Interhemispheric Inhibition in Distal and Proximal Arm Representations in the Primary Motor Cortex

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 2511-2515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle L. Harris-Love ◽  
Monica A. Perez ◽  
Robert Chen ◽  
Leonardo G. Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Biceps Brachii ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Triceps Brachii ◽  
Functional Movement ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Inhibitory Interactions

Interhemispheric inhibitory interactions (IHI) operate between homologous distal hand representations in primary motor cortex (M1). It is not known whether proximal arm representations exhibit comparable effects on their homologous counterparts. We studied IHI in different arm representations, targeting triceps brachii (TB, n = 13), first dorsal interosseous (FDI, n = 13), and biceps brachii (BB, n = 7) muscles in healthy volunteers. Transcranial magnetic stimulation test stimuli (TS) were delivered to M1 contralateral to the target muscle preceded 10 ms by a conditioning stimulus (CS) to the opposite M1 at 110–150% resting motor threshold (RMT). IHI was calculated as the ratio between motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes in conditioned relative to unconditioned trials. Mean RMTs were 38.9, 46.9, and 46.0% of stimulator output in FDI, TB, and BB muscles, respectively. IHI was 0.45 ± 0.41 (FDI), 0.78 ± 0.38 (TB), and 0.52 ± 0.32 (BB, P < 0.01) when test MEP amplitudes were matched and 0.28 ± 0.17 (FDI) and 0.85 ± 0.31 (TB, P < 0.05) when TS intensities expressed as percentage RMT were matched. Significant IHI ( P < 0.05) was identified with minimal CS intensities (expressed as percentage stimulator output) in the 30 s for FDI, 60 s for TB, and 40 s for BB. Additionally, a CS of roughly 120% RMT suppressed the test MEP but not a test H-reflex in BB, suggesting IHI observed in BB is likely mediated by a supraspinal mechanism. We conclude that IHI differs between different arm muscle representations, comparable between BB and FDI but lesser for TB. This finding suggests the amount of IHI between different arm representations does not strictly follow a proximal-to-distal gradient, but may be related to the role of each muscle in functional movement synergies.

scholarly journals Demand on skillfulness modulates interhemispheric inhibition of motor cortices

2016 ◽  
Vol 115 (6) ◽  
pp. 2803-2813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miles Wischnewski ◽  
Greg M. Kowalski ◽  
Farrah Rink ◽  
Samir R. Belagaje ◽  
Marc W. Haut ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Task ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Small Targets ◽  
Healthy Participants

The role of primary motor cortex (M1) in the control of hand movements is still unclear. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of unimanual performance reported a relationship between level of precision of a motor task and additional ipsilateral M1 (iM1) activation. In the present study, we determined whether the demand on accuracy of a movement influences the magnitude of the inhibitory effect between primary motor cortices (IHI). We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to measure active IHI (aIHI) of the iM1 on the contralateral M1 (cM1) in the premovement period of a left-hand motor task. Ten healthy participants manipulated a joystick to point to targets of two different sizes. For aIHI, the conditioning stimulus (CS) was applied to iM1, and the test stimulus (TS) to cM1, with an interstimulus interval of 10 ms. The amount of the inhibitory effect of the CS on the motor-evoked potential (MEP) of the subsequent TS was expressed as percentage of the mean MEP amplitude evoked by the single TS. Across different time points of aIHI measurements in the premovement period, there was a significant effect for target size on aIHI. Preparing to point to small targets was associated with weaker aIHI compared with pointing to large targets. The present findings suggest that, during the premovement period, aIHI from iM1 on cM1 is modulated by the demand on accuracy of the motor task. This is consistent with task fMRI findings showing bilateral M1 activation during high-precision movements but only unilateral M1 activity during low-precision movements.

scholarly journals Chronic low-frequency rTMS of primary motor cortex diminishes exercise training-induced gains in maximal voluntary force in humans

2009 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tibor Hortobágyi ◽  
Sarah Pirio Richardson ◽  
Mikhael Lomarev ◽  
Ejaz Shamim ◽  
Sabine Meunier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Compound Action Potential ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Maximal Voluntary Force ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold

