scholarly journals Endoscopic biliary self-expandable metallic stent in malignant biliary obstruction with or without sphincterotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. E26-E35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedetto Mangiavillano ◽  
Amedeo Montale ◽  
Leonardo Frazzoni ◽  
Mario Bianchetti ◽  
Amrita Sethi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stent Insertion ◽  
Metallic Stent ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Expandable Metallic Stent ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background and aim To assess the rate of adverse events and the technical success rate of biliary stenting with or without EBS.  Methods A literature search up to February 2017 was performed. Studies assessing adverse events (AEs) and technical success rates of stenting with or without EBS were considered. Results Seven studies (870 patients; 12 treatment arms) were included. Early AEs, i. e. those occurring within 30 days, were significantly lower in no-EBS vs. EBS-group (11 % vs. 20.1 %; OR: 0.36, 95 %CI: 0.13 – 1.00). Rates of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis were not significantly different in the two groups (no-EBS vs. EBS: 6.1 % vs 5 %; OR: 1.33, 95 %CI: 0.68 – 2.59). The rate of bleeding was significantly lower in patients without EBS (no-EBS vs EBS: 0 % vs 5 %; OR: 0.12, 95 % CI: 0.03 – 0.45). Rates of cholangitis were significantly lower in patients without EBS (no-EBS vs. EBS: 3.3 % vs. 7.4 %; OR: 0.38, 95 %CI: 0.17 – 0.83). Both late AEs and mortality rates did not significantly differ between no-EBS and EBS patients (19.9 % vs. 18.9 %; OR: 0.93, 95 %CI: 0.56 – 1.53, and 2.5 % vs. 2.9 %; OR: 1.18, 95 %CI: 0.22 – 6.29, respectively). The technical success rate for stent insertion also did not differ (98 % vs. 97.6 %; OR: 1.05, 95 %CI: 0.42 – 2.63). Conclusion EBS seems to be associated, in the first 30 days after the procedure, with an increased risk of cholangitis and bleeding. No difference was observed in the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Feasibility and Effectiveness of Placement of Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metallic Stents via Various Insertion Routes for Benign Biliary Strictures

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2397
Author(s):  
Ko Tomishima ◽  
Shigeto Ishii ◽  
Toshio Fujisawa ◽  
Muneo Ikemura ◽  
Mako Ushio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Stent Migration ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Stent Fracture ◽  
Metallic Stent ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Expandable Metallic Stent ◽  
Benign Biliary Strictures

Background and aims: The goals of the management of benign biliary stricture (BBS) are to relieve symptoms and resolve short-/long-term stricture. We performed fully covered self-expandable metallic stent (hereafter, FCSEMS) placement for BBS using various methods and investigated the treatment outcomes and adverse events (AEs). Methods: We retrospectively studied patients who underwent FCSEMS placement for refractory BBS through various approaches between January 2017 and February 2020. FCSEMS were placed for 6 months, and an additional FCSEMS was placed if the stricture had not improved. Technical success rate, stricture resolution rate, and AE were measured. Results: A total of 26 patients with BBSs that were difficult to manage with plastic stents were included. The mean overall follow-up period was 43.3 ± 30.7 months. The cause of stricture was postoperative (46%), inflammatory (31%), and chronic pancreatitis (23%). There were four insertion methods: endoscopic with duodenoscopy, with enteroscopy, EUS-guided transmural, and percutaneous transhepatic. The technical success rate was 100%, without any AE. Stricture resolution was obtained in 19 (83%) of 23 cases, except for three cases of death due to other causes. Stent migration and cholangitis occurred in 23% and 6.3%, respectively. Stent fracture occurred in two cases in which FCSEMSs were placed for more than 6 months (7.2 and 10.3 months). Conclusion: FCSEMS placement for refractory BBS via various insertion routes was feasible and effective. FCSEMSs should be exchanged every 6 months until stricture resolution because of stent durability. Further prospective study for confirmation is required, particularly regarding EUS-guided FCSEMS placement.

scholarly journals Percutaneous transhepatic drainage is safe and effective in biliary obstruction—A single-center experience of 599 patients

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0260223
Author(s):  
Bálint Kokas ◽  
Attila Szijártó ◽  
Nelli Farkas ◽  
Miklós Ujváry ◽  
Szabolcs Móri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Extrahepatic Bile Duct ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Tertiary Referral Center ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Percutaneous Transhepatic Drainage ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Transhepatic Drainage

