scholarly journals Microtensile Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Luting Cements to Ceramics

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoko Abo ◽  
Shigeru Uno ◽  
Masahiro Yoshiyama ◽  
Toshimoto Yamada ◽  
Nobuhiro Hanada
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Adhesive Luting

Microtensile bond-strength of self-adhesive luting cements to chlorhexidine pre-treated dentin

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. e7
Author(s):  
V.D. Hipolito ◽  
P.H.P. D’alpino ◽  
F.B. Piveta ◽  
N. Silikas ◽  
F.P. Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Adhesive Luting

Microtensile bond strength of new self-adhesive luting agents and conventional multistep systems

2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (5) ◽  
pp. 306-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronaldo G. Viotti ◽  
Alline Kasaz ◽  
Carlos E. Pena ◽  
Rodrigo S. Alexandre ◽  
Cesar A. Arrais ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Luting Agents ◽  
Adhesive Luting

Microtensile Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Luting Cements to Dentin by the Type of Dentin Adhesives

2007 ◽  
Vol 361-363 ◽  
pp. 889-892
Author(s):  
S.Y. Kim ◽  
D.W. Kim ◽  
S.H. Park ◽  
K.K. Choi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Dentin Adhesives ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars

This study was performed to investigate the bond strength between 4 dentin adhesives and resin luting cements by means of μTBS test. The materials used in this study were four resin cements (Choice, Panavia F, RelyX ARC, Bistite II DC), one 3-step adhesive (All-Bond2), one 2- step self-etching adhesive (Clearfil SE-Bond) and two 1-step self-etching adhesives(Prompt L-Pop and One-Up Bond F). Combination of 4 different dentin adhesives with 4 resin cements made up 16 experimental groups. Extracted human mandibular third molars without caries and restoratives were stored in saline and used within 1 month of extraction. All adhesive systems and resin cements were manipulated and applied to the dentin surfaces according to the manufactures’ instructions. The resin composite “overlays” prepared with 6 mm thickness (Tescera, Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA) were luted with each resin cement. Each sample was measured μTBS. 1-step self-etching adhesives coupled with all resin luting cements used in this study resulted in lower bond strength except of OU-PA group. When Choice, RelyX ARC and Bistite II were used, Clearfil SE-Bond showed significantly higher μTBS values than 1-step self-etching adhesives (p<0.05). Clearfil SE-Bond did not show significant μTBS values than All-Bond 2 that is conventional 3-step dentin adhesive (p>0.05).

scholarly journals The Effect of Surface Preparation and Luting Agent on Bond Strength to a Zirconium-based Ceramic

10.2341/07-14 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 623-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. Senyilmaz ◽  
W. M. Palin ◽  
A. C. C. Shortall ◽  
F. J. T. Burke
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Surface Preparation ◽  
Adhesive Layer ◽  
Tooth Size ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Luting Agent ◽  
Adhesive Luting ◽  
Ceramic Restorations ◽  
Effect Of Surface

Clinical Relevance Although clinical situations may exist where the adhesive luting of high-density milled ceramics for crown or fixed partial dentures are not required, certain clinical situations, such as the chairside repair of existing ceramic restorations, poor retention or inadequate abutment tooth size, will require a durable adhesive layer between the resin and ceramic. This study investigates the efficacy of modern “self-adhesive” luting cements on a zirconia-based ceramic following various surface preparations

Effects of Immediate Dentin Sealing and Pulpal Pressure on Resin Cement Bond Strength and Nanoleakage

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
VB Santana ◽  
RS de Alexandre ◽  
JA Rodrigues ◽  
C Ely ◽  
AF Reis
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Strength Data ◽  
Tukey Test ◽  
Luting Agents ◽  
Adhesive Luting ◽  
Scanning Electron

SUMMARY Objective: The object of this study was to evaluate the simulated pulpal pressure (SPP) and immediate dentin sealing technique (IDS) effects on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and nanoleakage of interfaces produced by different luting agents. Methods and Materials: Two self-adhesive luting agents (RelyX Unicem [UC] and Clearfil SA Luting [SA]) and two conventional luting agents (Rely X ARC [RX] and Panavia F [PF]) were evaluated. Eighty human molars were divided in four groups according to luting agents. Each group was subdivided according to SPP (with or without) and dentin sealing (immediate or delayed) using Clearfil SE Bond (n=5). After IDS was performed, specimens were stored in water for seven days before luting procedures. Composite blocks were luted according to the manufacturers' instructions. One half of the specimens were subjected to 15 cm H2O of hydrostatic pressure for 24 hours before cementation procedures and continued for 24 hours afterward. Then, restored teeth were sectioned into beams and tested in tension. Two additional teeth per group were prepared for nanoleakage evaluation with scanning electron microscopy. Bond strength data were statistically analyzed by three-way analysis of variance and Tukey test. Results: μTBS of RX decreased when it was subjected to SPP without IDS. However, in the same conditions, μTBS of UC increased. The IDS prevented negative influence of SPP on μTBS of RX and PF; however, a decrease in μTBS of SA and UC was observed. Except for RX, IDS increased μTBS for all resin cements. Conclusion: Independent of SPP, the IDS technique obtained higher μTBS for PF, SA, and UC and did not influence RX μTBS.

scholarly journals Effect of Curing Mode on Microtensile Bond Strength to Dentin of Two Dual-cured Adhesive Systems in Combination with Resin Luting Cements for Indirect Restorations

10.2341/06-4 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. G. Arrais ◽  
M. Giannini ◽  
F. A. Rueggeberg ◽  
D. H. Pashley
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Fifth Generation ◽  
Light Curing ◽  
Separate Step ◽  
Composite Restoration

Clinical Relevance The separate step of light curing the adhesive resin component of some fourth and fifth generation dual-cured adhesive systems may be eliminated prior to cementation of an indirect resin composite restoration without deterioration in microtensile bond strength.

The Influence of Luting Systems on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Dentin to Indirect Resin-based Composite and Ceramic Restorations

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 328-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. D'Arcangelo ◽  
F. De Angelis ◽  
M. D'Amario ◽  
S. Zazzeroni ◽  
C. Ciampoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Glass Ceramic ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
The Self ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Luting Agents ◽  
Adhesive Luting ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Ceramic Restorations ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance Compared to self-etch and self-adhesive luting systems, the two etch-and-rinse luting agents evaluated in the current study provided more reliable bonding when used to bond indirect resin-based composite restorations to sound dentin. On the contrary, the self-adhesive luting system showed the highest mean bond strength for the cementation of glass ceramic restorations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document