scholarly journals Effect of Curing Mode on Microtensile Bond Strength to Dentin of Two Dual-cured Adhesive Systems in Combination with Resin Luting Cements for Indirect Restorations

10.2341/06-4 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. G. Arrais ◽  
M. Giannini ◽  
F. A. Rueggeberg ◽  
D. H. Pashley
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Fifth Generation ◽  
Light Curing ◽  
Separate Step ◽  
Composite Restoration

Clinical Relevance The separate step of light curing the adhesive resin component of some fourth and fifth generation dual-cured adhesive systems may be eliminated prior to cementation of an indirect resin composite restoration without deterioration in microtensile bond strength.

Microtensile Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Resin Luting Cements to Dentin by the Type of Dentin Adhesives

2007 ◽  
Vol 361-363 ◽  
pp. 889-892
Author(s):  
S.Y. Kim ◽  
D.W. Kim ◽  
S.H. Park ◽  
K.K. Choi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Dentin Adhesives ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars

This study was performed to investigate the bond strength between 4 dentin adhesives and resin luting cements by means of μTBS test. The materials used in this study were four resin cements (Choice, Panavia F, RelyX ARC, Bistite II DC), one 3-step adhesive (All-Bond2), one 2- step self-etching adhesive (Clearfil SE-Bond) and two 1-step self-etching adhesives(Prompt L-Pop and One-Up Bond F). Combination of 4 different dentin adhesives with 4 resin cements made up 16 experimental groups. Extracted human mandibular third molars without caries and restoratives were stored in saline and used within 1 month of extraction. All adhesive systems and resin cements were manipulated and applied to the dentin surfaces according to the manufactures’ instructions. The resin composite “overlays” prepared with 6 mm thickness (Tescera, Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA) were luted with each resin cement. Each sample was measured μTBS. 1-step self-etching adhesives coupled with all resin luting cements used in this study resulted in lower bond strength except of OU-PA group. When Choice, RelyX ARC and Bistite II were used, Clearfil SE-Bond showed significantly higher μTBS values than 1-step self-etching adhesives (p<0.05). Clearfil SE-Bond did not show significant μTBS values than All-Bond 2 that is conventional 3-step dentin adhesive (p>0.05).

scholarly journals Efficacy of multi-mode adhesive systems on dentin wettability and microtensile bond strength of resin composite

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (21) ◽  
pp. 2405-2418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neslihan Arhun ◽  
Derya Merve Halacoglu ◽  
Zümrüt Ceren Ozduman ◽  
Duygu Tuncer
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Multi Mode

Polymerization Shrinkage Influences Microtensile Bond Strength

2007 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Cabrera ◽  
J.C. de la Macorra
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Polymerization Shrinkage ◽  
Incisal Edge ◽  
Group A ◽  
Light Curing ◽  
Group B ◽  
Unfilled Resin

Shrinkage results from a complex spatial strain network, producing movements within materials. The purpose of this study was to test whether microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a light-curing resin composite to enamel depends on distance to the center of the curing mass. Labial surfaces of bovine incisors were ground flat, divided into 2 groups (n = 8), acid-etched, and coated with an unfilled resin bond. A resin-based composite was placed in one increment (group A) or separately at gingival, central, and incisal sites (group B), and light-cured. Teeth were sectioned, yielding stick-shaped specimens assigned to one of 9 groups according to distance to incisal edge of restoration (NDistanc). Microtensile bond strength was transformed to percentages of its maximum values within each tooth (PMPa). Comparisons within groups showed (group A) that mean PMPa decreased from central to gingival and from central to incisal (p < 0.01). Comparisons between groups showed that mean PMPa was significantly lower in group A compared with group B, only at gingival and incisal sites. Microtensile bond strength significantly decreased as the distance increased to the center of the curing mass.

scholarly journals Microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin with or without application of an intermediate flowable resin layer