Although there is consensus that the central nervous system mediates the increases in maximal voluntary force (maximal voluntary contraction, MVC) produced by resistance exercise, the involvement of the primary motor cortex (M1) in these processes remains controversial. We hypothesized that 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of M1 during resistance training would diminish strength gains. Forty subjects were divided equally into five groups. Subjects voluntarily (Vol) abducted the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) (5 bouts × 10 repetitions, 10 sessions, 4 wk) at 70–80% MVC. Another group also exercised but in the 1-min-long interbout rest intervals they received rTMS [Vol+rTMS, 1 Hz, FDI motor area, 300 pulses/session, 120% of the resting motor threshold (rMT)]. The third group also exercised and received sham rTMS (Vol+Sham). The fourth group received only rTMS (rTMS_only). The 37.5% and 33.3% gains in MVC in Vol and Vol+Sham groups, respectively, were greater ( P = 0.001) than the 18.9% gain in Vol+rTMS, 1.9% in rTMS_only, and 2.6% in unexercised control subjects who received no stimulation. Acutely, within sessions 5 and 10, single-pulse TMS revealed that motor-evoked potential size and recruitment curve slopes were reduced in Vol+rTMS and rTMS_only groups and accumulated to chronic reductions by session 10. There were no changes in rMT, maximum compound action potential amplitude (Mmax), and peripherally evoked twitch forces in the trained FDI and the untrained abductor digiti minimi. Although contributions from spinal sources cannot be excluded, the data suggest that M1 may play a role in mediating neural adaptations to strength training.

scholarly journals Neuroplasticity Changes on Human Motor Cortex Induced by Acupuncture Therapy: A Preliminary Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Yang ◽  
Ines Eisner ◽  
Siqi Chen ◽  
Shaosong Wang ◽  
Fan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Acupuncture Therapy ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Interhemispheric Inhibition ◽  
Human Motor Cortex ◽  
Interhemispheric Competition ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold

While neuroplasticity changes measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation have been proved to be highly correlated to motor recovery and have been tested in various forms of interventions, it has not been applied to investigate the neurophysiologic mechanism of acupuncture therapy. The aim of this study is to investigate neuroplasticity changes induced by a single session of acupuncture therapy in healthy adults, regarding the excitability change on bilateral primary motor cortex and interhemispheric inhibition. Ten subjects took a 30-minute acupuncture therapy and the same length relaxing phase in separate days. Transcranial magnetic stimulation measures, including resting motor threshold, amplitudes of motor-evoked potential, and interhemispheric inhibition, were assessed before and 10 minutes after intervention. Acupuncture treatment showed significant changes on potential amplitude from both ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres to acupuncture compared to baseline. Also, interhemispheric inhibition from the contralateral motor cortex to the opposite showed a significant decline. The results indicated that corticomotoneuronal excitability and interhemispheric competition could be modulated by acupuncture therapy on healthy subjects. The following question about whether these changes will be observed in the same way on stroke patients and whether they correlate with the therapeutic effect on movement need to be answered by following studies. This trial is registered with ISRCTN13074245.

Changes in interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine-motor manipulation task

2012 ◽  
Vol 107 (11) ◽  
pp. 3086-3094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Morishita ◽  
Kazumasa Uehara ◽  
Kozo Funase
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
Fine Motor ◽  
Interhemispheric Inhibition ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Inhibitory Circuit ◽  
Task Conditions

