scholarly journals Corrigendum to “Five-Year Incidence and Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients with Type II Diabetes in a Tertiary Care Center in Lebanon”

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Carl-Joe Mehanna ◽  
Maamoun Abdul Fattah ◽  
Hani Tamim ◽  
Mona P. Nasrallah ◽  
Raya Zreik ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (232) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lochan Karki ◽  
Krishna Rana ◽  
Manisha Shahi ◽  
Anjila Pradhan ◽  
Roshina Thapa ◽  
...  

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disease that is mainly associated with a number of lifestyle behaviors. There is a high discrepancy among urban and rural populations with the prevalence of diabetes in rural areas as 2.5% and a high prevalence of 14.6% in urban areas. Type 2 diabetes mellitus accounts for the majority of all diabetes cases with a number of chronic effects that include cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, blindness, and disability. This study is done to determine the prevalence of Type II Diabetes Mellitus among the adult population in the medical department of a tertiary care center. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was done in a medical department of a tertiary care center of Himal Hospital Private Limited from March to April 2020. Ethical approval was taken from the Ethical Review Board of NHRC (Reference Number 752). All the data of the last two years from the medical record section were included in the study. The convenience sampling technique was followed. Descriptive statistical analysis was done. Results: The study showed the prevalence of Type II Diabetes Mellitus among the adult population to be 23.93 % (0.23) (C.I= 0.20-0.26). Prevalence was found to be ... Conclusions: The prevalence of Type II Diabetes Mellitus was found to be higher than the previous study done in similar settings.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl-Joe Mehanna ◽  
Maamoun Abdul Fattah ◽  
Hani Tamim ◽  
Mona P. Nasrallah ◽  
Raya Zreik ◽  
...  

Objective. To estimate the 5-year incidence of progression rate and regression rate and risk factors for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in a cohort of Lebanese patients with type II diabetes. Methods. We followed a cohort of 462 Lebanese patients with type II diabetes for over 5 years at the American University of Beirut Medical Center. Patients underwent yearly complete ophthalmic evaluation and fundus photographs and were assessed for the incidence, stage, and evolution of DR using modified Airlie House classification. Results. Among the 462 patients, 281 had no DR at baseline. The 5-year cumulative incidence of any DR was 10% (95% CI: 6–13), and only baseline microalbuminuria correlated with the development of DR (OR=10.53, 95% CI: 4.39–25.23, p<0.0001). Among the 181 patients with baseline DR, the worsening and regression rates of DR were 31.5% (95% CI: 25–38) and 9% (95% CI: 5–13), respectively. Microalbuminuria also approached statistical significance as a risk factor for DR worsening (OR=1.89, 95% CI: 0.97–3.70, p=0.06). Conclusion. The 5-year incidence of DR in this hospital-based cohort is relatively low. Microalbuminuria was independently associated with the incidence and progression of the disease. We recommend to screen patients with type II diabetes for microalbuminuria as prognostic for the development and worsening of DR.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khaled Ahmed Baagar ◽  
Fahmi Khan ◽  
Mahmoud Zirie ◽  
Sara Darwish ◽  
Ahmed K A Mohammed ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the most common microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (T2D). The reported prevalence of DR from different populations in the last decade was 13 - 38.1%. A report from our center 17 years ago showed that DR prevalence was 43.6%. With the all accumulated evidence showing that diabetes control decreases DR risk and the introduction of new drugs that helped better T2D control, we aimed to assess the current prevalence and predictors of DR among patients with T2D attending out-patient department at our tertiary care center. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 638 patients. We collected information about their baseline characteristics, confirmed DR with its severity and maculopathy diagnosis, age at T2D diagnosis, duration of T2D, and averages of HbA1C, blood pressure (BP), cholesterol, and vitamin D levels over the previous year. A statistical analysis was performed using the software SPSS 23.0. A multivariate logistic regression analysis examined the independent predictors of DR development. Results: The mean age of the patients was 55.8 ± 10.3 years, and 42.8% were males. The mean BMI was 32.4 ± 12.4 kg/m2 with 58% had obesity. The mean duration of T2D was 11.5 ± 7.7 years, and the mean age at T2D diagnosis was 44.0 ± 9.98 years. The mean HbA1C was 8.3 ± 1.6 % with 77% had average HbA1C above 7% and 51.3% had average HbA1c above 8%. The mean systolic and diastolic BP were 136.37 ± 15.01 mmHg and 74.12 ± 8.078 mmHg, respectively. DR was diagnosed in 223 cases (35%). Of the 638 patients, 24.5% had non-proliferative DR, 9.2% had proliferative DR, and 4.2% had maculopathy. There was no significant difference in DR prevalence between males (36%) and females (34.1%) (P = 0.59). Predictors of DR development were age above 40 years, duration of T2D more than 10 years, early age of T2D diagnosis, average HbA1C more than 8%, and hypertension. Discussion: T2D is a major health challenge to our community with its very high prevalence. The prevalence of DR in T2D patients attending our institution was significant (more than one-third, 35%) in comparison to reports from other centers. However, we showed an improvement in DR development in our patients from 43.6% to 35%, probably due to better T2D and BP control. Similar to previous reports, T2D patients with older age, long T2D duration, younger age at T2D diagnosis, uncontrolled diabetes, and uncontrolled BP were more likely to develop DR. Conclusion: Physicians treating T2D patients should ensure regular retina screening especially for those with risk factors for DR. Also, they should fix the modifiable risk factors of DR; diabetes and BP control. References: (1) Alaboud et al. Saudi Med J 2016; Vol. 37 (12): 1408–1411.doi: 10.15537/smj.2016.12.17062. (2) Lim MC et al. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2008 Sep;37(9):753–9. (3) Hammes H-P et al. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0132492. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0132492


2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (244) ◽  
pp. 1243-1246
Author(s):  
Prakash Kayastha ◽  
Sharma Paudel ◽  
Ghanshyam Gurung ◽  
Pradeep Kumar ◽  
Rudra Prasad Upadhyaya ◽  
...  

Introduction: Sonographic carotid intima media thickness measurement in diabetic patients is an important tool for estimating the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. It is a simple, noninvasive and widely available tool which can give idea of further treatment needed. The objective of this study was to determine the mean intima media complex thickness in patients with type II diabetes mellitus attending a tertiary care center. Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study done in 64 patients with the type II diabetes mellitus patients visiting diabetic clinic of Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, sent for carotid Doppler examination in the department of radiology and imaging. Ethical approval was taken from the Instituitonal Review Board. Convenient sampling method was used. Carotid intima media thickness was measured on both sides and mean intima media thickness was calculated. Mean intima media thickness for male and female diabetic patients was also calculated separately. Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 25 was used for data analysis. Results: The mean carotid intima media thickness was 0.86±0.13mm with range from 0.7mm to 1.3mm. Mean intima media thickness in male was 0.832±0.094mm and in female it was 0.904±0.144mm. Among 64 patients, 30 (46.8%) were female and 34 (53.3%) were male. Age of the patients ranged from 35 years to 68 years with mean age of 52.4±6.54 years. Conclusions: Carotid intima media thickness in patients with type II diabetes mellitus showed higher values than that of mean value from study done in similar study. Female had higher mean intima media thickness than male.


2021 ◽  
Vol 69 (11) ◽  
pp. 3349
Author(s):  
Sandeep Bansal ◽  
Rakesh Kaswan ◽  
Reema Bansal ◽  
Deeksha Katoch ◽  
Mohit Dogra ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document