scholarly journals Assessment of Correlation between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion Weighted MR Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging of Sacroiliitis with Ankylosing Spondylitis

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Yinghua Zhao ◽  
Qun Zhang ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
Yanqiu Feng ◽  
Yihao Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Mr Imaging ◽  
Molecular Diffusion ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Intravoxel Incoherent Motion ◽  
Maximum Enhancement ◽  
Dce Mri ◽  
Dynamic Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Diffusion Weighted ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

The relationships between IVIM and DCE-MRI parameters in AS are not clear. We explore the correlation between intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) parameters obtained on MR images in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Forty-four patients with AS were prospectively examined using a 1.5-T MR system. IVIM DWI was performed with 11 b values (range, 0–800 s/mm2) for all patients. The correlation coefficients between IVIM and DCE-MRI parameters were analyzed using Spearman’s method. Our results showed that intra- and interobserver reproducibility were excellent to relatively good (ICC = 0.804–0.981; narrow width of 95% limits of agreement). Moderate positive correlations were observed between pure molecular diffusion (Ds) and maximum enhancement (ME) and relative enhancement (RE) (r = 0.700, P<0.001; r=0.607, P < 0.001, resp.). Perfusion-related diffusion (Df) showed negative moderate correlation with ME (r = -0.608, P < 0.001). However, no correlation was observed between perfusion fraction (f) and any parameters of ME, RE, TTP, and BE (r = −0.093–0.213; P > 0.165). In conclusion, the IVIM parameters, especially f, might play a critical role in detecting the progression of AS, because it can provide more perfusion information compared with DCE-MRI; besides the IVIM MRI is a noninvasive method.

Use-fullness of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and diffusion weighted MR imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant parotid tumors

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Keyword(s):  
Mr Imaging ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Dce Mri ◽  
Dynamic Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Parotid Tumors ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Type C ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
And Diffusion ◽  
Malignant Parotid Tumors

Objectives: To evaluate the usefullness of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR Imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiating benign from malignant parotid tumors. Methods: Prospectively,DCE-MRI and DWI were performed in 112 patients, with 148 confirmed parotid masses. The differential optimal thresholds were determined. Results: WConsidering tumors with time-intensity curve (TIC) Type C as malignant, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy were 95%, 76%, 79%, respectively. Considering ADC threshold values 0.709×10-3mm2 /s<ADC<0.948×10-3mm2 /s as malignant, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy were 75%, 78%, 78%, respectively. Considering TIC Type C and ADC values 0.709×10-3mm2 /s<ADC<0.948×10-3mm2 /s as malignant, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy were 75%, 91%, 89%, respectively. With threshold Kep<1.118 min-1 and Ve >0.315 between Warthin and malignant tumors, threshold Kep>0.555 min-1 and Ve <0.605 between pleomorphic adenomas and malignant tumors, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy for malignancy were 70% vs 90%, 96% vs 74%, 92% vs 80%, respectively. Conclusion: DCE-MRI and DWI provide more information in differentiating benign from malignant parotid tumors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document