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Fernando De Goes ◽  
Marcelo Giannini ◽  
Vinícius Di Hipólito ◽  
Marcela Rocha de Oliveira Carrilho ◽  
Márcia Daronch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Composite Layer ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Flowable Composite ◽  
Low Viscosity ◽  
Occlusal Surfaces ◽  
Diamond Saw

This study evaluated the effect of flowable composite resin application on the microtensile bond strength (muTBS) of adhesive systems to dentin. Occlusal surfaces of human third molars were ground to obtain flat dentin surfaces. The crown of each tooth was sectioned occluso-gingivally into four quarters with a water-cooled diamond saw. One of the following adhesive systems was applied to dentin surface in each quarter of the same tooth, following manufacturers' instructions: Scotchbond Multipurpose, Single Bond Adper Prompt and Clearfil SE Bond. Experimental and control groups received the same treatment, except for the fact that a layer of flowable composite (Filtek Flow) was placed and light-cured on top of the adhesive layer in the specimens of the experimental groups. Resin composite (Filtek Z250) crown buildups were then made on the bonded surfaces and incrementally light-cured for 20 s. The restored teeth were stored in water at 37ºC for 24 h. Each tooth quarter was serially cut in a longitudinal direction in order to obtain several bonded sticks (0.9-mm² in cross-section). Maximal microtensile stress (in MPa) at failure was recorded using a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. Placement of a low-viscosity resin to the hybridized dentin increased the muTBS for all tested adhesive systems. However, such increase was significant only for Clearfil SE Bond (p<0.05). When the restorations were placed without low-viscosity resin, Clearfil SE Bond presented higher muTBS than Adper Prompt (p<0.05). For the groups treated with flowable composite, Clearfil SE Bond produced the highest muTBS means to dentin. In conclusion, the effect of the addition of an intermediate flowable composite layer on muTBS to dentin was material-dependent and resulted in an increased adhesion for all tested materials, though with significance only for Clearfil SE Bond.

Effect of Different Surface Treatments of Resin Relined Fiber Posts Cemented With Self-adhesive Resin Cement on Push-out and Microtensile Bond Strength Tests

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. E185-E195
Author(s):  
RV Machry ◽  
PE Fontana ◽  
TC Bohrer ◽  
LF Valandro ◽  
OB Kaizer
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Air Abrasion ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement ◽  
Push Out

Clinical Relevance When luting relined fiber posts with self-adhesive cement, the surface treatment of the posts influences the adhesion of the fiber posts to root dentin. SUMMARY This study evaluated the effect of surface treatment and silanization of resin composite on the bond strength of relined fiber posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. Push-out and microtensile bond strength (MTBS) tests were performed in this study. The endodontic treatment of 80 single-rooted bovine teeth was first performed in the push- out test segment, followed by weakening the intracanal walls by diamond bur. Then, the glass fiber posts were adapted with resin composite to fill the root canals, followed by photoactivation and resin surface conditioning according to four different experimental conditions: no conditioning as control, 10% hydrofluoric acid, 35% hydrogen peroxide, or air abrasion with alumina particle (all groups were subdivided into “with silanization” or “without silanization,” thus totaling eight experimental groups). Self-adhesive resin cement was used for the post cementation. Four slices per tooth were obtained for the push-out tests. Next, 160 blocks of resin composite were first produced for the MTBS tests; their bonding surfaces were conditioned (as mentioned, ie, eight treatments), and they were cemented to each other. The 80 sets (n=10/treatment) were then cut into microbars (16/set): eight were immediately tested, while the other eight were thermocycled (12,000×) and stored (120 days) before MTBS. Failure modes and topographic analyses were performed after treatments. There was no statistically significant difference for the push-out results. In MTBS, surface treatment and silanization had a significant effect (p&lt;0.001). Aging decreased bond strength for all groups. Considering the aged groups, air abrasion promoted the highest values and silanization improved bond strength for all treatments except air abrasion. The alumina particle air abrasion of the relining resin composite promoted the highest bond strengths when luting with self-adhesive resin cement.

