scholarly journals The Impact of Javanica Oil Emulsion Injection on Chemotherapy Efficacy and Cellular Immune Indicators in Patients with Advanced NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Huilin Xu ◽  
Zhucheng Yin ◽  
Anbing He ◽  
Dedong Cao

Background. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Javanica oil emulsion injection (JOI) combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods. Electronic databases including EMBASE, PUBMED, the Cochrane library, and Chinese Biological Medical disc (CBM) were searched until May 2018. The clinical trials reporting efficacy and immune function of JOI combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Stata 11 and RevMan 5.3 were used for meta-analysis. Results. Twenty-four studies involving 2089 cases were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that there were significant differences in objective response rate (risk ratio (RR) = 1.17; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05–1.29; P<0.05), improvement in Karnofsky Performance Status (standard mean difference (SMD) = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.41–1.77; P<0.01), incidence of adverse events (RR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.7–0.87; P<0.05), percentage changes of CD3+ cells (SMD = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.49–2.50; P<0.01), CD4+ cells (SMD = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.2–1.9; P<0.01), natural killer cells (SMD = 1.98; 95% CI: 1.15–2.82; P<0.01), but not CD8+ (SMD = −1.44; 95% CI: −4.53–1.65; P=0.36), and value of CD4+/CD8+ (SMD = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.28–0.36; P<0.01) between the JOI combination group and control group. Funnel plot and Begg’s and Egger’s analysis indicated that there was no significant publication bias (P>0.05). Conclusions. JOI may be effective to improve the efficacy of chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients, accompanied with better levels of immune cells.

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (04) ◽  
pp. 342-347
Author(s):  
Binbin Wu ◽  
Hongyan Yuan ◽  
Deyu Geng ◽  
Liang Zhang ◽  
Cheng Zhang

Abstract Introduction The efficacy of a stabilization exercise for the relief of neck pain remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effectiveness of a stabilization exercise on neck pain. Methods We searched Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO Information Services, and the Cochrane Library databases through May 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the impact of a stabilization exercise on neck pain. This meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model. Results Six RCTs are included in the meta-analysis. Compared with the control group of patients with neck pain, a stabilization exercise can significantly reduce pain scores at 4 to 6 weeks (mean difference [MD]: −2.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], −4.46 to −0.35; p = 0.02), Neck Disability Index [NDI] at 10 to 12 weeks (MD:− 6.75; 95% CI, −11.71 to −1.79; p = 0.008), and depression scale at 4 to 6 weeks (MD: −4.65; 95% CI, −7.00 to −2.31; p = 0.02), but it has no obvious impact on pain scores at 10 to 12 weeks (MD: −1.07; 95% CI, −3.42 to 1.28; p = 0.37) or at 6 months (MD: −1.02; 95% CI, −3.43 to 1.39; p = 0.41). Conclusions A stabilization exercise can provide some benefits to control neck pain.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Wen Ye ◽  
Yunliang Tang ◽  
Xiaoyang Dong ◽  
Gengfa Chen ◽  
Yan Yan ◽  
...  

