scholarly journals Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 397-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna Badgwell ◽  
Robert C. Bast Jr.

Despite advances in therapy, ovarian cancer remains the most deadly of the gynecological cancers. Less than 30% of women with advanced stage disease survive long-term. When diagnosed in stage I, up to 90% of patients can be cured with conventional surgery and chemotherapy. At present, only 25% of ovarian cancers are detected in stage I due, in part, to the absence of specific symptoms and to lack of an effective screening strategy. Early detection of ovarian cancer might significantly improve the overall survival rate of women with ovarian cancer if 1) most cancers are clonal and unifocal, arising in the ovary rather than in the peritoneum, 2) metastatic disease results from progression of clinically detectable stage I lesions, and 3) cancers remain localized for a sufficient interval to permit cost-effective screening. Given the prevalence of ovarian cancer, strategies for early detection must have high sensitivity for early stage disease (> 75%), but must have extremely high specificity (99.6%) to attain a positive predictive value of at least 10%. Transvaginal sonography (TVS), serum markers and a combination of the two modalities have been evaluated for early detection of ovarian cancer. Among the serum markers, CA125 has received the most attention, but lacks the sensitivity or specificity to function alone as a screening test. Greater specificity can be achieved by combining CA125 and TVS and/or by monitoring CA125 over time. Two stage screening strategies promise to be cost effective, where abnormal serum assays prompt TVS to detect lesions that require laparotomy. Accrual has been completed for a 200,000 woman trial in the United Kingdom that will test the ability of a rising CA125 to trigger TVS and subsequent exploratory surgery. Given the heterogeneity of ovarian cancer, it is unlikely that any single marker will be sufficiently sensitive to provide an effective initial screen. Sensitivity of serum assays might be enhanced by utilizing a panel of biomarkers. Candidate biomarkers have been discovered through empirical development of monoclonal antibodies, studies of gene expression, cloning of gene families and proteomic techniques. The development of technologies that measure multiple serum markers simultaneously, linked to the creation of statistical methods that enhance sensitivity without sacrificing specificity hold great promise.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5543-5543
Author(s):  
Lua R Eiriksson ◽  
Clare J Reade ◽  
Genevieve Lennox ◽  
Golnessa Mojtahedi ◽  
Joan Murphy ◽  
...  

5543 Background: Survival in women with ovarian cancer is strongly influenced by stage of disease at diagnosis. As such, strategies have been investigated to identify biomarkers for early detection. This premise assumes a progression of disease from early to late stage. Varying histologic subtypes in ovarian cancer have distinct etiologies. It is likely that early detection strategies will need to be subtype specific. This study sought to evaluate histologic subtypes, stage of disease, and screening performance in a cohort of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. Methods: This analysis was performed as an REB approved sub-study of a single institution ovarian cancer tumor banking protocol for which all patients presenting with suspected ovarian cancer, since February 2011, were eligible. This analysis included all patients with confirmed ovarian cancer. Patients were identified and tracked prospectively. Results: There were 135 patients with ovarian cancer (mean age 57 ± 12 years). 67% were post-menopausal. The distribution of histologic subtypes was 42% high-grade serous (HGS), 18% endometrioid, 12% clear cell, 6% low-grade serous (LGS), 6% sex-cord stromal, 5% germ cell, 3% mucinous, 3% mixed, 3% carcinosarcoma, and 2% other. 64 (47%) women presented with advanced disease with a median CA 125 of 260 (range 14 – 21 782), of whom 43 (68%) were found to have HGS histology. 46 (34%) patients presented with stage I disease with a median CA 125 of 41 (range 3 – 9305). Of these, the distribution of histologic subtypes included 13 (28%) endometrioid, 9 (20%) clear cell, 5 (11%) sex-cord stromal, 5 (11%) HGS, 3 (7%) mucinous and 23% other. Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) scoring for women with stage I disease (N = 35) revealed a false negative rate of 31%, including 4 clear cell, 2 LGS, 2 endometrioid and 1 each of HGS, mucinous, and mixed (clear cell and endometrioid) histologies. Conclusions: Stage I ovarian cancer consists primarily of non-serous histologies, which are not reliably detected using CA 125 and ultrasound markers. Current approaches to screening for early stage disease may require the identification of biomarkers unique to clear cell and endometrioid histologies and novel strategies for the identification of patients at risk for HGS carcinomas.


