Role of Intracortical Inhibition in Selective Hand Muscle Activation

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 2014-2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathy M. Stinear ◽  
Winston D. Byblow
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Index Finger ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Dominant Hand ◽  
Abductor Pollicis Brevis ◽  
Computer Mouse ◽  
Finger Flexion

Previous studies have shown that intracortical inhibition (ICI) plays an important role in shaping the output from primary motor cortex (M1). This study explored the muscle specificity and temporal modulation of ICI during the performance of a phasic index finger flexion task. Fifteen subjects were asked to rest their dominant hand on a computer mouse and depress the mouse button using their index finger in time with a 1-Hz auditory metronome, while keeping the rest of their hand as relaxed as possible. Responses to single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscles while subjects were at rest and during “on” and “off” phases of the task. For FDI during the on phase, motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and pretrigger EMG increased and ICI decreased, as expected. This pattern of modulation was also observed for APB in seven subjects. The remaining eight subjects demonstrated a decrease in MEP amplitude and increase in ICI for APB during the on phase. This was associated with significantly less APB activation during the on phase. These findings suggest that an increase in ICI and decrease in corticospinal excitability can prevent unwanted muscle activation in a muscle-specific, temporally modulated manner.

Task-related changes in intracortical inhibition assessed with paired- and triple-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (5) ◽  
pp. 1470-1479 ◽  
Author(s):  
George M. Opie ◽  
Michael C. Ridding ◽  
John G. Semmler
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Index Finger ◽  
Precision Grip ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Presynaptic Mechanisms ◽  
First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle

Recent research has demonstrated a task-related modulation of postsynaptic intracortical inhibition within primary motor cortex for tasks requiring isolated (abduction) or synergistic (precision grip) muscle activation. The current study sought to investigate task-related changes in pre- and postsynaptic intracortical inhibition in motor cortex. In 13 young adults (22.5 ± 3.5 yr), paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to measure short (SICI)- and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) (i.e., postsynaptic motor cortex inhibition) in first dorsal interosseous muscle, and triple-pulse TMS was used to investigate changes in SICI-LICI interactions (i.e., presynaptic motor cortex inhibition). These measurements were obtained at rest and during muscle activation involving isolated abduction of the index finger and during a precision grip using the index finger and thumb. SICI was reduced during abduction and precision grip compared with rest, with greater reductions during precision grip. The modulation of LICI during muscle activation depended on the interstimulus interval (ISI; 100 and 150 ms) but was not different between abduction and precision grip. For triple-pulse TMS, SICI was reduced in the presence of LICI at both ISIs in resting muscle (reflecting presynaptic motor cortex inhibition) but was only modulated at the 150-ms ISI during index finger abduction. Results suggest that synergistic contractions are accompanied by greater reductions in postsynaptic motor cortex inhibition than isolated contractions, but the contribution of presynaptic mechanisms to this disinhibition is limited. Furthermore, timing-dependent variations in LICI provide additional evidence that measurements using different ISIs may not represent activation of the same cortical process.

scholarly journals Modulation of motor cortex inhibition during motor imagery

2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 1776-1784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin W. X. Chong ◽  
Cathy M. Stinear
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Imagery ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Muscle Relaxation ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Abductor Pollicis Brevis ◽  
Voluntary Muscle ◽  
Abductor Digiti Minimi