The effect of performance of a sensorimotor task on the interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) induced from the active primary motor cortex (M1) to the resting M1 was examined in 10 right-handed subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was performed to produce motor evoked potentials (MEP) in the resting right (Rt)-first dorsal interosseous (FDI). For the paired-TMS paradigm, a conditioning stimulus (CS) was delivered to the Rt-M1, and its intensity was adjusted from 0.6 to 1.4 times the resting motor threshold of the MEP in the left (Lt)-FDI in 0.2 steps. The test stimulus was delivered to the Lt-M1, and its intensity was adjusted to evoke similar MEP amplitudes in the Rt-FDI among the task conditions. The interstimulus interval was fixed at 10 ms. As a sensorimotor task, a fine-motor manipulation (FM) task (using chopsticks to pick up, transport, and release glass balls) was adopted. In addition, an isometric abduction (IA) task was also performed as a control task. These tasks were carried out with the left hand. The IHI from the active to the resting M1 observed during the FM task was markedly increased compared with that induced during the IA task, and this effect was not dependent on the MEP amplitude evoked in the active Lt-FDI by the CS. The present findings suggest that the increased IHI from the active to the resting M1 observed during the FM task was linked to reductions in the activity of the ipsilateral intracortical inhibitory circuit, as we reported previously.

scholarly journals Using Dual-Site Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Probe Connectivity between the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Ipsilateral Primary Motor Cortex in Humans

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt J.N. Brown ◽  
Elana R. Goldenkoff ◽  
Robert Chen ◽  
Carolyn Gunraj ◽  
Michael Vesia
Keyword(s):  
Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Dorsolateral Prefrontal ◽  
Dual Site

Dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation to the primary motor cortex (M1) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) can be used to probe functional connectivity between these regions. The purpose of this study was to characterize the effect of DLPFC stimulation on ipsilateral M1 excitability while participants were at rest and contracting the left- and right-hand first dorsal interosseous muscle. Twelve participants were tested in two separate sessions at varying inter-stimulus intervals (ISI: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, and 20 ms) at two different conditioning stimulus intensities (80% and 120% of resting motor threshold). No significant effect on ipsilateral M1 excitability was found when applying a conditioning stimulus over DLPFC at any specific inter-stimulus interval or intensity in either the left or right hemisphere. Our findings suggest neither causal inhibitory nor faciliatory influences of DLPFC on ipsilateral M1 activity while participants were at rest or when performing an isometric contraction in the target hand muscle.

scholarly journals Modulation of transcallosal inhibition by bilateral activation of agonist and antagonist proximal arm muscles

2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 405-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica A. Perez ◽  
Jane E. Butler ◽  
Janet L. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Behavior ◽  
Biceps Brachii ◽  
Silent Period ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Triceps Brachii ◽  
Transcallosal Inhibition ◽  
Flexion Extension

Transcallosal inhibitory interactions between proximal representations in the primary motor cortex remain poorly understood. In this study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation to examine the ipsilateral silent period (iSP; a measure of transcallosal inhibition) in the biceps and triceps brachii during unilateral and bilateral isometric voluntary contractions. Healthy volunteers performed 10% of maximal isometric voluntary elbow flexion or extension with one arm while the contralateral arm remained at rest or performed 30% of maximal isometric voluntary elbow flexion or extension. The iSP was measured in the arm performing 10% contractions, and electromyographic (EMG) recordings were comparable across conditions. The iSP onset and duration in the biceps and triceps brachii were comparable. In both muscles, the iSP depth and area were increased during bilateral contractions of homologous agonist muscles (extension-extension and flexion-flexion) compared with a unilateral contraction, whereas during bilateral contractions of nonhomologous antagonist muscles (extension-flexion and flexion-extension), the iSP depth and area were decreased compared with a unilateral contraction, and sometimes facilitation of EMG was seen. This effect was never observed during bilateral activation of homologous muscles. The size of responses evoked by cervicomedullary electrical stimulation in the arm that made 10% contractions remained unchanged across conditions. Thus transcallosal inhibition targeting triceps and biceps brachii is upregulated by voluntary contraction of the contralateral agonist muscle and downregulated by voluntary contraction of the contralateral antagonist muscle. We speculate that these reciprocal task-dependent interactions between bilateral flexor and extensor arm regions of the motor cortex may contribute to coupling between the arms during motor behavior.

