scholarly journals Big Bang Nucleosynthesis in Visible and Hidden-Mirror Sectors

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Paolo Ciarcelluti
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
Big Bang ◽  
Dark Matter Candidate ◽  
Big Bang Nucleosynthesis ◽  
Enhanced Production ◽  
The Standard Model ◽  
The Big Bang ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Mirror Matter

One of the still viable candidates for the dark matter is the so-called mirror matter. Its cosmological and astrophysical implications were widely studied, pointing out the importance to go further with research. In particular, the Big Bang nucleosynthesis provides a strong test for every dark matter candidate, since it is well studied and involves relatively few free parameters. The necessity of accurate studies of primordial nucleosynthesis with mirror matter has then emerged. I present here the results of accurate numerical simulations of the primordial production of both ordinary nuclides and nuclides made of mirror baryons, in presence of a hidden mirror sector with unbroken parity symmetry and with gravitational interactions only. These elements are the building blocks of all the structures forming in the Universe; therefore, their chemical composition is a key ingredient for astrophysics with mirror dark matter. The production of ordinary nuclides shows differences from the standard model for a ratio of the temperatures between mirror and ordinary sectorsx=T′/T≳0.3, and they present an interesting decrease of the abundance ofLi7. For the mirror nuclides, instead, one observes an enhanced production ofHe4, which becomes the dominant element forx≲0.5, and much larger abundances of heavier elements.

scholarly journals The building blocks of the universe

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anslyn J. John
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
Big Bang ◽  
The State ◽  
Dark Sector ◽  
Big Bang Nucleosynthesis ◽  
Ordinary Matter ◽  
Special Collection ◽  
The Universe

I review the state of knowledge of the composition of the universe for a non-specialist audience. The universe is built up of four components. These are radiation, baryonic (ordinary) matter, dark matter and dark energy. In this article, a quick outline of the theory of Big Bang nucleosynthesis is presented, and the origin of the elements is explained. Cosmology requires the presence of dark matter, which forms most of the mass of the universe, and dark energy, which drives the acceleration of the expansion. The dark sector is motivated, and possible explanations are stated.Contribution: As part of this special collection on building blocks, the building blocks of the universe are discussed and unsolved problems and proposed solutions are highlighted.

scholarly journals AN APPARATUS TO SEARCH FOR MIRROR DARK MATTER

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (23) ◽  
pp. 3833-3847 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. N. GNINENKO
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Decay Mode ◽  
Branching Ratio ◽  
Big Bang ◽  
Big Bang Nucleosynthesis ◽  
Order Of Magnitude ◽  
The Big Bang ◽  
Invisible Decay ◽  
Better Than ◽  
Mirror Matter

Among several interesting motivations for experimenting with orthopositronium (o-Ps) in vacuum the most exciting one is probably related to the search for the dark matter of a mirror-type. The mirror matter is predicted to exist if parity is an unbroken symmetry of the vacuum. The existence of the mirror matter, which in addition to gravity communicates with our world through photon-mirror photon mixing, would result in orthopositronium (o-Ps) to mirror orthopositronium (o-Ps') oscillations. The experimental signature of this effect is the invisible decay of o-Ps in vacuum. We discuss an experiment to search for o-Ps→invisible decay in vacuum with a sensitivity in the branching ratio Br(o-Ps→invisible)≃10-7, which is an order of magnitude better than the present limit on this decay mode from the Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. Details of the design are presented. The effect of various environments on o-Ps→o-Ps' oscillation probability is also discussed.

scholarly journals Relativistic Cosmology with an Introduction to Inflation

Universe ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 276
Author(s):  
Muhammad Zahid Mughal ◽  
Iftikhar Ahmad ◽  
Juan Luis García Guirao
Keyword(s):  
Standard Model ◽  
Early Universe ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Big Bang ◽  
Relativistic Cosmology ◽  
The Standard Model ◽  
Big Bang Model ◽  
The Big Bang ◽  
The Universe

In this review article, the study of the development of relativistic cosmology and the introduction of inflation in it as an exponentially expanding early phase of the universe is carried out. We study the properties of the standard cosmological model developed in the framework of relativistic cosmology and the geometric structure of spacetime connected coherently with it. The geometric properties of space and spacetime ingrained into the standard model of cosmology are investigated in addition. The big bang model of the beginning of the universe is based on the standard model which succumbed to failure in explaining the flatness and the large-scale homogeneity of the universe as demonstrated by observational evidence. These cosmological problems were resolved by introducing a brief acceleratedly expanding phase in the very early universe known as inflation. The cosmic inflation by setting the initial conditions of the standard big bang model resolves these problems of the theory. We discuss how the inflationary paradigm solves these problems by proposing the fast expansion period in the early universe. Further inflation and dark energy in fR modified gravity are also reviewed.

Naming the Big Bang

2012 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helge Kragh
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Community ◽  
Big Bang ◽  
Consensus Model ◽  
Initial State ◽  
The Standard Model ◽  
Modern Cosmology ◽  
Fred Hoyle ◽  
The Big Bang ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Origin Of The Universe

The standard model of modern cosmology is known as the hot big bang, a name that refers to the initial state of the universe some fourteen billion years ago. The name Big Bang introduced by Fred Hoyle in 1949 is one of the most successful scientific neologisms ever. How did the name originate and how was it received by physicists and astronomers in the period leading up to the hot big bang consensus model in the late 1960s? How did it reflect the meanings of the origin of the universe, a concept that predates the name by nearly two decades? Contrary to what is often assumed, the name was not an instant success—it took more than twenty years before Big Bang became a household word in the scientific community. When it happened, it was used with different connotations, as is still the case. Moreover, it was used earlier and more frequently in popular than in scientific contexts, and not always relating to cosmology. It turns out that Hoyle’s celebrated name has a richer and more surprising history than commonly assumed and also that the literature on modern cosmology and its history includes many common mistakes and errors. An etymological approach centering on the name Big Bang provides supplementary insight to the historical understanding of the emergence of modern cosmology.