Background Historically, surgical bilioenteric bypass was the only treatment option for extrahepatic bile duct obstruction, but with technological advancements, percutaneous transhepatic drainage (PTD) and endoscopic solutions were introduced as a less invasive alternative. Endoscopic methods may lead to a decreasing indication of PTD in the future, but today it is still the standard treatment method, especially in hilar obstructions. Methods In our retrospective data analysis, we assessed technical success rate, reintervention rate, morbidity, mortality, and the learning curve of patients treated with PTD over 12 years in a tertiary referral center. Results 599 patients were treated with 615 percutaneous interventions. 94.5% (566/599) technical success rate; 2.7% (16/599) reintervention rate were achieved. 111 minor and 22 major complications occurred including 1 case of death. In perihilar obstruction, cholangitis were significantly more frequent in cases where endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography had also been performed prior to PTD compared to PTD alone, with 39 (18.2%) and 15 (10.5%) occurrences, respectively. Discussion The results and especially the excellent success rates demonstrate that PTD is safe and effective, and it is appropriate for first choice in the treatment algorithm of perihilar stenosis. Ultimately, we concluded that PTD should be performed in experienced centers to achieve low mortality, morbidity, and high success rates.

Abstract 16680: Endovascular Therapy of Svc Syndrome-a Systematic Review

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Hussain Azizi ◽  
Irfan Shafi ◽  
Matthew Zhao ◽  
Vladimir Lakhter ◽  
Riyaz Bashir
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Restenosis Rate ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Svc Syndrome

Background: Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is caused by the occlusion of the SVC and can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Recently, endovascular therapy (ET) has become the standard of care for majority of these patients. We performed a systematic review of available literature to assess the contemporary technical success rate, restenosis rate, and recurrence rate of SVC syndrome following endovascular intervention. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from 1988 to 2019 for studies on Endovascular Therapy for SVC syndrome. After screening 709 records, 13 studies were included. Screening was conducted using Rayyan QCRI software for systemic reviews. Studies included full-length journal articles on SVC syndrome and ET among adults (18+ years). Case reports, or case series with <20 patients were excluded. Data analysis was performed using OpenMeta software. Proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random effects models. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Q and I 2 statistics. We evaluated the end-points of the technical success, restenosis rate and recurrence rates in SVC syndrome patients after endovascular stenting Results: A meta-analysis of 13 studies included a total of 1024 patients. The results of our meta-analysis show a weighted technical success rate of 98.6% (95% CI 0.97 – 0.99) (Fig. 1A), restenosis rate of 11.8% (95 CI 0.08-0.14) (Fig 1B) and recurrence rate of 9.9% (95% CI 0.06-0.13) (Fig 1C). Our studies had a substantial heterogeneity (I 2 ) of 52-80%. Figures:Figure 1A Figure 1B Figure 1C Conclusions: Our systematic review revealed high technical success rate, low restenosis, and recurrence rates after endovascular therapy supporting the paradigm of endovascular therapy as first line treatment for patients with SVC syndrome. Disclosures: Dr. Bashir has equity interest in Thrombolex Inc.

scholarly journals Endoscopic Self-Expandable Metallic Stent Insertion without Fluoroscopic Guidance Is Feasible and Safe for Acute Colonic Obstruction Caused by Colorectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Yadong Feng ◽  
Qian Yu ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
Wei Xu ◽  
Ye Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Colonic Obstruction ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Metallic Stent ◽  
Fluoroscopic Guidance ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Expandable Metallic Stent

Aims. Endoscopic self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) insertion for acute colonic obstruction caused by colorectal cancer (CRC) is always performed under fluoroscopic guidance. This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of an endoscopic stenting procedure without fluoroscopic guidance. Methods. A total of 36 patients with an acute colonic obstruction caused by CRC underwent endoscopic SEMS insertion using a colonoscope without fluoroscopic guidance, followed by analyses of the technical and clinical success and short-term complications. Results. Total technical success rate and clinical success rate were 91.7% and 86.1%, respectively. The mean procedure time was 21.2±10.3 minutes. There was no stent dislodgement. One case of hematochezia and two cases of tenesmus occurred in patients with left-sided complete obstructions. No other short-term complications occurred. Procedure time, technical success, and clinical success rate were 16.3±9.4 minutes, 93.1%, and 89.6% for left-sided obstructions, respectively, and were 26.8±10.7 minutes, 85.7%, and 71.4% for right-sided obstructions, respectively. For complete obstructions, procedure time, technical success, and clinical success rate were 22.5±8.9 minutes, 90%, and 83.3%, respectively. In the incomplete cases, procedure time, technical success, and clinical success were 13.5±6.7 minutes, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Technical success, clinical success, and short-term complications were not differed between lesion locations and degrees. Conclusions. This simple technique is feasible and safe for palliation of acute colonic obstruction caused by CRC.

scholarly journals Clinical evaluation of physician-controlled guidewire manipulation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (with video)

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. E395-E400
Author(s):  
Kyohei Nishiguchi ◽  
Takeshi Ogura ◽  
Nobu Nishioka ◽  
Saori Ueno ◽  
Atsushi Okuda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Intrahepatic Bile Duct ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Tract Dilation