Motor imagery (MI) is similar to overt movement, engaging common neural substrates and facilitating the corticomotor pathway; however, it does not result in excitatory descending motor output. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to assess inhibitory networks in the primary motor cortex via measures of 1-ms short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI), and late cortical disinhibition (LCD). These measures are thought to reflect extrasynaptic GABAA tonic inhibition, postsynaptic GABAB inhibition, and presynaptic GABAB disinhibition, respectively. The behavior of 1-ms SICI, LICI, and LCD during MI has not yet been explored. This study aimed to investigate how 1-ms SICI, LICI, and LCD are modulated during MI and voluntary relaxation (VR) of a target muscle. Twenty-five healthy young adults participated. TMS was used to assess nonconditioned motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, 1-ms SICI, 100- (LICI100) and 150-ms LICI, and LCD in the right abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and right abductor digiti minimi during rest, MI, and VR of the hand. Compared with rest, MEP amplitudes were facilitated in APB during MI. SICI was not affected by task or muscle. LICI100 decreased in both muscles during VR but not MI, whereas LCD was recruited in both muscles during both tasks. This indicates that VR modulates postsynaptic GABAB inhibition, whereas both tasks modulate presynaptic GABAB inhibition in a non-muscle-specific way. This study highlights further neurophysiological parallels between actual and imagined movement, which may extend to voluntary relaxation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study to investigate how 1-ms short-interval intracortical inhibition, long-interval intracortical inhibition, and late cortical disinhibition are modulated during motor imagery and voluntary muscle relaxation. We present novel findings of decreased 100-ms long-interval intracortical inhibition during voluntary muscle relaxation and increased late cortical disinhibition during both motor imagery and voluntary muscle relaxation.

scholarly journals Demand on skillfulness modulates interhemispheric inhibition of motor cortices

2016 ◽  
Vol 115 (6) ◽  
pp. 2803-2813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miles Wischnewski ◽  
Greg M. Kowalski ◽  
Farrah Rink ◽  
Samir R. Belagaje ◽  
Marc W. Haut ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Task ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Small Targets ◽  
Healthy Participants

The role of primary motor cortex (M1) in the control of hand movements is still unclear. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of unimanual performance reported a relationship between level of precision of a motor task and additional ipsilateral M1 (iM1) activation. In the present study, we determined whether the demand on accuracy of a movement influences the magnitude of the inhibitory effect between primary motor cortices (IHI). We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to measure active IHI (aIHI) of the iM1 on the contralateral M1 (cM1) in the premovement period of a left-hand motor task. Ten healthy participants manipulated a joystick to point to targets of two different sizes. For aIHI, the conditioning stimulus (CS) was applied to iM1, and the test stimulus (TS) to cM1, with an interstimulus interval of 10 ms. The amount of the inhibitory effect of the CS on the motor-evoked potential (MEP) of the subsequent TS was expressed as percentage of the mean MEP amplitude evoked by the single TS. Across different time points of aIHI measurements in the premovement period, there was a significant effect for target size on aIHI. Preparing to point to small targets was associated with weaker aIHI compared with pointing to large targets. The present findings suggest that, during the premovement period, aIHI from iM1 on cM1 is modulated by the demand on accuracy of the motor task. This is consistent with task fMRI findings showing bilateral M1 activation during high-precision movements but only unilateral M1 activity during low-precision movements.

scholarly journals Corticospinal excitability underlying digit force planning for grasping in humans

2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (12) ◽  
pp. 2560-2569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pranav Parikh ◽  
Marco Davare ◽  
Patrick McGurrin ◽  
Marco Santello
Keyword(s):  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
Reach To Grasp ◽  
Grasp Planning ◽  
Sensorimotor Memory ◽  
Force Planning ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition And Facilitation

Control of digit forces for grasping relies on sensorimotor memory gained from prior experience with the same or similar objects and on online sensory feedback. However, little is known about neural mechanisms underlying digit force planning. We addressed this question by quantifying the temporal evolution of corticospinal excitability (CSE) using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during two reach-to-grasp tasks. These tasks differed in terms of the magnitude of force exerted on the same points on the object to isolate digit force planning from reach and grasp planning. We also addressed the role of intracortical circuitry within primary motor cortex (M1) by quantifying the balance between short intracortical inhibition and facilitation using paired-pulse TMS on the same tasks. Eighteen right-handed subjects were visually cued to plan digit placement at predetermined locations on the object and subsequently to exert either negligible force (“low-force” task, LF) or 10% of their maximum pinch force (“high-force” task, HF) on the object. We found that the HF task elicited significantly smaller CSE than the LF task, but only when the TMS pulse coincided with the signal to initiate the reach. This force planning-related CSE modulation was specific to the muscles involved in the performance of both tasks. Interestingly, digit force planning did not result in modulation of M1 intracortical inhibitory and facilitatory circuitry. Our findings suggest that planning of digit forces reflected by CSE modulation starts well before object contact and appears to be driven by inputs from frontoparietal areas other than M1.