1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 3408-3415 ◽  
Author(s):  
K A Muñoz ◽  
L C Harlan ◽  
E L Trimble

PURPOSE To characterize treatments for ovarian cancer, to determine if recommended staging and treatment were provided, and to determine factors that influence receipt of recommended staging and treatment. METHODS A total of 785 women diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 1991 were selected from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Type and receipt of recommended staging and treatment were examined using data on surgery and physician-verified chemotherapy. RESULTS Most women with presumptive stage I and II ovarian cancer were treated with surgery alone (58%), while women with stage III or IV disease were treated with surgery plus platinum-based chemotherapy (75% stage III, 56% stage IV). Approximately 10% of women with presumptive stage I and II, 71% with stage III, and 53% with stage IV disease received recommended staging and treatment. The absence of lymphadenectomy and assignment of histologic grade were the primary reasons women with presumptive stage I and II cancer did not receive recommended staging and treatment, whereas for stages III and IV, it was due to older women not receiving surgery plus platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Age, stage, comorbidity, "other" race/ethnicity, and treatment at a facility with an approved residency training program were associated with whether recommended staging and therapy were received. CONCLUSION Older women with late-stage disease did not receive recommended treatment. The majority of women with early-stage disease did not receive recommended staging and treatment.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 390
Author(s):  
Nicola Martucci ◽  
Alessandro Morabito ◽  
Antonello La Rocca ◽  
Giuseppe De Luca ◽  
Rossella De Cecio ◽  
...  

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the most aggressive tumors, with a rapid growth and early metastases. Approximately 5% of SCLC patients present with early-stage disease (T1,2 N0M0): these patients have a better prognosis, with a 5-year survival up to 50%. Two randomized phase III studies conducted in the 1960s and the 1980s reported negative results with surgery in SCLC patients with early-stage disease and, thereafter, surgery has been largely discouraged. Instead, several subsequent prospective studies have demonstrated the feasibility of a multimodality approach including surgery before or after chemotherapy and followed in most studies by thoracic radiotherapy, with a 5-year survival probability of 36–63% for patients with completely resected stage I SCLC. These results were substantially confirmed by retrospective studies and by large, population-based studies, conducted in the last 40 years, showing the benefit of surgery, particularly lobectomy, in selected patients with early-stage SCLC. On these bases, the International Guidelines recommend a surgical approach in selected stage I SCLC patients, after adequate staging: in these cases, lobectomy with mediastinal lymphadenectomy is considered the standard approach. In all cases, surgery can be offered only as part of a multimodal treatment, which includes chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy and after a proper multidisciplinary evaluation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-62
Author(s):  
Baghdad Science Journal

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in women. To date, an effective screening tool for ovarian cancer has not been identified Several clinical and biological factors including serum cancer antigen 125 (CA- 125) have been assessed for prognostic and predictive relevance CA-125 is an epithelial marker derived from coelomic epithelium. It is elevated in 90% of advanced ovarian cancers and in 50% of early ovarian cancers while 20% of ovarian cancers have low or no expression of CA- 125 CA-125 concentrations were measured by Mini Vidas test (VIDAS CA125 II / BIOMERIEUX / France). The median CA-125 levels were significantly higher in the sera of ovarian cancer patients than in those with benign tumors and in healthy controls. However in correlation with stages the results showed that Patients with stage II have highly significant differences in level of serum CA125 compare with stage I in and stage III.CA125 showed low sensitivity to detect stage I carcinoma of the ovary which limits its value as an initial screening tool therefore combining of CA125 with other markers might enable improved early detection of ovarian cancer as compared with use of this marker alone.


Cancer ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (3) ◽  
pp. 548-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel N. Grisham ◽  
Gopa Iyer ◽  
Karuna Garg ◽  
Deborah DeLair ◽  
David M. Hyman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Alexios Papanikolaou ◽  
Anastasios Liberis ◽  
Anastasia Vatopoulou

Ovarian cancer is the second most common malignant disease of the female genital tract, but the first in mortality because it is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage. Options for early detection, diagnosis, and treatment are limited. Prevention of ovarian cancer relates to primary prevention by avoiding factors that are epidemiologically associated with an increased incidence of ovarian cancer and the adoption of protective habits. These include interventions to exclude the fallopian tubes and ovaries. Secondary prevention is related to early diagnosis. The chapter aims to summarize current evidence on prevention of ovarian cancer as well as role of surgery to prevent advanced-stage disease.


