scholarly journals Simplifying the Treatment of Bone Atrophy in the Posterior Regions: Combination of Zygomatic and Wide-Short Implants—A Case Report with 2 Years of Follow-Up

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Fernanda Faot ◽  
Geninho Thomé ◽  
Amália Machado Bielemann ◽  
Caio Hermann ◽  
Ana Cláudia Moreira Melo ◽  
...  

The rehabilitation of maxillary and mandibular bone atrophy represents one of the main challenges of modern oral implantology because it requires a variety of procedures, which not only differ technically, but also differ in their results. In the face of limitations such as deficiencies in the height and thickness of the alveolar structure, prosthetic rehabilitation has sought to avoid large bone reconstruction through bone grafting; this clinical behavior has become a treatment system based on evidence from clinical scientific research. In the treatment of atrophic maxilla, the use of zygomatic implants has been safely applied as a result of extreme technical rigor and mastery of this surgical skill. For cases of posterior mandibular atrophy, short implants with a large diameter and a combination of short and long implants have been recommended to improve biomechanical resistance. These surgical alternatives have demonstrated a success rate similar to that of oral rehabilitation with the placing of conventional implants, allowing the adoption of immediate loading protocol, a decrease in morbidity, simplification and speed of the treatment, and cost reduction. This case report presents complete oral rehabilitation in a patient with bilateral bone atrophy in the posterior regions of the maxilla and mandible with the goal of developing and increasing posterior occlusal stability during immediate loading.

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira ◽  
Mariana Schaffer Brackmann ◽  
Larissa Carvalho Trojan ◽  
Paulo Domingos Ribeiro Júnior ◽  
Luis Eduardo Marques Padovan

Edentulous patients with an atrophic maxilla associated with lip-palate fissures have unpredictable results after undergoing grafting procedures. In situations where the atrophic maxilla does not adequately allow reconstruction, the use of zygomatic implants has been indicated, and probably these implants can be indicated for the rehabilitation of patients with lip-palate fissures. This case report describes the oral rehabilitation treatment of a patient with a lip-palate cleft treated with zygomatic implants and implant-supported fixed prosthesis with two years of follow-up. A 65-year-old female patient had a lip-palate cleft and previously underwent surgery to close the cleft. The patient had a severely atrophic maxilla and had difficulty adapting to a removable total prosthesis. Due to the small amount of bone remaining and extensive fibrous tissue in the palate region, a rehabilitation with conventional implants associated with zygomatic implants was chosen. Two zygomatic implants and a conventional implant were placed on the right side, and a zygomatic implant and conventional implant were placed on the left side; these implants were later activated by a protocol-type prosthesis. The zygomatic implants provided an adequate aesthetic and functional outcome of the prosthesis in a patient with cleft palate.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Vaniel Fogli ◽  
Michele Camerini ◽  
Dorina Lauritano ◽  
Francesco Carinci

The implants failure may be caused by micromotion and stress exerted on implants during the phase of bone healing. This concept is especially true in case of implants placed in atrophic ridges. So the primary stabilization and fixation of implants are an important goal that can also allow immediate loading and oral rehabilitation on the same day of surgery. This goal may be achieved thanks to the technique of welding titanium bars on implant abutments. In fact, the procedure can be performed directly in the mouth eliminating possibility of errors or distortions due to impression. This paper describes a case report and the most recent data about long-term success and high predictability of intraorally welded titanium bar in immediate loading implants.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Gustavo Paleari ◽  
Cristina Dupim Presoto ◽  
Juliano Alencar Vasconcelos ◽  
José Maurício dos Santos Nunes Reis ◽  
Lígia Antunes Pereira Pinelli ◽  
...  

The oral rehabilitation of edentulous patients with immediate loading has become a safe procedure with high predictability. The success is related to immediate fabrication of a passive fit framework to attach the implants. Based on these considerations, this case report shows an alternative technique for mandibular rehabilitation using implants immediately loaded, where the framework was fabricated using cylinders with internal reinforcement and precast pieces, electrowelding, and conventional welding providing esthetics and function to the patient in a short period of time.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naushad Puthukkat ◽  
KKamalakanth Shenoy ◽  
SVidya Bhat ◽  
Sanath Shetty

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 62-67
Author(s):  
Dr Arun Vidyadharan ◽  
◽  
Dr Yasufumi Hanawa ◽  
Dr Shibu Godfrey ◽  
Dr Resmi P.G

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-110
Author(s):  
Liliane Pacheco de Carvalho ◽  
Alexandre Marcelo de Carvalho ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Francischone ◽  
Flavia Lucisano Botelho do Amaral ◽  
Bruno Salles Sotto-Maior

Background. Maxillary bone atrophy with a considerable amount of pneumatization and anterior expansion of the maxillary sinus might be a situation limiting oral rehabilitation with osseointegrated implants. Therefore, the present study aimed to biomechanically evaluate two rehabilitation techniques for maxillary bone atrophy: all-on-four and long trans-sinus implants. Methods. Two three-dimensional models consisting of atrophic maxilla with four implants were simulated. In the M1 model, two axially inserted anterior implants and two tilted implants, 15 mm in length, placed tangential to the maxillary sinus’s anterior wall were used. In the M2 model, two axially inserted anterior implants and two trans-sinus tilted implants, 24 mm in length, were used. For the finite element analysis (FEA), an axial load of 100 N was applied on the entire extension of the prosthesis, simulating a rehabilitation with immediate loading. The peri-implant bone and the infrastructure were analyzed according to the Mohr-Coulomb and Rankine criteria, respectively. Results. The results were similar when the stresses on peri-implant bone were compared: 0.139 and 0.149 for models 1 and 2, respectively. The tension values were lower in the model with trans-sinus implants (27.99 MPa). Conclusion. It was concluded that the two techniques exhibited similar biomechanical behavior, suggesting that the use of long trans-sinus implants could be a new option for atrophic maxilla rehabilitation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17
Author(s):  
Catarina Tavares ◽  
Cidália Pires

Abstract Purpose: An 81-year-old male patient, without systemic disorders, came to the appointment referring lack of masticatory function. It was planned a rehabilitation with six implants in upper atrophic maxilla (Implant Direct – Swish Plus), including immediate placing of 4 implants and 2 posterior tilted implants due to the severe pneumatization of maxillary sinus and bone ridge resorption. The prosthetic phase was initiated 4 months after implants surgery. Case report: The placement of tilted implants with the objective of the necessity of bone grafts and increase bone support has been reported by several authors as a viable rehabilitation. And since it is a minimally invasive surgery, it has good acceptance by the patient. The placement of tilted implants is a viable surgical alternative in anatomic regions such as: the anterior or posterior wall of the maxillary sinus, the palatal curvature or the pterygoid process. This treatment option, allied to the use of longer implants, allows an improved primary stability favoring immediate loading. Also, allows the adequate distribution of the implants, resulting in a more uniform distribution of forces and avoids the necessity of cantilever. Some authors have been questioning the biomechanical qualities of this surgical option; however, there are no statistical differences when compared with implants conventionally placed. ​Conclusions: Tilted implants allow an implant-supported rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla without bone grafts, which decreases the waiting period, the patient’s morbidity and the costs of the treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document