. The efficacy measures were the weighted mean differences (WMDs) for the intraocular pressure reduction (IOPR) and the glaucoma medications reduction, the odds ratio (OR) for the success rate and adverse events. Results Fifteen randomized controlled trials involved 682 eyes were included in the meta-analysis. There were no statistically differences between two groups in the IOPR at any time postoperatively. The MD of the IOPR was [MD= -0.45,95% Confidence Interval (CI), (-2.36,1.46), P=0.65] at one day, [MD= -0.82,95% CI, (-1.97, 0.33), P=0.16] at one week, [MD= -1.33, 95% CI,(-3.12, 0.47), P=0.15] at one month, [MD= 0.11,95% CI, (-1.87, 2.08), P=0.92] at three months, [MD= -0.60,95% CI, (-2.27, 1.06), P=0.48] at six months, [MD= -0.33,95% CI, (-1.99, 1.32), P=0.69] at one year, [MD= -0.13,95% CI, (-1.90, 1.65), P=0.89] at two years, [MD= 2.54,95% CI, (-2.83, 7.90), P=0.35] at three years, [MD= 3.04,95% CI, (-3.95, 10.03), P=0.39] at five years. There was no statistically significant difference between the Ologen groups and MMC groups concerned the complete success rate [OR=1.19, 95%CI, (0.83, 1.71), P=0.35]. With regard to the adverse events, no obvirously significance was observed. Seven studies reported the change of antiglaucoma medications. We found that the change of antiglaucoma medications is higher in MMC groups than that in Ologen groups [MD=-0.18, 95%CI, (-0.33, -0.03), P=0.02]. There is no significant difference in complications between the two groups. Conclusions From the current evidence, Ologen may be an alternative choice for trabeculectomy when considering the efficacy and safety. However, MMC might be the preferred choice concerned cost-effectiveness.

Comparison of conservative treatment with appendectomy for acute uncomplicated pediatric appendicitis: a meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 767-780
Author(s):  
Le-wee Bi ◽  
Bei-lei Yan ◽  
Qian-yu Yang ◽  
Hua-lei Cui
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Aim: We aimed to compare conservative treatment with surgery for uncomplicated pediatric appendicitis to estimate effectiveness and safety. Methods: Data recorded until September 2018 were searched, and relevant academic articles from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and other libraries were selected. STATA version 13.0 (Stata Corporation, TX, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Results: We identified nine eligible papers. The study reported a significant difference in the success rate of treatment in 1 month and in 1 year, and no difference in the incidence of complications. The patients with fecaliths showed low treatment efficacy in conservative treatment group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Standardized conservative treatment as inpatients for pediatric appendicitis is safe and feasible. Appendectomy was the better choice for patients with fecaliths.

scholarly journals Endoscopic biliary self-expandable metallic stent in malignant biliary obstruction with or without sphincterotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. E26-E35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedetto Mangiavillano ◽  
Amedeo Montale ◽  
Leonardo Frazzoni ◽  
Mario Bianchetti ◽  
Amrita Sethi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stent Insertion ◽  
Metallic Stent ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Expandable Metallic Stent ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background and aim To assess the rate of adverse events and the technical success rate of biliary stenting with or without EBS.  Methods A literature search up to February 2017 was performed. Studies assessing adverse events (AEs) and technical success rates of stenting with or without EBS were considered. Results Seven studies (870 patients; 12 treatment arms) were included. Early AEs, i. e. those occurring within 30 days, were significantly lower in no-EBS vs. EBS-group (11 % vs. 20.1 %; OR: 0.36, 95 %CI: 0.13 – 1.00). Rates of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis were not significantly different in the two groups (no-EBS vs. EBS: 6.1 % vs 5 %; OR: 1.33, 95 %CI: 0.68 – 2.59). The rate of bleeding was significantly lower in patients without EBS (no-EBS vs EBS: 0 % vs 5 %; OR: 0.12, 95 % CI: 0.03 – 0.45). Rates of cholangitis were significantly lower in patients without EBS (no-EBS vs. EBS: 3.3 % vs. 7.4 %; OR: 0.38, 95 %CI: 0.17 – 0.83). Both late AEs and mortality rates did not significantly differ between no-EBS and EBS patients (19.9 % vs. 18.9 %; OR: 0.93, 95 %CI: 0.56 – 1.53, and 2.5 % vs. 2.9 %; OR: 1.18, 95 %CI: 0.22 – 6.29, respectively). The technical success rate for stent insertion also did not differ (98 % vs. 97.6 %; OR: 1.05, 95 %CI: 0.42 – 2.63). Conclusion EBS seems to be associated, in the first 30 days after the procedure, with an increased risk of cholangitis and bleeding. No difference was observed in the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of tracheal stents removal under fluoroscopy guidance: comparison of tracheal fistulas with tracheal stenosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghua Bi ◽  
Jianzhuang Li ◽  
Liangliang Bai ◽  
Gang Wu ◽  
Xinwei Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Tracheal Stenosis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Stent Removal ◽  
Total Incidence ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Routine Removal ◽  
Fluoroscopy Guidance