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> Coma is the most serious disturbance of consciousness, which affects the life quality of patients and increases the burden of their family. Studies to assess the prognostic value of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in patients with coma have not led to precise, generally accepted prognostic rules. The study aims to assess the correlation between NSE and prognosis of coma and the predictive value of NSE for clinical prognosis. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WanFang Data from the establishment time of databases to December 2019. This analysis included patients with coma, regardless of how long the coma was. In total, 26 articles were retrieved and included in the review. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The meta-analysis revealed the NSE concentration of patients with coma is significantly higher than that of the control group (standard mean difference = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63–1.12, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of NSE in coma diagnosis was 0.5 (95% CI: 0.39–0.61) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.71–0.94). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The NSE concentration of patients with poor coma prognosis is significantly higher than that of the control group. The high NSE concentration is not necessarily a poor prognosis for coma, but low NSE concentration indicates a high probability of a good prognosis for coma.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5106-5106
Author(s):  
Rachel Lee Police ◽  
Peter C Trask ◽  
Ann Colosia ◽  
Robert Olivares ◽  
Shahnaz Khan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Follicular lymphoma (FL), the most frequent form of indolent NHL (iNHL), accounts for 20% to 30% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). Median survival is 8–15 years (yrs) for patients (pts) with advanced disease. Approximately 2/3 of pts relapse or become refractory to 1st line treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) for pts with RRFL is usually less than 2 yrs. This SLR examined current literature on RRFL, comparing the efficacy of treatments by meta-analysis where possible. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were systematically searched for studies on the efficacy and safety of treatments for RRFL published from 1997 to August 2, 2012. In addition, conference abstracts, reference lists of included articles, recent reviews, and the Clinicaltrials.gov database were searched for otherwise unpublished comparative studies. Main efficacy outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), complete response, partial response, duration of response, PFS, and overall survival (OS). Safety endpoints were grade 3/4 toxicities and treatment withdrawals for toxicity. Studies were selected if they reported on RRFL after ≥ 1 standard treatment in pts ineligible for stem cell transplant and if they were specific to or reported FL outcomes separately. We used the Bucher method for conducting adjusted indirect comparisons. Results 3,308 publications of potential interest were identified; 280 provided relevant data for iNHL; 29 reported on 23 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in iNHL; 10 were specific to FL and 5 included FL findings in a mixed histology population. OS and PFS were infrequently reported. Criteria for relapsed or refractory disease were often not defined, with only 8 studies providing varying definitions. The most commonly evaluated therapy in patients with FL was rituximab (R) either alone or with bortezomib (B) or lenalidomide (L). ORR, reported in 5 studies, ranged from 49% to 93%. Median PFS in 5 studies ranged from 10 to 25 months but was >50 months for R-CHOP followed by R maintenance. Median OS was not reported, but OS at 1-, 2-, or 3-yrs was reported in several studies. Efficacy results are shown in Table 1. Grade 3/4 toxicities included hematological events (anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia) in 8%-77% of pts. Frequent non-hematological events (≥ 5% pts) included fatigue, diarrhea, and infection. Overlapping treatments were identified in 4 FL trials in which R was identified as a common comparator allowing indirect comparisons via meta-analysis. The ratios of ORR for R + B, R + S, and O were all clinically and significantly higher than for D (Figure 1). No other comparisons were significantly different. Conclusions This SLR found that while rituximab contributes substantially to the efficacy of treatment in pts with RRFL, a need for more effective treatments remains. The relatively small number of RCTs, few overlapping treatment arms, and variability in endpoints studied make it difficult to formally compare available therapies or treatments under developments for RRFL. Significant variability in RCT features (infrequent reporting of OS/PFS, limited information on prior treatments/responses or definition of relapse/refractory) are further challenges to meaningful comparisons. Additional well designed RCTs are needed to fully understand the impact of more recently developed therapies. This research was supported by funding from Sanofi. Disclosures: Police: RTI Health Solutions: Employment. Trask:Sanofi: Employment. Colosia:RTI Health Solutions: Employment. Olivares:Sanofi: Employment. Khan:RTI Health Solutions: Employment. Abbe:Sanofi: Employment. Njue:RTI Health Solutions: Employment. Wang:RTI Health Solutions: Employment. Kaye:RTI Health Solutions: Employment. Ruiz-Soto:Sanofi: Employment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marzieh Hasanpour ◽  
Mohammad Mehdi Mohammadi ◽  
Habib Shareinia

Abstract Background Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) refers to a set of somatic and psychological symptoms that occur cyclically in the luteal phase of a menstrual cycle. There is no report of final result of reflexology on PMS. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the effect of reflexology on PMS through a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Method The present study was a systematic review and meta-analysis that was conducted by searching in 8 electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ProQuest, Scopus, Google Scholar, and SID until December 28, 2018. In this regard, interventional studies, which examined the impact of reflexology on women with premenstrual syndrome, were included. These studies were published during 1993 to 2018. The Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the quality of studies. Meta-analysis was performed by the help of CMA 2 software. Results Nine out of 407 studies finally remained after screening, and quantitative and quantitative analyses were performed on them. The total number of research samples was 475. The mean treatment time with reflexology was 40.55 min per session that was performed in 6 to 10 sessions of treatment in 66.67% of studies. According to the meta-analysis and based on the random effects model, the reflexology could decrease the severity of PMS in the intervention group compared to the control group (SMD = − 2.717, 95% CI: − 3.722 to − 1.712). Meta-regression results indicated that the duration of intervention sessions (β = − 0.1124, 95% CI − 0.142 to − 0.084, p < 0.001) had a significant impact on the severity of PMS. Reflexology could also significantly affect somatic (SMD = − 1.142, 95% CI: − 1.481 to − 0.803) and psychological (SMD = − 1.380, 95% CI: − 2.082 to − 0.677) symptoms arising from PMS. Conclusion In general, results of the present study indicated that the reflexology could relieve PMS symptoms, so that overall scores, somatic and psychological symptoms of PMS decreased by applying the reflexology intervention. Furthermore, an increase in the length of reflexology time in each session increased its efficiency. Reflexology can be used as an effective intervention in a patient care program by nurses and its efficiency can be enhanced by increasing intervention time in each reflexology treatment session.