Intracortical Inhibition and Facilitation in Different Representations of the Human Motor Cortex

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 2870-2881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Chen ◽  
Alda Tam ◽  
Cathrin Bütefisch ◽  
Brian Corwell ◽  
Ulf Ziemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Biceps Brachii ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Abductor Hallucis ◽  
Human Motor Cortex ◽  
Human Motor ◽  
Motor Representations ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition And Facilitation

Chen, Robert, Alda Tam, Cathrin Bütefisch, Brian Corwell, Ulf Ziemann, John C. Rothwell, and Leonardo G. Cohen. Intracortical inhibition and facilitation in different representations of the human motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 2870–2881, 1998. Intracortical inhibition (ICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) of the human motor cortex can be studied with paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Plastic changes and some neurological disorders in humans are associated with changes in ICI and ICF. Although well characterized in the hand representation, it is not known if ICI and ICF vary across different body part representations. Therefore we studied ICI and ICF in different motor representations of the human motor cortex. The target muscles were rectus abdominus (RA), biceps brachii (BB), abductor pollicis brevis (APB), quadriceps femoris (QF), and abductor hallucis (AH). For each muscle, we measured the rest and active motor thresholds (MTs), the motor-evoked potential (MEP) stimulus-response curve (MEP recruitment), ICI, and ICF. The effects of different interstimulus intervals (ISIs) were studied with a conditioning stimulus (CS) intensity of 80% active MT. The effects of different CS intensities were studied at ISI of 2 ms for ICI and ISI of 15 ms for ICF. MT was lowest for APB, followed by BB, AH, and QF, and was highest for RA. Except for BB, MEP recruitment was generally steeper for muscles with lower MT. ICI and ICF were present in all the motor representations tested. The stimulus intensity necessary to elicit ICI was consistently lower than that required to elicit ICF, suggesting that they are mediated by separate mechanisms. Despite wide differences in MT and MEP recruitment, the absolute CS intensities (expressed as percentage of the stimulator's output) required to elicit ICI and ICF appear unrelated to MT and MEP recruitment in the different muscles tested. These findings suggest that the intracortical mechanisms for inhibition and facilitation in different motor representations are not related to the strength of corticospinal projections.

Motor cortex disinhibition in normal-pressure hydrocephalus

2012 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 453-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei V. Chistyakov ◽  
Hava Hafner ◽  
Alon Sinai ◽  
Boris Kaplan ◽  
Menashe Zaaroor
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Healthy Volunteers ◽  
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus ◽  
Close Association ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Normal Pressure ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
Conduction Time ◽  
Shunt Placement ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold

Object Previous studies have shown a close association between frontal lobe dysfunction and gait disturbance in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). A possible mechanism linking these impairments could be a modulation of corticospinal excitability. The aim of this study was 2-fold: 1) to determine whether iNPH affects corticospinal excitability; and 2) to evaluate changes in corticospinal excitability following ventricular shunt placement in relation to clinical outcome. Methods Twenty-three patients with iNPH were examined using single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation of the leg motor area before and 1 month after ventricular shunt surgery. The parameters of corticospinal excitability assessed were the resting motor threshold (rMT), motor evoked potential/M-wave area ratio, central motor conduction time, intracortical facilitation, and short intracortical inhibition (SICI). The results were compared with those obtained in 8 age-matched, healthy volunteers, 19 younger healthy volunteers, and 9 age-matched patients with peripheral neuropathy. Results Significant reduction of the SICI associated with a decrease of the rMT was observed in patients with iNPH at baseline evaluation. Ventricular shunt placement resulted in significant enhancement of the SICI and increase of the rMT in patients who markedly improved, but not in those who failed to improve. Conclusions This study demonstrates that iNPH affects corticospinal excitability, causing disinhibition of the motor cortex. Recovery of corticospinal excitability following ventricular shunt placement is correlated with clinical improvement. These findings support the view that reduced control of motor output, rather than impairment of central motor conduction, is responsible for gait disturbances in patients with iNPH.

scholarly journals Role of cutaneous and proprioceptive inputs in sensorimotor integration and plasticity occurring in the facial primary motor cortex

2020 ◽  
Vol 598 (4) ◽  
pp. 839-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanna