scholarly journals Female Sex Offenders and Pariah Femininities: Rewriting the Sexual Scripts

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Hayes ◽  
Bethney Baker

This paper aims to analyze the way in which the media reports of sex offences tend to reinforce traditional sexual scripts and gender identities. Compared to investigations into male sex offenders, female sex offending is relatively underresearched, undertheorized, and misunderstood (Hayes and Carpenter, 2013). We argue that the media’s reinforcement of traditional scripts has hindered the development of awareness of sex offending by women, depicting them as aberrations, that is, as “female pariahs.” As Harris (2010) notes, female sex crimes cannot be explained by male theories of crime. To address this issue, we examined 487 media reports from Australia and the United Kingdom and found that, as key stakeholders in public debate, the media does indeed play a crucial role in shaping the public perceptions of female sex offenders as aberrations and pariahs. This distorted view influences approaches to understanding and acknowledging sex offending by women as well as hindering the safe and timely reporting of offences by victims.

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1044-1063
Author(s):  
Calli M. Cain ◽  
Amy L. Anderson

Traditional gender roles, sex scripts, and the way female sex offenders are portrayed in the media may lead to misconceptions about who can commit sexual offenses. Sexual crimes by women may go unnoticed or unreported if there is a general lack of awareness that females commit these crimes. Data from the 2012 Nebraska Annual Social Indicators Survey were used to determine whether the public perceives women as capable sex offenders and the perceived causes of female sex offending. The traditional focus on male sex offenders by researchers, media, and politicians, in addition to gender stereotypes, introduces the possibility of group differences (e.g., between men and women) in perceptions of female sex offenders. Consequently, two secondary analyses were conducted that tested for group differences in both the public’s perception of whether females can commit sex offenses and the explanations selected for why females sexually offend. The findings suggest that the public does perceive women as capable sex offenders, although there were group differences in the causal attributions for female sex offending.


2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Wijkman ◽  
Catrien Bijleveld ◽  
Jan Hendriks

Author(s):  
Ian A. Elliott ◽  
Alexandra Bailey

Author(s):  
Jason M. Smith ◽  
Carl B. Gacono

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Connie Hassett-Walker ◽  
Thomas Lateano ◽  
Michael Di Benedetto

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document