Effect of Cigarette Smoke on Resin Composite Bond Strength to Enamel and Dentin Using Different Adhesive Systems

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. E57-E63 ◽  
Author(s):  
JD Theobaldo ◽  
A Catelan ◽  
U Rodrigues-Filho ◽  
GM Marchi ◽  
DANL Lima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Cigarette Smoke ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Tooth Structure ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Microshear Bond Strength ◽  
Intermediate Value ◽  
Composite Restoration

SUMMARY Objective: To evaluate the microshear bond strength of composite resin restorations in dental blocks with or without exposure to cigarette smoke. Method: Eighty bovine dental blocks were divided into eight groups (n=10) according to the type of adhesive (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA [SBMP]; Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE [SB]; Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray Medical Inc, Okayama, Japan [CSEB]; Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE [SBU]) and exposure to smoke (no exposure; exposure for five days/20 cigarettes per day). The adhesive systems were applied to the tooth structure, and the blocks received a composite restoration made using a matrix of perforated pasta. Data were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey test (α&lt;0.05). Results: For enamel, there was no difference between the presence or absence of cigarette smoke (p=0.1397); however, there were differences among the adhesive systems (p&lt;0.001). CSEB showed higher values and did not differ from SBU, but both were statistically different from SB. The SBMP showed intermediate values, while SB demonstrated lower values. For dentin, specimens subjected to cigarette smoke presented bond strength values that were lower when compared with those not exposed to smoke (p&lt;0.001). For the groups without exposure to cigarette smoke, CSEB showed higher values, differing from SBMP. SB and SBU showed intermediary values. For the groups with exposure to cigarette smoke, SBU showed values that were higher and statistically different from SB and CSEB, which presented lower values of bond strength. SBMP demonstrated an intermediate value of bond strength. Conclusion: The exposure of dentin to cigarette smoke influenced the bonding strength of adhesives, but no differences were noted in enamel.

scholarly journals Hybridization quality and bond strength of adhesive systems according to interaction with dentin

2013 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 315-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana Andrea Salvio ◽  
Vinicius Di Hipólito ◽  
Adriano Luis Martins ◽  
Mario Fernando de Goes
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
One Step ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Ammoniacal Silver ◽  
One Way Anova

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the hybridization quality and bond strength of adhesives to dentin. Materials and Methods: Ten human molars were ground to expose the dentin and then sectioned in four tooth-quarters. They were randomly divided into 5 groups according to the adhesive used: Two single-step self-etch adhesives - Adper Prompt (ADP) and Xeno III (XE), two two-step self-etching primer systems - Clearfil SE Bond (SE) and Adhe SE (ADSE), and one one-step etch-and-rinse system - Adper Single Bond (SB). Resin composite (Filtek Z250) crown buildups were made on the bonded surfaces and incrementally light-cured for 20 s. The restored tooth-quarters were stored in water at 37΀C for 24 h and then sectioned into beams (0.8 mm 2 in cross-section). Maximal microtensile bond strength (μ-TBS) was recorded (0.5 mm/min in crosshead speed). The results were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey′s test (α = 0.05). Thirty additional teeth were used to investigate the hybridization quality by SEM using silver methenamine or ammoniacal silver nitrate dyes. Results: SE reached significantly higher μ-TBS (P < 0.05); no significance was found between ADSE and XE (P > 0.05), and between SB and ADP (P > 0.05); ADSE and XE were significantly higher than SB and ADP (P < 0.05). The bonding interface of SB showed the most intense silver uptake. SE and ADSE showed more favorable hybridization quality than that observed for ADP and XE. Conclusions: The bond strength and hybridization quality were affected by the interaction form of the adhesives with dentin. The hybridization quality was essential to improve the immediate μ-TBS to dentin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document