Abstract Background: No study compared the techniques and complications of stent removal under fluoroscopy guidance for tracheal fistula and tracheal stenosis.Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 152 patients who underwent fluoroscopy-guided stent removal from January 2011 to June 2017. Eighty-five patients underwent stent removal for tracheal fistula (TF group), and 67 patients for tracheal stenosis (TS group). All patients underwent tracheal CT scans before stent removal and during follow up. The technical success rate, complications, survival rate were compared between the two groups.Results: The technical success rate of stent removal was 98.9% and 97.4% for tracheal fistula and tracheal stenosis, respectively. Except for the routine removal for half of patients, excessive granulation tissue was the common indications for stent removal, which was found 142.1±25.9 days later for tracheal fistula, and 89.9±15.0 day for tracheal stenosis. The total incidence of complications was 21.1% and 22.4% for tracheal fistula and tracheal stenosis, respectively. One perioperative death of asphyxia was found in TF group, and 2 deaths in TS group. Recurrence of fistula or stenosis requiring stenting was the most comment complication in both groups. The 0.5-, 3-, 6-year survival rates were 90.3%, 59.6%, and 36.1% for TF group, and 80.4%, 75.7%, 75.7% for TS group.Conclusions: Fluoroscopic removal of tracheal stent is safe and effective for both tracheal fistula and tracheal stenosis, with no significant difference. Recurrence of fistula or stenosis requiring stenting was the most comment complication.

scholarly journals Ultrasound-guided lung biopsy with coaxial technique: pleural contact length affects the occurrence of pneumothorax after first puncture

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rinpei Imamine ◽  
Takeshi Kubo ◽  
Keizo Akuta ◽  
Hisato Kobayashi ◽  
Yoshiharu Yamamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Lung Biopsy ◽  
Regression Tree ◽  
Contact Length ◽  
Classification And Regression Tree ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pleural Contact

Abstract Purpose To assess prebiopsy characteristics influencing the occurrence of pneumothorax after first puncture of ultrasound (US)-guided lung biopsy with coaxial technique. Materials and methods From January 2007 to September 2018, 180 peripheral lung lesions in 174 patients who underwent B-mode US-guided lung biopsy with coaxial technique at single institution were included in this study. Technical success was defined as the ability to make a diagnosis using the acquired sample with/without an adverse event of pneumothorax. Statistical analyses of prebiopsy characteristics were performed to identify the most important cutpoint and to evaluate the effect on diagnostic accuracy. Results Of the 180 lesions (mean size, 37 mm ± 26.2; mean pleural contact length, 38.2 mm ± 34.4), technical success rate was 97.2% (175/180 lesions) and diagnostic accuracy rate was 91.6% (165/180 lesions). Pneumothorax occurred immediately after first puncture for seven of 180 lesions. Classification and regression tree analysis and Fisher’s exact test showed the proportion of the pneumothorax immediately after first puncture was higher in lesions with pleural contact length less than 9.78 mm (p = 0.002). No significant difference was shown between the pneumothorax and non-pneumothorax after first puncture in technical success and final diagnosis success rate. Conclusion Pleural contact length affects the occurrence of pneumothorax after first puncture of US-guided lung biopsy with coaxial technique.

scholarly journals Efficacy of High-Pressure Balloon for the Treatment of Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 152660282110586
Author(s):  
Yu Li ◽  
Wenhao Cui ◽  
Jukun Wang ◽  
Chao Zhang ◽  
Tao Luo
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistula ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Restenosis Rate ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Meta Analyses