Interhemispheric Inhibition in Distal and Proximal Arm Representations in the Primary Motor Cortex

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 2511-2515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle L. Harris-Love ◽  
Monica A. Perez ◽  
Robert Chen ◽  
Leonardo G. Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Biceps Brachii ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Triceps Brachii ◽  
Functional Movement ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Inhibitory Interactions

Interhemispheric inhibitory interactions (IHI) operate between homologous distal hand representations in primary motor cortex (M1). It is not known whether proximal arm representations exhibit comparable effects on their homologous counterparts. We studied IHI in different arm representations, targeting triceps brachii (TB, n = 13), first dorsal interosseous (FDI, n = 13), and biceps brachii (BB, n = 7) muscles in healthy volunteers. Transcranial magnetic stimulation test stimuli (TS) were delivered to M1 contralateral to the target muscle preceded 10 ms by a conditioning stimulus (CS) to the opposite M1 at 110–150% resting motor threshold (RMT). IHI was calculated as the ratio between motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes in conditioned relative to unconditioned trials. Mean RMTs were 38.9, 46.9, and 46.0% of stimulator output in FDI, TB, and BB muscles, respectively. IHI was 0.45 ± 0.41 (FDI), 0.78 ± 0.38 (TB), and 0.52 ± 0.32 (BB, P < 0.01) when test MEP amplitudes were matched and 0.28 ± 0.17 (FDI) and 0.85 ± 0.31 (TB, P < 0.05) when TS intensities expressed as percentage RMT were matched. Significant IHI ( P < 0.05) was identified with minimal CS intensities (expressed as percentage stimulator output) in the 30 s for FDI, 60 s for TB, and 40 s for BB. Additionally, a CS of roughly 120% RMT suppressed the test MEP but not a test H-reflex in BB, suggesting IHI observed in BB is likely mediated by a supraspinal mechanism. We conclude that IHI differs between different arm muscle representations, comparable between BB and FDI but lesser for TB. This finding suggests the amount of IHI between different arm representations does not strictly follow a proximal-to-distal gradient, but may be related to the role of each muscle in functional movement synergies.

Corticomotor plasticity and learning of a ballistic thumb training task are diminished in older adults

2009 ◽  
Vol 107 (6) ◽  
pp. 1874-1883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel C. Rogasch ◽  
Tamara J. Dartnall ◽  
John Cirillo ◽  
Michael A. Nordstrom ◽  
John G. Semmler
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Training Task ◽  
Abductor Pollicis Brevis ◽  
Corticomotor Excitability ◽  
Old Adults ◽  
Young Subjects

This study examined changes in corticomotor excitability and plasticity after a thumb abduction training task in young and old adults. Electromyographic (EMG) recordings were obtained from right abductor pollicis brevis (APB, target muscle) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM, control muscle) in 14 young (18–24 yr) and 14 old (61–82 yr) adults. The training task consisted of 300 ballistic abductions of the right thumb to maximize peak thumb abduction acceleration (TAAcc). Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the left primary motor cortex was used to assess changes in APB and ADM motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) before, immediately after, and 30 min after training. No differences in corticomotor excitability (resting and active TMS thresholds, MEP input-output curves) or SICI were observed in young and old adults before training. Motor training resulted in improvements in peak TAAcc in young (177% improvement, P < 0.001) and old (124%, P = 0.005) subjects, with greater improvements in young subjects ( P = 0.002). Different thumb kinematics were observed during task performance, with increases in APB EMG related to improvements in peak TAAcc in young ( r2 = 0.46, P = 0.008) but not old ( r2 = 0.09, P = 0.3) adults. After training, APB MEPs were 50% larger ( P < 0.001 compared with before) in young subjects, with no change after training in old subjects ( P = 0.49), suggesting reduced use-dependent corticomotor plasticity with advancing age. These changes were specific to APB, because no training-related change in MEP amplitude was observed in ADM. No significant association was observed between change in APB MEP and improvement in TAAcc with training in individual young and old subjects. SICI remained unchanged after training in both groups, suggesting that it was not responsible for the diminished use-dependent corticomotor plasticity for this task in older adults.

