scholarly journals Preclinical Evidence for the Benefits of Penile Rehabilitation Therapy following Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy

2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Albersen ◽  
S. Joniau ◽  
H. Claes ◽  
H. Van Poppel

Erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy remains a frequent problem despite the development of nerve-sparing techniques. This erectile dysfunction is believed to be neurogenic, enhanced by hypoxia-induced structural changes which result in additional veno-occlusive dysfunction. Recently, daily use of intracavernous vasoactive substances and oral use of PDE5-inhibitors have been clinically studied for treatment of postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction. Since these studies showed benefits of “penile rehabilitation therapy,” these effects have been studied in a preclinical setting. We reviewed experimental literature on erectile tissue preserving and neuroregenerative treatment strategies, and found that preservation of the erectile tissue by the use of intracavernous nitric oxide donors or vasoactive substances, oral PDE5-inhibitors, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy improved erectile function by antifibrotic effects and preservation of smooth muscle. Furthermore, neuroregenerative strategies using neuroimmunophilin ligands, neurotrophins, growth factors, and stem cell therapy show improved erectile function by preservation of NOS-containing nerve fibers.

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yagil Barazani ◽  
Peter J. Stahl ◽  
Harris M. Nagler ◽  
Doron S. Stember

Erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy (RP) is an increasingly prominent quality-of-life outcome following surgery. Following RP many men, despite the advent of cavernous nerve-sparing surgical technique, have moderately or significantly impaired erectile function (EF). The term penile rehabilitation (PR) is used to define interventions that maintain the health of erectile tissue in the context of nervous, vascular, and structural tissue injury. The goal of PR is to regain, as closely re-approximate, preoperative erectile function. PR is based on an increasing volume of preclinical and clinical data, but conclusive evidence of efficacy has not been established, and therefore the concept of PR remains controversial. The optimal PR regimen has not been established, but all strategies rely on one or more erectile dysfunction treatments to be administered on a regular basis regardless of actual use for sexual activity. This review highlights recent studies and evidence related to PR.


F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 1923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gideon Blecher ◽  
Khaled Almekaty ◽  
Odunayo Kalejaiye ◽  
Suks Minhas

In men undergoing radical treatment for prostate cancer, erectile function is one of the most important health-related quality-of-life outcomes influencing patient choice in treatment. Penile rehabilitation has emerged as a therapeutic measure to prevent erectile dysfunction and expedite return of erectile function after radical prostatectomy. Penile rehabilitation involves a program designed to increase the likelihood of return to baseline-level erectile function, as opposed to treatment, which implies the therapeutic treatment of symptoms, a key component of post–radical prostatectomy management. Several pathological theories form the basis for rehabilitation, and a plethora of treatments are currently in widespread use. However, whilst there is some evidence supporting the concept of penile rehabilitation from animal studies, randomised controlled trials are contradictory in outcomes. Similarly, urological guidelines are conflicted in terms of recommendations. Furthermore, it is clear that in spite of the lack of evidence for the role of penile rehabilitation, many urologists continue to employ some form of rehabilitation in their patients after radical prostatectomy. This is a significant burden to health resources in public-funded health economies, and no effective cost-benefit analysis has been undertaken to support this practice. Thus, further research is warranted to provide both scientific and clinical evidence for this contemporary practice and the development of preventative strategies in treating erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 87-94
Author(s):  
A. E. Osadchinskiy ◽  
I. S. Pavlov ◽  
S. V. Kotov

Introduction. In healthy men, a significant increase in pO2 in the cavernous tissue occurs during episodes of nocturnal erections. This process ensures sufficient oxygenation and high-pressure substances such as prostaglandin-E1 and nitric oxide. These substances suppress the expression of transforming growth factor β1, thereby preventing collagen synthesis and the development of cavernous fibrosis. In patients undergoing nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, nocturnal erections are absent, hypoxia inhibits the production of PGE-i, and neuropraxia inhibits NO. Thus, cavernous fibrosis develops through the production of pro-apoptotic and profibrotic factors, resulting in persistent erectile dysfunction. The importance of a vacuum in penile rehabilitation for the prevention of penile cavernous hypoxia is not fully understood. This is due to the deficiency of data on the gas composition of cavernous blood when a vacuum-induced erection is achieved.Purpose of the study. To investigate the cavernous blood at the time of vacuum-induced erection, to analyze the obtained results with the International Index of Erectile Function score and with the values of penile hemodynamics.Materials and methods. The study included i5 patients with prostate cancer and preserved sexual function. The average age of all men was 57.87 ±4.36 years. All patients underwent a preoperative comprehensive assessment of erectile function: International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire, dynamic duplex penile ultrasound. Immediately prior to the surgery, penile blood was collected at the time of achieving a vacuum-induced erection. The gas composition and oxygenation were assessed using the values of the partial oxygen pressure, carbon dioxide and saturation in accordance with the approved standards to differentiate arterial and venous blood. Statistical data processing was carried out using the PASW Statistics 22 software (IBM SPSS, IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA)Results. All patients were divided into 3 groups depending on the gas composition and oxygen level of the cavernous blood. Group I included 4 (26.6%) patients with a predominance of arterial blood, group II — 4 patients (26.6%) with venous blood and group III — 7 patients (46.6%) with a mixed composition of cavernous blood. The average International Index of Erectile Function score in group I was 23.5 [2i.0; 25.0], in group II — 22.0 [2i.0; 24.0] and in group III — 24.0 [i9.0; 25.0]. Peak systolic velocity (cm/s) in group I was 40.i [35.i; 45.2], in group II — 35.9 [29.5; 50.2], in group III — 32.5 [32.5; 34.4]. End-diastolic velocity (cm/s) in group I was 2.52 [0.55; i0.5], in group II — 8.3 [2.9; i0.8], in group III — 7.5 [7.5; 9.0]. Resistive index in group I was 0.87 [0.77; 0.98], in group II — 0.75 [0.63; 0.94], in group III — 0.75 [0.73; 0.75].Conclusions. Vacuum prophylaxis may be the method of choice for penile rehabilitation in patients after nerve-sparing radical prostateectomy, especially in the early postoperative period during neuropraxia. The use of vacuum devices should be prescribed to patients with preserved veno-occlusive mechanism, which should be confirmed by dynamic duplex penile ultrasound.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melianthe Nicolai ◽  
Ahmet Urkmez ◽  
Selcuk Sarikaya ◽  
Mikkel Fode ◽  
Marco Falcone ◽  
...  

After radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer, erectile dysfunction (ED) is the main complication next to urinary incontinence, affecting quality of life. The pathophysiology of ED after these treatments is believed to include neuropraxia causing reduced oxygenation and structural changes of the tissue in the corpora cavernosa. Next to the option of sparing the nerves during RP, research has been focusing on methods for penile rehabilitation after RP and RT, since it occurs often, even after nerve-sparing techniques were used. In animal studies, the use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) after cavernous nerve damage is supported, but results in human studies are contradictory. Non-medical treatment options such as vacuum device therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, yoga, aerobic, or pelvic floor training may be helpful, but evidence is scarce. Clear guidelines for penile rehabilitation are not yet available. However, care and support for ED after RP and RT is highly demanded by a large group of patients, so measures have to be taken even though the evidence is not strong yet. In this systematic review, an overview of the literature for penile rehabilitation and treatment options for ED after RP and RT is provided, using only randomized controlled trials (RCT).


2010 ◽  
Vol 183 (6) ◽  
pp. 2451-2456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R. McCullough ◽  
Wayne G. Hellstrom ◽  
Run Wang ◽  
Herbert Lepor ◽  
Kristofer R. Wagner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document