Objective: The objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of high-pressure balloon (HPB) versus conventional balloon (CB) angioplasty in treating arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenosis. Materials and Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted using data acquired from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, SinoMed, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases from the time the databases were established to December 2020. All analyses included in the studies comprised the subgroups of HPB and CB. The patency rates of AVF were compared between 2 groups at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation. Results: Seven studies comprising 364 patients were included in the meta-analyses. The pooled results revealed that restenosis rate of AVFs treated with HPB was significantly lower than that of AVFs treated with CB at 3 months (odds ratio [OR] = 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.16 to 0.61, p<0.001) and 6 months after operation (OR= 0.29, 95% CI = 0.11 to 0.79, p = 0.01). In addition, the technical success rate of HPB groups was higher (OR = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.05 to 0.36, p<0.001). However, no significant difference was observed between HPB and CB groups at 12 months after operation (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.30 to 1.52, p = 0.35). No significant publication bias was observed in the analyses. Conclusion: High-pressure balloon is a potential option for the treatment of AVF stenosis, with a lower 3- and 6-month restenosis rate than CB. However, 12-month patency rate of HPB was not superior to CB. Therefore, further studies should be conducted to investigate the mechanisms of restenosis after angioplasty.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of fluoroscopy-guided tracheal stents removal under fluoroscopy guidance: comparison of tracheal fistulas and tracheal stenosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghua Bi ◽  
Jindong Li ◽  
Liangliang Bai ◽  
Xinwei Han ◽  
Jianzhuang Ren
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Tracheal Stenosis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Stent Removal ◽  
Total Incidence ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Endoscopic removal is the most common method for removal of tracheal stents. Few studies have reported the technique of fluoroscopy-guided stent removal for tracheal fistula and tracheal stenosis. We aimed to study the safety and efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided stent removal as well as the optimal duration for stent usage.Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 152 patients who underwent fluoroscopy-guided stent removal from January 2011 to June 2017. Reasons for stent implantation were tracheal fistula in 85 patients (TF group), and tracheal stenosis in 67 patients (TS group). All patients underwent tracheal CT scans before stent removal and during follow up. The technical success rate, complications, and survival rate were compared between the two groups.Results: The technical success rate of stent removal was 98.9% and 97.4%, respectively for the TF and TS group. Removal was routine for half of patients, and in the remainder, excessive granulation tissue was the common indications for stent removal, which was found after stenting at 142.1±25.9 days in the TF group, and at 89.9±15.0 day in the TS group. The total incidence of complications was 21.1% and 22.4%, respectively, for the TF and TS groups. Perioperative death occurred in one patient in the TF group, and two patients in the TS group. Recurrence of fistula or stenosis requiring re-stenting was the most comment complication in both groups. The 0.5-, 3-, 6-year survival rates were 90.3%, 59.6%, and 36.1% for TF group, and 80.4%, 75.7%, 75.7% for TS group.Conclusions: Fluoroscopic removal of tracheal stents is safe and effective for both tracheal fistula and tracheal stenosis, with no significant difference in outcomes. Recurrence of fistula or stenosis requiring re-stenting was the most common complication.

scholarly journals Non-catecholamine vasopressors in the treatment of adult patients with septic shock—evidence from meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhong ◽  
Xiao-Wei Ji ◽  
Hai-Li Wang ◽  
Guang-Ming Zhao ◽  
Qing Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Favorable Result ◽  
Digital Ischemia ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Shock Reversal ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Norepinephrine (NE) has currently been the first-choice vasopressor in treating septic shock despite generally insufficient for patients with refractory septic shock. The aim of this update meta-analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of a combination of non-catecholamine vasopressors (vasopressin/pituitrin/terlipressin/selepressin/angiotensin II) and NE versus NE in managing adult septic shock patients. Methods We conducted this study of literatures published from the inception to April 30, 2020, using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases without language restriction. Randomized controlled trials comparing NE with non-catecholamine vasopressors among adult septic shock patients were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled effects of relative risk (RR) or standard mean difference (SMD) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results Twenty-three studies covering 4380 participants were finally enrolled. The combined analysis of non-catecholamine vasopressors resulted in a nonsignificant reduction in 90-day/ICU/hospital mortality except for a decreased in 28-day mortality (n = 4217; RR, 0.92; 95% CI 0.86–0.99; P = 0.02). This favorable result was subsequently verified by the subgroup analyses of low risk of bias studies (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.98; P = 0.02) and catecholamine-resistant refractory shock patients group (RR, 0.84; 95% CI = 0.70–1.00; P = 0.048). The pooled analysis of non-catecholamine vasopressors showed a 14% higher success rate of shock reversal at 6 h, a 29% decreased risk of continuous renal replacement therapy, but a 51% increased risk of hyponatremia and a 2.43 times higher risk of digital ischemia. Besides, the pooled data showed that non-catecholamine vasopressors decreased heart rate (HR) (SMD, − 0.43; 95% CI − 0.66 – − 0.19; P < 0.001), serum creatinine (− 0.15; 95% CI − 0.29 – − 0.01; P = 0.04), and the length of mechanical ventilation (MV) (− 0.19; 95% CI − 0.31 – − 0.07; P < 0.01, but there was no significant difference in other parameters. Conclusions Current pooled results suggest that the addition of NE to non-catecholamine vasopressors was associated with a marginally significant reduction in 28-day mortality. Moreover, they were able to shorten the length of MV, improved renal function, decreased HR, and increased the 6-h shock reversal success rate at the expense of increased the risk of hyponatremia and digital ischemia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document