scholarly journals Changes in corticospinal excitability associated with motor learning by observing

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather R. McGregor ◽  
Michael Vesia ◽  
Cricia Rinchon ◽  
Robert Chen ◽  
Paul L. Gribble
Keyword(s):  
Motor Learning ◽  
Motor Skills ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Abductor Pollicis Brevis ◽  
Functional Changes ◽  
Hand Muscles ◽  
Before And After

AbstractWhile many of our motor skills are acquired through physical practice, we can also learn how to make movements by observing others. For example, individuals can learn how to reach in novel dynamical environments (‘force fields’, FF) by observing the movements of a tutor. Previous neurophysiology and neuroimaging studies in humans suggest a role for the motor system in motor learning by observing. Here we tested the role of primary motor cortex (M1) in motor learning by observing. We used single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in right hand muscles at rest. MEPs were elicited before and after participants observed either a video adapting her reaches to a FF or a control video showing a tutor performing reaches in an unlearnable FF. We predicted that observing motor learning would increase M1 excitability to a greater extent than observing movements that did not involve learning. We found that observing FF learning increased MEP amplitudes recorded from right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and right abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscles. There were no changes in MEP amplitudes for control participants who observed a tutor performing reaches in an unlearnable, randomly varying FF. The observed MEP changes can thus be specifically linked to observing motor learning. These results are consistent with the idea that observing motor learning produces functional changes in M1, or corticospinal networks or both.

scholarly journals Challenging the function of motor inhibition: Does it really assist action selection?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Quoilin ◽  
Fanny Fievez ◽  
Julie Duque
Keyword(s):  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Index Finger ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Action Selection ◽  
Prime Mover ◽  
Strong Suppression ◽  
Action Preparation ◽  
Contralateral Hand ◽  
Simple Rt

By applying transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) to elicit motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in muscles of the contralateral hand during reaction time (RT) tasks, many studies have reported a strong suppression of MEPs during action preparation, a phenomenon called preparatory inhibition. Several hypotheses have been put forward regarding the role of this inhibition, with the predominant view suggesting that it would help action selection. However, this assumption is still a matter of debate. Here, we aimed at directly addressing this idea by comparing MEPs in a task that required subjects to select a finger response within a set of predefined options (choice RT task: left or right index finger abduction) or when subjects simply had to provide the same finger response on every trial, in the absence of choice (simple RT task). Moreover, we minimized any effect that could be associated with other forms of inhibition. In both versions of the task, TMS was applied on both M1 (double-coil protocol) at several time points between the go signal and the left or right index finger response, eliciting MEPs bilaterally in the prime mover (index finger agonist) and in an irrelevant muscle (pinky agonist). Overall, MEP suppression was moderate in this study; it was only found for the irrelevant muscle. As such, MEPs in the index agonist were facilitated when elicited in a responding hand (e.g. left MEPs preceding left responses) and remained mostly unchanged in a non-responding hand (e.g. left MEPs preceding right responses). In contrast, MEPs were almost always suppressed in the pinky muscle when elicited in the non-responding hand and sometimes also in the responding hand. Importantly, this effect was more consistent in the choice than in the simple RT task, supporting the view that preparatory inhibition may assist action selection. Moreover, the fact that it sometimes concerned the responding hand is coherent with the idea of a global process, suppressing broadly the motor system.

