scholarly journals A Group Decision-Making Model Based on Regression Method with Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relations

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Xue ◽  
Yifei Du

In recent years, the decision-making models with hesitant fuzzy preference relations (HFPRs) have received a lot of attention by some researchers. Meanwhile, the previous studies normally adopt normalization technical means to ensure the same number for all elements, which biases original information of decision-makers. In order to overcome this problem, in this paper, the multiplicative consistency of HFPRs is defined and the highest consistent reduced HFPRs are obtained by means of fuzzy linear programming method from given HFPRs. The proposed regression method eliminates the unreasonable information and retains the reasonable information from a given HFPR. In addition, the proposed method overcomes drawbacks of Zhu and Xu’s regression method and is more simple and effective. On account of the obtained reduced HFPRs by the proposed regression method, a GDM model is established. Finally, a supplier selection problem was researched to present the effectiveness and pragmatism of the proposed approach, which proved that the method could offer beneficial insights into the GDM procedure.

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 4041-4058
Author(s):  
Fang Liu ◽  
Xu Tan ◽  
Hui Yang ◽  
Hui Zhao

Intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations (IFPRs) have the natural ability to reflect the positive, the negative and the non-determinative judgements of decision makers. A decision making model is proposed by considering the inherent property of IFPRs in this study, where the main novelty comes with the introduction of the concept of additive approximate consistency. First, the consistency definitions of IFPRs are reviewed and the underlying ideas are analyzed. Second, by considering the allocation of the non-determinacy degree of decision makers’ opinions, the novel concept of approximate consistency for IFPRs is proposed. Then the additive approximate consistency of IFPRs is defined and the properties are studied. Third, the priorities of alternatives are derived from IFPRs with additive approximate consistency by considering the effects of the permutations of alternatives and the allocation of the non-determinacy degree. The rankings of alternatives based on real, interval and intuitionistic fuzzy weights are investigated, respectively. Finally, some comparisons are reported by carrying out numerical examples to show the novelty and advantage of the proposed model. It is found that the proposed model can offer various decision schemes due to the allocation of the non-determinacy degree of IFPRs.


Mathematics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atiq-ur Rehman ◽  
Mustanser Hussain ◽  
Adeel Farooq ◽  
Muhammad Akram

In this paper, a consensus-based method for multi-person decision making (MPDM) using product transitivity with incomplete fuzzy preference relations (IFPRs) is proposed. Additionally, an average aggregation operator has been used at the first level to estimate the missing preference values and construct the complete fuzzy preference relation (FPR). Then it is confirmed to be product consistent by using the transitive closure formula. Following this, weights of decision makers (DMs) are evaluated by merging consistency weights and predefined priority weights (if any). The consistency weights for the DMs are estimated through product consistency investigation of the information provided by each DM. The consensus process determines whether the selection procedure should be initiated or not. The hybrid comprises of a quitting process and feedback mechanism, and is used to enhance the consensus level amongst DMs in case of an inadequate state. The quitting process arises when some DMs decided to leave the course, and is common in MPDM while dealing with a large number of alternatives. The feedback mechanism is the main novelty of the proposed technique which helps the DMs to improve their given preferences based on this consistency. At the end, a numerical example is deliberated to measure the efficiency and applicability of the proposed method after the comparison with some existing models under the same assumptions. The results show that proposed method can offer useful comprehension into the MPDM process.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Choonkil Park ◽  
Shahzaib Ashraf ◽  
Noor Rehman ◽  
Saleem Abdullah ◽  
Muhammad Aslam

As a generalization of Pythagorean fuzzy sets and picture fuzzy sets, spherical fuzzy sets provide decision makers more flexible space in expressing their opinions. Preference relations have received widespread acceptance as an efficient tool in representing decision makers’ preference over alternatives in the decision-making process. In this paper, some new preference relations are investigated based on the spherical fuzzy sets. Firstly, the deficiency of the existing operating laws is elaborated in detail and three cases are described to identify the accuracy of the proposed operating laws in the context of t-spherical fuzzy environment. Also, a novel score function is proposed to obtain the consistent value in ranking of the alternatives. The backbone of this research, t-spherical fuzzy preference relation, consistent t-spherical fuzzy preference relations, incomplete t-spherical fuzzy preference relations, consistent incomplete t-spherical fuzzy preference relations, and acceptable incomplete t-spherical fuzzy preference relations are established. Additionally, some ranking and selection algorithms are established using the proposed novel score function and preference relations to tackle the uncertainty in real-life decision-making problems. Finally, evaluation of the product quality of the online shopping platform problem is demonstrated to show the applicability and reliability of proposed technique.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (06) ◽  
pp. 1611-1646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Tang ◽  
Qingxian An ◽  
Fanyong Meng ◽  
Xiaohong Chen

Hesitant fuzzy preference relations (HFPRs) are efficient tools to denoting the decision maker’s judgements that permit the decision makers to compare objects using several values in [0, 1], and the number of elements in different hesitant fuzzy elements may be different. After reviewing the previous researches about decision making with HFPRs, one can find that there are several limitations. To avoid these issues and to guarantee the reasonable ranking order, this paper introduces a new additive consistency concept for HFPRs. Different from the previous consistency concepts, the new concept neither needs to add values into hesitant fuzzy elements nor disregards any information offered by the decision makers. To measure the additive consistency of HFPRs, two 0-1 mixed programming models are constructed. Meanwhile, an additive consistency based 0-1 mixed programming model is established to determining the missing values in incomplete HFPRs that can address the situation where ignored objects exist. Then, an algorithm to obtaining the hesitant fuzzy priority weight vector from (incomplete) HFPRs is provided. Considering group decision making, a new group consensus index is defined, and an interactive approach to improving the group consensus level of individual HFPRs is offered. Furthermore, a probability distance measure between two HFPRs is defined to deriving the weights of the decision makers. According to the additive consistency and consensus analysis, an approach to group decision making with incomplete and inconsistent HFPRs is performed. Finally, two practical numerical examples are provided, and comparison analysis is offered.


Author(s):  
YAN-PING JIANG ◽  
ZHI-PING FAN

In this paper, a new approach is proposed to solve group decision making (GDM) problems where the preference information on alternatives provided by decision makers (DMs) is represented in incomplete fuzzy preference relations. In order to make the collective opinion close each decision maker's opinion as near as possible, an optimization model is constructed to integrate the incomplete fuzzy preference relations and to compute the collective ranking values of alternatives. The ranking of alternatives or selection of the most desirable alternative(s) is directly obtained from the derived collective ranking values. A numerical example is also used to illustrate the applicability of the proposed approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document