Open Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-191
Author(s):  
Yuankai Lv ◽  
Zhuo Cao ◽  
Jiongwei Pan ◽  
Enhui Gong ◽  
Hao Zheng ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The aim of the present work was to investigate the clinical efficacy of first-line chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through a comprehensive network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods The prospective randomized controlled clinical trials relevant to 10 first-line chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of advanced NSCLC were systematic electronic search in the databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and CNKI. The combined direct or indirect objective response rate (ORR) between each of the 10 first-line chemotherapy regimens was calculated. Results Seventeen prospective clinical trials of first-line chemotherapy regimens in treatment of advanced NSCLC were included in the NMA. The 10 treatment regimens including A = cisplatin + gemcitabine, B = carboplatin + gemcitabine, C = gemcitabine, D = carboplatin + paclitaxel, E = paclitaxel + gemcitabine, F = docetaxel + carboplatin, G = gemcitabine + vinorelbine, H = pemetrexed + carboplatin, I = cisplatin + pemetrexed and J = cisplatin + docetaxel were compared in the present NMA. Direct pooled results indicated that the ORR was not statistically different (P all > 0.05). However, NMA showed that the combined ORR for regimens A (OR = 1.47, 95% CI: 0.80–2.81), B (OR = 3.22, 95% CI: 1.45–6.923), D (OR = 3.30, 95% CI: 1.22–9.33), E (OR = 4.36, 95% CI: 1.64–12.82), G (OR = 3.72, 95% CI: 1.12–12.83) and I (OR = 5.80, 95% CI: 2.04–17.86) was superior to regimen C. Rank probability analysis indicated that regimen C = gemcitabine and regimen I = cisplatin + pemetrexed had the highest probability of inferior and superior treatment ORR among the 10 first-line chemotherapy regimens. Conclusion Cisplatin + pemetrexed may have particularly prominent ORR for advanced NSCLC as the first-line chemotherapy regimen.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Dale

Abstract Introduction Postoperative pain is a significant problem that can lead to a range of complications including inadequate healing. Music has been shown to reduce postoperative pain across a range of surgical disciplines. This poster is novel as intra-operative awareness is an area of some debate and there has not previously been a systematic review of the impact of intraoperative music on the post-operative pain of abdominal surgery patients. Method A systematic review of Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Scopus identified randomised controlled trials comparing an intraoperative music intervention with standard care with postoperative pain as a measured outcome. To assess the quality of the studies and determine inclusion in meta-analysis the author collaborated with Robot Reviewer software based on the Cochrane bias methodology. Meta-analysis used standard mean difference and a random-effects model. Results The review found the majority of studies looking at intraoperative interventions determined that there was no significant impact on postoperative pain. However meta-analysis of the 250 subjects included determined that there is a significant reduction in pain (p = 0.02). The studies included also looked at opiod use, however this was not reported. Conclusions Whilst the meta-analysis is promising, findings support further investigation into intraoperative music as a low-cost addition to postoperative pain management.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinqiu Zhao ◽  
Wenxiang Huang ◽  
Shujun Zhang ◽  
Jing Xu ◽  
Wei Xue ◽  
...  

Introduction The impact of glutathione on pulmonary function remains elusive for patients with cystic fibrosis. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to explore the influence of glutathione versus placebo on pulmonary function of cystic fibrosis. Methods We search PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through May 2019, and randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the effect of glutathione on pulmonary function of cystic fibrosis are included in this meta-analysis. Results Four RCTs are included. Compared with control group in patients with cystic fibrosis, glutathione treatment shows positive impact on forced expiratory volume 1 second (FEV1) (mean difference [MD] = 0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.10–0.28; P < .0001) and body mass index (MD = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.02–0.51; P = .03), but has no obvious influence on 6-minute walk test (standard MD = 0.28; 95% CI, −0.08 to 0.64; P = .13), number of exacerbations (MD = −0.10; 95% CI, −0.34 to 0.15; P = .43), abdominal pain or distal intestinal obstruction (risk ratios [RR] = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.32–1.90; P = .58), or hemoptysis (RR = 1.87; 95% CI, 0.43–8.26; P = .41). Conclusions Glutathione treatment provides some benefits to improve pulmonary function of patients with cystic fibrosis, as evidenced by the increase in FEV1.


