scholarly journals A Hybrid Scheme Motion Controller by Sliding Mode and Two-Degree-of-Freedom Controls to Minimize the Chattering

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Chiu-Keng Lai

Sliding mode control (SMC) is rapped for the chattering due to high gain control. However, high gain control causes the system robust. For developing a system with robustness of SMC, a servo motor motion controller combining the two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF) system and SMC is proposed. The discussed motion type is point-to-point control with the constraint of trapezoid velocity profile. SMC is designed to guide the motor motion to follow a predefined trail, and the inner 2DOF system is used to compensate the deterioration due to the adoption of load observer. The proposed hybrid system is realized on a PC-based motion controller, and the validness is verified by simulation and experimental results.

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Achim Ilchmann ◽  
Eugene P. Ryan

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-116
Author(s):  
Normaisharah Mamat ◽  
Fitri Yakub ◽  
Sheikh Ahmad Zaki Sheikh Salim

Two degree of freedom (2 DOF) mass spring damper system is used in representing as building structure that dealing with the earthquake vibration. The real analytical input is used to the system that taken at El Centro earthquake that occurred in May 1940 with magnitude of 7.1 Mw. Two types of controller are presented in controlling the vibration which are fuzzy logic (FL) and sliding mode controller (SMC). The paper was aimed to improve the performance of building structure towards vibration based on proposed controllers. Fuzzy logic and sliding mode controller are widely known with robustness character. The mathematical model of two degree of freedom mass spring damper wasis derived to obtain the relationship between mass, spring, damper, force and actuator. Fuzzy logic and sliding mode controllers were implemented to 2 DOF system to suppress the earthquake vibration of two storeys building. Matlab/Simulink was used in designing the system and controllers to present the result of two storeys displacement time response and input control voltage for uncontrolled and controlled system. Then the data of earthquake disturbance was taken based on real seismic occurred at El Centro to make it as the force disturbance input to the building structure system. The controllers proposed would minimize the vibration that used in sample earthquake disturbance data. The simulation result was carried out by using Matlab/Simulink. The simulation result showed sliding mode controller was better controller than fuzzy logic. In specific, by using the controller, earthquake vibration can be reduced.


1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.-H. Chuang ◽  
D.-N. Wu ◽  
Q. Wang

In order to prevent structural damages, it is more important to bound the vibration amplitude than to reduce the vibration energy. However, in the performance index for linear quadratic regulator (LQR), the instantaneous amplitude of vibration is not minimized. An ordinary LQR may have an unacceptable amplitude at some time instant but still have a good performance. In this paper, we have developed an LQR with adjustable gains to guarantee bounds on the vibration amplitude. For scalar systems, the weighting for control is switched between two values which give a low-gain control when the amplitude is inside the bound and a high-gain control when the amplitude is going to violate the given bound. For multivariable systems, by assuming a matching condition, a similar controller structure has been obtained. This controller is favored for application since the main structure of a common LQR is not changed; the additional high-gain control is required only if the vibration amplitude fails to stay inside the bound. We have applied this controller to a five-story building with active tendon controllers. The results show that the largest oscillation at the first story stays within a given bound when the building is subject to earthquake excitation.


1996 ◽  
Vol 116 (8) ◽  
pp. 868-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu Yamamoto ◽  
Takahiro Ara ◽  
Masaki Sugiura ◽  
Jun Sawaki ◽  
Kouki Matsuse

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document