scholarly journals Corrosion Response of Ti6Al4V and Ti15Mo Dental Implant Alloys in the Presence of Listerine Oral Rinse

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahul Bhola ◽  
Charu Chandra ◽  
Faisal M. Alabbas ◽  
Sukumar Kundu ◽  
Brajendra Mishra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Normal Saline ◽  
Phase Structure ◽  
Saline Solution ◽  
Electrochemical Techniques ◽  
Circuit Modeling ◽  
Mouth Rinse ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Oral Rinse ◽  
Solution Interface ◽  
Implant Alloys

The influence of a commonly used antibacterial mouth rinse, Listerine, on the corrosion behavior of one of the commonly used titanium alloys Ti6Al4V (two-phase structure, i.e.,αandβ) and a newer Ti15Mo (singleβphase) in normal saline solution has been investigated using electrochemical techniques. Interfacial electrochemical changes occurring at the oxide-solution interface have been analysed using EIS circuit modeling. Listerine acts as a corrosion inhibitor for Ti15Mo alloy and a corrosion promoter for Ti6Al4V alloy.

Effects of Topical Oral Antiseptic Rinses on Bacterial Counts of Saliva in Healthy Human Subjects

1998 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 625-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Balbuena ◽  
Kweon I. Stambaugh ◽  
Sylvester G. Ramirez ◽  
Curtis Yeager
Keyword(s):  
Normal Saline ◽  
Saline Solution ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Colony Count ◽  
Healthy Human ◽  
Bacterial Colony ◽  
Bacterial Counts ◽  
Oral Rinse ◽  
Healthy Human Subjects ◽  
Aerobic And Anaerobic

Wound infections remain a significant source of morbidity in patients undergoing major head and neck operations that invade the aerodigestive tract. Infection rates have been significantly reduced by the administration of perioperative intravenous antibiotics; however, the incidence of infection remains unacceptably high. This study was undertaken to help identify an oral antiseptic that could significantly reduce the bacterial colony count of human saliva. A randomized, prospective clinical trial was conducted to analyze and compare the effects of Listerine antiseptic and Peridex oral rinse on the aerobic and anaerobic bacterial counts in healthy human subjects. Thirty healthy adult volunteers between the ages of 18 and 61 participated in the study. The patients were randomized to receive normal saline solution, Listerine antiseptic, or Peridex oral rinse. Aerobic and anaerobic bacterial colony counts of saliva were measured before treatment and at 1 and 4 hours after treatment. Both Listerine antiseptic and Peridex oral rinse significantly reduced bacterial counts at 1 hour after treatment in our volunteers. At 4 hours after treatment, Peridex oral rinse showed a further reduction in the bacterial colony count whereas Listerine antiseptic showed no difference compared with normal saline solution. At 4 hours after treatment, Peridex oral rinse reduced the total bacterial colony count by 85%. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;118:625–9.)

Alteplase: Stability and Bioactivity after Dilution in Normal Saline Solution

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles P. Semba ◽  
Suzanne Weck ◽  
Thomas Patapoff
Keyword(s):  
Normal Saline ◽  
Saline Solution

scholarly journals CASE OF TRANSFUSION OF THE NORMAL SALINE SOLUTION.

The Lancet ◽  
1889 ◽  
Vol 133 (3420) ◽  
pp. 527 ◽  
Author(s):  
WalterHenry Brown
Keyword(s):  
Normal Saline ◽  
Saline Solution

Are Lactated Ringer’s Solution and Normal Saline Solution Equal with Regard to Coagulation?: Retracted

2002 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 378-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Boldt ◽  
G. Haisch ◽  
S. Suttner ◽  
B. Kumle ◽  
F. Schellhase
Keyword(s):  
Normal Saline ◽  
Saline Solution ◽  
Ringer’S Solution ◽  
Lactated Ringer's Solution

scholarly journals Comparative results of gastric submucosal injection with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose and normal saline solution in a porcine model

2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano Lenz ◽  
Veruska Di Sena ◽  
Frank S. Nakao ◽  
Gustavo Paulo de Andrade ◽  
Maria Rachel da Silveira Rohr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Thermal Injury ◽  
Porcine Model ◽  
Saline Solution ◽  
Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose ◽  
Three Solutions ◽  
Submucosal Injection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Comparative Results

CONTEXT: Endoscopic mucosal resection is an established modality for excision of sessile lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. Submucosal fluid injection creates a cushion and may prevent thermal injury and perforation. OBJECTIVES: This blind study investigated the performance of three different solutions to create submucosal fluid cushions in porcine stomach. METHODS: Three solutions were injected in the stomach of nine pigs BR1: normal saline solution, carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 0.25%. In each pig, submucosal injections with 6 mL per test-solution were performed. One drop of methylene blue was added to all injections for better visualization. The time for the bleb to disappear was recorded. RESULTS: The overall median time of visible submucosal cushion was 37 minutes (range 12-60 min) for hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, 31 minutes for carboxymethylcellulose (range 10-43 min) and 19 minutes for normal saline solution (range 8-37 min). There was no statistically significant difference neither between normal saline solution and carboxymethylcellulose (P = 0.146) nor carboxymethylcellulose and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (P = 0.119) but the median duration of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose was significantly longer than normal saline solution (P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The length of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose submucosal fluid cushion is longer in comparison with normal saline solution. The median time for carboxymethylcellulose was not longer than normal saline solution. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, in the concentration of 0.25%, may be a durable alternative for submucosal injection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document