2021 ◽  
Vol 82 (02) ◽  
pp. 161-165
Author(s):  
Ming Deng ◽  
Hui Huang ◽  
Yong-gang Ma ◽  
Yan Zhou ◽  
Qing Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Intradiskal injection of methylene blue has some potential in alleviating discogenic back pain. This meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of intradiskal injection of methylene blue for discogenic back pain. Methods Several databases such as PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases have been searched through November 2019, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of intradiskal injection of methylene blue for discogenic back pain are included. Results Three RCTs are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for discogenic back pain, intradiskal injection of methylene blue remarkably decreased pain scores at 3 months (mean difference [MD] = –0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] = –0.96 to –0.46; p < 0.00001) and 6 months (MD = –13.92; 95% CI = –22.31 to –5.54; p = 001) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 4 to 6 weeks (MD = –10.39; 95% CI = –16.95 to –3.83; p = 0.002) and 3 months (MD = –3.66; 95% CI = –4.85 to –2.48; p < 0.00001), but demonstrated no obvious effect on ODI at 6 months (MD = –11.76; 95% CI = –33.33 to 9.80; p = 0.28). Conclusions Intradiskal injection of methylene blue can substantially decrease pain scores and improve function for discogenic back pain.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Rui Yang ◽  
You-Yang Shi ◽  
Xiang-Hui Han ◽  
Sheng Liu

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), the most common type of breast cancer, is associated with poor patient prognosis. Platinum-containing chemotherapies are commonly used in the treatment and prevention of advanced TNBC. <b><i>Objectives and Methods:</i></b> To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of platinum-containing chemotherapies in patients with advanced TNBC, we searched several databases, including PubMed, Medline, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, and the Chinese Cochrane Center, to collect published randomized controlled clinical studies of platinum-containing chemotherapies for advanced TNBC before November 2020. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.3. To assess effectiveness and safety, dichotomous and continuous variables were assessed using odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD), respectively, with 95% CI. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 1,222 patients with advanced TNBC were enrolled in 11 eligible trials, including 489 patients in the treatment group (platinum-containing) and 447 patients in the control group (non-platinum-containing). We also retrieved information whether a PARP inhibitor was combined with platinum-containing chemotherapy for patients with metastatic TNBC and identified 224 patients who received a PARP inhibitor combined with platinum-containing chemotherapy and 62 patients in the platinum-containing group who did not. The platinum-containing chemotherapy group had a significantly better objective response rate (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.20–1.71, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and longer progression-free survival (PFS; MD 1.15, 95% CI 0.03–2.28, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05) than the non-platinum-containing chemotherapy group. However, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced TNBC between the two groups (MD 2.04, 95% CI –0.83 to 4.91, <i>p</i> &#x3e; 0.05). Related adverse effects of platinum-containing chemotherapies involved gastrointestinal reaction, myelosuppression and liver function damage. Platinum-containing chemotherapies were not associated with an increased incidence of adverse side effects compared with non-platinum-containing chemotherapies, with the exception of nausea and vomiting (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.10–4.46, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). Furthermore, the addition of the PARP inhibitor iniparib to gemcitabine and carboplatin treatment improved the rate of clinical benefit, OS and PFS. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Platinum-containing chemotherapy remains a highly recommended therapeutic regimen due to greater effectiveness and tolerance for patients with advanced TNBC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gozali Sembiring ◽  
Yacobda Sigumonrong

Abstract Background Bleeding, hematoma, edema, wound infection, and scar formation are the common problems linked with hypospadias reconstruction. Hormone treatment is recommended before surgical treatment to improve intraoperative circumstances. However, no meta-analysis has explored the effectiveness and side effects of testosterone treatment before surgery in hypospadias. Main body of the abstract The purpose of this paperwork is to evaluate the impact of preoperative testosterone treatment in hypospadias based on clinical data from published trials. This study searched MEDLINE, Science Direct, and the Cochrane Library without regard to year. However, only English journals were included, with a manual search using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Guidelines supplementing the search. In this meta-analysis, five papers were considered. Two of these investigations were multicenter randomized clinical trials. Two of the studies were prospective, with a median follow-up of varying lengths. A retrospective investigation was conducted. There were 585 patients in all that took part in this trial. After surgery, the complication rate was measured in both the intervention and control groups, including meatal stenosis, fistula, glans dehiscence, scarring, reoperation rate, urethral diverticulum, fine pubic hair, and sexual precocity. The only significant difference between the intervention and control groups was that the intervention group had a decreased frequency of glans dehiscence following surgery (OR 0.40 with the 95% CI of 0.17 until 0.97). Conclusions This study discovered that a patient who got testosterone before surgery had a considerably decreased complication risk for glandular dehiscence. Reoperation rate, urethral-cutaneous fistula, meatal stenosis, and penile scarring in children with hypospadias, on the other hand, revealed no significant difference in the testosterone-treated group against the control group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document