Reduced Muscle Selectivity During Individuated Finger Movements in Humans After Damage to the Motor Cortex or Corticospinal Tract

2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 1722-1733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine E. Lang ◽  
Marc H. Schieber
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Corticospinal Tract ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Descending Pathways ◽  
Finger Movements ◽  
Abductor Pollicis Brevis ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Pure Motor

We investigated how damage to the motor cortex or corticospinal tract affects the selective activation of finger muscles in humans. We hypothesized that damage relatively restricted to the motor cortex or corticospinal tract would result in unselective muscle activations during an individuated finger movement task. People with pure motor hemiparesis attributed to ischemic cerebrovascular accident were tested. Pure motor hemiparetic and control subjects were studied making flexion/extension and then abduction/adduction finger movements. During the abduction/adduction movements, we recorded muscle activity from 3 intrinsic finger muscles: the abductor pollicis brevis, the first dorsal interosseus, and the abductor digit quinti. Each of these muscles acts as an agonist for only one of the abduction/adduction movements and might therefore be expected to be active in a highly selective manner. Motor cortex or corticospinal tract damage in people with pure motor hemiparesis reduced the selectivity of finger muscle activation during individuated abduction/adduction finger movements, resulting in reduced independence of these movements. Abduction/adduction movements showed a nonsignificant trend toward being less independent than flexion/extension movements in the affected hands of hemiparetic subjects. These changes in the selectivity of muscle activation and the consequent decrease in individuation of movement were correlated with decreased hand function. Our findings imply that, in humans, spared cerebral motor areas and descending pathways that remain might activate finger muscles, but cannot fully compensate for the highly selective control provided by the primary motor cortex and the crossed corticospinal system.

scholarly journals Neurophysiological correlates of aging-related muscle weakness

2013 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2563-2573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ela B. Plow ◽  
David A. Cunningham ◽  
Corin Bonnett ◽  
Dina Gohar ◽  
Mehmed Bayram ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Muscle Weakness ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Biceps Brachii ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
Voluntary Activation ◽  
Interhemispheric Inhibition

Muscle weakness associated with aging implicates central neural degeneration. However, role of the primary motor cortex (M1) is poorly understood, despite evidence that gains in strength in younger adults are associated with its adaptations. We investigated whether weakness of biceps brachii in aging analogously relates to processes in M1. We enrolled 20 young (22.6 ± 0.87 yr) and 28 old (74.79 ± 1.37 yr) right-handed participants. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation, representation of biceps in M1 was identified. We examined the effect of age and sex on strength of left elbow flexion, voluntary activation of biceps, corticospinal excitability and output, and short-interval intracortical and interhemispheric inhibition. Interhemispheric inhibition was significantly exaggerated in the old ( P = 0.047), while strength tended to be lower ( P = 0.075). Overall, women were weaker ( P < 0.001). Processes of M1 related to strength or voluntary activation of biceps, but only in older adults. Corticospinal excitability was lower in weaker individuals ( r = 0.38), and corticospinal output, intracortical inhibition and interhemispheric inhibition were reduced too in individuals who poorly activated biceps ( r = 0.43, 0.54 and 0.38). Lower intracortical inhibition may reflect compensation for reduced corticospinal excitability, allowing weaker older adults to spread activity in M1 to recruit synergists and attempt to sustain motor output. Exaggerated interhemispheric inhibition, however, conflicts with previous evidence, potentially related to greater callosal damage in our older sample, our choice of proximal vs. distal muscle and differing influence of measurement of inhibition in rest vs. active states of muscle. Overall, age-specific relation of M1 to strength and muscle activation emphasizes that its adaptations only emerge when necessitated, as in a weakening neuromuscular system in aging.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document