2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 133-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. V. Stevens ◽  
L. A. Liotta ◽  
E. C. Kohn

Ovarian cancer is a multifaceted disease wherein most women are diagnosed with advanced stage disease. One of the most imperative issues in ovarian cancer is early detection. Biomarkers that allow cancer detection at stage I, a time when the disease is amenable to surgical and chemotherapeutic cure in over 90% of patients, can dramatically alter the horizon for women with this disease. Recent developments in mass spectroscopy and protein chip technology coupled with bioinformatics have been applied to biomarker discovery. The complexity of the proteome is a rich resource from which the patterns can be gleaned; the pattern rather than its component parts is the diagnostic. Serum is a key source of putative protein biomarkers, and, by its nature, can reflect organ-confined events. Pioneering use of mass spectroscopy coupled with bioinformatics has been demonstrated as being capable of distinguishing serum protein pattern signatures of ovarian cancer in patients with early- and late-stage disease. This is a sensitive, precise, and promising tool for which further validation is needed to confirm that ovarian cancer serum protein signature patterns can be a robust biomarker approach for ovarian cancer diagnosis, yielding improved patient outcome and reducing the death and suffering from ovarian cancer.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (13) ◽  
pp. 2159-2166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoya Yurkovetsky ◽  
Steven Skates ◽  
Aleksey Lomakin ◽  
Brian Nolen ◽  
Trenton Pulsipher ◽  
...  

PurposeEarly detection of ovarian cancer has great promise to improve clinical outcome.Patients and MethodsNinety-six serum biomarkers were analyzed in sera from healthy women and from patients with ovarian cancer, benign pelvic tumors, and breast, colorectal, and lung cancers, using multiplex xMAP bead-based immunoassays. A Metropolis algorithm with Monte Carlo simulation (MMC) was used for analysis of the data.ResultsA training set, including sera from 139 patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, 149 patients with late-stage ovarian cancer, and 1,102 healthy women, was analyzed with MMC algorithm and cross validation to identify an optimal biomarker panel discriminating early-stage cancer from healthy controls. The four-biomarker panel providing the highest diagnostic power of 86% sensitivity (SN) for early-stage and 93% SN for late-stage ovarian cancer at 98% specificity (SP) was comprised of CA-125, HE4, CEA, and VCAM-1. This model was applied to an independent blinded validation set consisting of sera from 44 patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, 124 patients with late-stage ovarian cancer, and 929 healthy women, providing unbiased estimates of 86% SN for stage I and II and 95% SN for stage III and IV disease at 98% SP. This panel was selective for ovarian cancer showing SN of 33% for benign pelvic disease, SN of 6% for breast cancer, SN of 0% for colorectal cancer, and SN of 36% for lung cancer.ConclusionA panel of CA-125, HE4, CEA, and VCAM-1, after additional validation, could serve as an initial stage in a screening strategy for epithelial ovarian cancer.


Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Guo ◽  
Wei-Lei Yang ◽  
Daewoo Pak ◽  
Joseph Celestino ◽  
Karen H. Lu ◽  
...  

Early detection of ovarian cancer promises to reduce mortality. While serum CA125 can detect more than 60% of patients with early stage (I–II) disease, greater sensitivity might be observed with a panel of biomarkers. Ten protein antigens and 12 autoantibody biomarkers were measured in sera from 76 patients with early stage (I–II), 44 patients with late stage (III–IV) ovarian cancer and 200 healthy participants in the normal risk ovarian cancer screening study. A four-biomarker panel (CA125, osteopontin (OPN), macrophage inhibitory factor (MIF), and anti-IL-8 autoantibodies) detected 82% of early stage cancers compared to 65% with CA125 alone. In early stage subjects the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the panel (0.985) was significantly greater (p < 0.001) than the AUC for CA125 alone (0.885). Assaying an independent validation set of sera from 71 early stage ovarian cancer patients, 45 late stage patients and 131 healthy women, AUC in early stage disease was improved from 0.947 with CA125 alone to 0.974 with the four-biomarker panel (p = 0.015). Consequently, OPN, MIF and IL-8 autoantibodies can be used in combination with CA125 to distinguish ovarian cancer patients from healthy controls with high sensitivity. Osteopontin appears to be a robust biomarker that deserves further evaluation in combination with CA125.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document