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) may be most complex because of the EUS-guided biliary drainage procedure and variations in the course of the intrahepatic bile duct compared with the common bile duct (CBD). Appropriate guidewire insertion is essential. Physician-controlled guidewire manipulation (PCGW) might improve technical success rates of bile duct cannulation. The present study aimed to determine the technical feasibility and safety of PCGW during EUS-HGS. Patients and methods A total of 122 consecutive patients who were scheduled to undergo EUS-HGS between October 2017 and April 2019 were prospectively registered. The primary endpoint was the technical success rate of guidewire insertion into the CBD or hepatic hilum. Guidewire insertion was considered to have failed if the HGS assistant failed to achieve manipulation. Results The intrahepatic bile duct was successfully punctured in 120 of 122 patients. During guidewire insertion by the HGS assistant, guidewire fracture was observed in one patient. The guidewire was successfully inserted into the biliary tract and manipulated by the HGS assistant in 96 patients. PCGW was thus attempted for the remaining 23 patients. The guidewire was inserted by PCGW in all 23 patients, improving the technical success rate for guidewire insertion from 80 % to 100 %. After tract dilation, we deployed covered metal stents and plastic stents in 117 and two patients, respectively. The overall technical success rate for EUS-HGS was 97.5 % (119/122). Adverse events comprising bile peritonitis or leakage developed in five patients. Conclusion PCGW might contribute to improving the success rate of EUS-HGS.

scholarly journals Safety, Efficacy, and Outcomes of N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Glue Injection through the Endoscopic or Radiologic Route for Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2298
Author(s):  
Olivier Chevallier ◽  
Kévin Guillen ◽  
Pierre-Olivier Comby ◽  
Thomas Mouillot ◽  
Nicolas Falvo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Cyanoacrylate Glue ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
Number Of Patients

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to assess the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) injection for the treatment of variceal gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). The MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases were searched for English-language studies published from January 1980 to December 2019 and including patients who had injection of NBCA for variceal GIB. Two independent reviewers extracted and evaluated the data from eligible studies. Exclusion criteria were sample size <5, article reporting the use of NBCA with other embolic agents, no extractable data, and duplicate reports. NBCA was injected during endoscopy in 42 studies and through a direct percutaneous approach for stomal varices in 1 study. The study’s endpoints were: Technical success, 30-day rebleeding, and 30-day overall and major complications. The estimated overall rates were computed with 95% confidence intervals, based on each study rate, weighted by the number of patients involved in each study. In total, 43 studies with 3484 patients were included. The technical success rate was 94.1% (95% CI: 91.6–96.1%), the 30-day rebleeding rate was 24.2% (18.9–29.9%), and 30-day overall and major complications occurred in 15.9% (11.2–21.3%) and 5.3% (3.3–7.8%) of patients, respectively. For treating variceal GIB, NBCA injection is a safe and effective method that demonstrates high technical success rate and very low major complication rate.

Is percutaneous access superior to cutdown access for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? A meta-analysis

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110327
Author(s):  
Guoshan Bi ◽  
Quanwen Wang ◽  
Guozuo Xiong ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Dongyang Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Percutaneous Access ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Objective The objective is to investigate whether percutaneous access (pEVAR) is superior to cutdown access (cEVAR) in terms of safety and efficacy during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from January 1999 to December 2020 for studies reporting on the comparison between percutaneous and cutdown techniques for endovascular repair of AAAs. Outcomes evaluated were technical success rates, access site-related complications and operative time, and hospital stay. Results Four randomized controlled trials and nine observational studies with a total of 1683 patients comprising 2715 groin accesses were eligible for the meta-analysis. pEVAR was associated with a lower risk of overall complications (odds ratio (OR) = 0.63; p = .005) and seroma/lymphorrhea (OR, 0.18; p = .0001) and shortened operation time (MD = −39.04; p = .002) and the length of hospital stay (MD = −0.75; p < .00001) compared with cEVAR. The technical success rate for pEVAR was 95.1% (694/729), with an overall OR of 0.27 (95% CI 0.14–0.55, p = .0003) comparing pEVAR with cEVAR. Furthermore, pEVAR did not increase the risk of site infection, femoral artery thrombosis, postoperative hematoma, nerve injury, dissection, and bleeding. Conclusion Percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair is a safe and effective method for the treatment of AAA. It reduces the risk of overall complications and shortens the operation time and hospital stay. The technical success rate of pEVAR is lower than that of cEVAR, which may be linked to the selection of patients, operator experience, and the use of ultrasound. Large definitive trials are required to draw robust conclusions.

scholarly journals Outcomes of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy as primary drainage for distal biliary obstruction with covered self-expandable metallic stents