scholarly journals Impact of neutrino properties and dark matter on the primordial Lithium production

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (08) ◽  
pp. 1950065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahani R. Makki ◽  
Mounib F. El Eid ◽  
Grant J. Mathews
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Early Universe ◽  
Nuclear Physics ◽  
Big Bang ◽  
Light Elements ◽  
Big Bang Nucleosynthesis ◽  
Chemical Potentials ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Universe

The light elements and their isotopes were produced during standard big bang nucleosynthesis (SBBN) during the first minutes after the creation of the universe. Comparing the calculated abundances of these light species with observed abundances, it appears that all species match very well except for lithium (7Li) which is overproduced by the SBBN. This discrepancy is rather challenging for several reasons to be considered on astrophysical and on nuclear physics ground, or by invoking nonstandard assumptions which are the focus of this paper. In particular, we consider a variation of the chemical potentials of the neutrinos and their temperature. In addition, we investigated the effect of dark matter on 7Li production. We argue that including nonstandard assumptions can lead to a significant reduction of the 7Li abundance compared to that of SBBN. This aspect of lithium production in the early universe may help to resolve the outstanding cosmological lithium problem.

scholarly journals Dark matter freeze-out during matter domination

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (29) ◽  
pp. 1850181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saleh Hamdan ◽  
James Unwin
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Energy Density ◽  
Big Bang ◽  
Big Bang Nucleosynthesis ◽  
Hubble Rate ◽  
Dark Matter Relic Density ◽  
Relic Density ◽  
The Masses ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Freeze Out

We highlight the general scenario of dark matter freeze-out while the energy density of the universe is dominated by a decoupled non-relativistic species. Decoupling during matter domination changes the freeze-out dynamics, since the Hubble rate is parametrically different for matter and radiation domination. Furthermore, for successful Big Bang Nucleosynthesis the state dominating the early universe energy density must decay, this dilutes (or repopulates) the dark matter. As a result, the masses and couplings required to reproduce the observed dark matter relic density can differ significantly from radiation-dominated freeze-out.

A classical non-quantum all-time time-symmetrical zero-energy single-bounce model for the creation, big bang, and death of the universe

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (14) ◽  
pp. 1944024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur E. Fischer
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Cold Dark Matter ◽  
Big Bang ◽  
Final States ◽  
Level Curve ◽  
Zero Energy ◽  
Time Model ◽  
Gravitational Effects ◽  
The Big Bang ◽  
The Universe

In this paper, we show how the [Formula: see text]CDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) Standard Model for cosmology can be extrapolated backwards through the big bang into the infinite past to yield an all-time model of the universe with scale factor given by [Formula: see text] defined and continuous for all [Formula: see text] and smooth ([Formula: see text] and satisfying Friedmann’s equation for all [Formula: see text]. At the big bang [Formula: see text], there is a nondifferentiable cusp singularity and our model shows some details of the behavior of the universe at this singularity. Our model is a zero-energy single-bounce model and an examination of the [Formula: see text]-plot of the [Formula: see text] level curve gives critical information about the initial and final states of the universe, about the evolution of the universe, and about the behavior of the universe at the big bang. Our results show that much can be said classically about the birth, big bang and death of the universe before one needs to reach for quantum gravitational effects.

scholarly journals Dark Matter in the Universe

1986 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 27-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera C. Rubin
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Deceleration Parameter ◽  
Big Bang ◽  
Theoretical Cosmology ◽  
Observational Cosmology ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Galaxy ◽  
Expansion Of The Universe ◽  
The Big Bang ◽  
The Universe

Thirty years ago, observational cosmology consisted of the search for two numbers: Ho, the rate of expansion of the universe at the position of the Galaxy; and qo, the deceleration parameter. Twenty years ago, the discovery of the relic radiation from the Big Bang produced another number, 3oK. But it is the past decade which has seen the enormous development in both observational and theoretical cosmology. The universe is known to be immeasurably richer and more varied than we had thought. There is growing acceptance of a universe in which most of the matter is not luminous. Nature has played a trick on astronomers, for we thought we were studying the universe. We now know that we were studying only the small fraction of it that is luminous. I suspect that this talk this evening is the first IAU Discourse devoted to something that astronomers cannot see at any wavelength: Dark Matter in the Universe.

scholarly journals Probes for 4th Generation Constituents of Dark Atoms in Higgs Boson Studies at the LHC

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Yu. Khlopov ◽  
R. M. Shibaev
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Higgs Boson ◽  
Big Bang ◽  
Decay Rates ◽  
Neutral Atoms ◽  
Big Bang Nucleosynthesis ◽  
Charged Species ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Direct Dark Matter

The nonbaryonic dark matter of the Universe can consist of new stable charged species, bound in heavy neutral “atoms” by ordinary Coulomb interaction. StableU-(anti-U)quarks of 4th generation, bound in stable colorless(U- U- U-)clusters, are captured by the primordial helium, produced in Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, thus forming neutral “atoms” of O-helium (OHe), a specific nuclear interacting dark matter that can provide solution for the puzzles of direct dark matter searches. However, the existence of the 4th generation quarks and leptons should influence the production and decay rates of Higgs boson and is ruled out by the experimental results of the Higgs boson searches at the LHC, if the Higgs boson coupling to 4th generation fermions is not suppressed. Here, we argue that the difference between the three known quark-lepton families and the 4th family can naturally lead to suppression of this coupling, relating the accelerator test for such a composite dark matter scenario to the detailed study of the production and modes of decay of the 125.5 GeV boson, discovered at the LHC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document