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (07) ◽  
pp. E861-E868
Author(s):  
Naosuke Kuraoka ◽  
Kazuo Hara ◽  
Nozomi Okuno ◽  
Takamichi Kuwahara ◽  
Nobumasa Mizuno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Biliary Duct ◽  
Metallic Stent ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Stent Patency ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Drainage Technique

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) is an alternative therapy for percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Outcomes of EUS-CDS for distal biliary tract obstruction with a covered self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) as a primary drainage technique are unclear because there are few relevant reports. This study aimed to determine outcomes in patients undergoing EUS-CDS using SEMS as the primary drainage technique for malignant distal biliary duct obstruction. Patients and methods This retrospective study was conducted at Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, from January 2010 to July 2018, using data from our database. Results EUS-CDS was performed as a primary drainage technique for 92 patients. The technical success rate was 92.8 %, and the clinical success rate was 91.6 %. The overall incidence of adverse events was 15.7 %. The median stent patency time for the EUS-CDS was 396 days. Nineteen patients required re-intervention because of cholangitis or jaundice. Conclusion EUS-CDS as a primary drainage technique using SEMS has high technical and clinical success rates. It should be considered an effective drainage method with respect to long-term stent patency, low re-intervention rates, and absence of severe complications.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Effects of TIPS versus BRTO on Bleeding Gastric Varices: A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zi Wen Wang ◽  
Jin Chao Liu ◽  
Fang Zhao ◽  
Wen Guang Zhang ◽  
Xu Hua Duan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatic Encephalopathy ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Gastric Varices ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Rebleeding Rate

Background and Aim. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a threat to patients with gastric varices (GVs). Previous studies have concluded that both transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) are effective treatments for patients with GV. We aimed to compare the efficiency and outcomes of these two procedures in GV patients through meta-analysis. Methods. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched using the keywords: GV, bleeding, TIPS, and BRTO to identify relevant randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. The overall survival (OS) rate, imminent haemostasis rate, rebleeding rate, technical success rate, procedure complication rate (hepatic encephalopathy and aggravated ascites), and Child-Pugh score were evaluated. Randomized clinical trials and cohort studies comparing TIPS and BRTO for GV due to portal hypertension were included in our meta-analysis. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and assessed the study quality. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs), and 95% CIs using random effects models. Results. A total of nine studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There was a significant difference between TIPS and BRTO in the OS rate (RR, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.98); P=0.03) and rebleeding rate (RR, 2.61 (95% CI, 1.75 to 3.90); P<0.00001). TIPS had a higher incidence rate of hepatic encephalopathy (RR, 16.11 (95% CI, 7.13 to 36.37); P<0.00001). There was no significant difference between TIPS and BRTO in the immediate haemostasis rate (RR, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.10); P=0.84), technical success rate (RR, 1.06 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.16); P=0.16), aggravated ascites rate (RR, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.33 to 1.09); P=0.10), or Child-Pugh change (MD, 0.22 (95% CI, −0.21 to 0.65); P=0.31). Conclusions. In this meta-analysis, BRTO brought more benefits to patients, with a higher OS rate and lower rebleeding rate. BRTO is a feasible method for GVB.

Safety and Efficacy of Totally Percutaneous Access Compared With Open Femoral Exposure for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 246-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhanjiang Cao ◽  
Weiwei Wu ◽  
Keqiang Zhao ◽  
Junlai Zhao ◽  
Yu Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Percutaneous Access ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of percutaneous (PEVAR) vs open femoral access (OFA) techniques for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: A systematic review of English-language articles (Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases) between January 1999 and August 2016 returned 11 studies including 1650 patients with 2500 groin accesses eligible for the meta-analysis. Data extracted from each study were synthesized to evaluate technical success rates, procedure time, and complications for the 2 access approaches. Data are presented as the odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The quality of individual studies was evaluated based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: The mean technical success rate in the PEVAR group was 94.5% (785/831). The overall OR was 0.38 (95% CI 0.12 to 1.18, p=0.09), indicating no significant difference between the methods. The procedure time in PEVAR was shorter than OFA (mean difference −24.52, 95% CI −46.45 to −22.60, p<0.001). Overall, the total complication rate was 15.3% in the OFA group vs 7.8% in the PEVAR group (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.73, p<0.001). The meta-analysis identified significant differences between groups for all complications (p<0.001) and the following individual adverse events: wound infection (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.81, p=0.02), pseudoaneurysm (OR 8.07, 95% CI 1.54 to 42.32, p=0.01), seroma (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.55, p=0.008), and lymphocele or lymph leak (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.92, p=0.04). Conclusion: PEVAR had a similar technical success rate, shorter procedure time, and lower complication rate compared with OFA. Thus, percutaneous access appears to be the preferential approach for EVAR. However, larger and randomized studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document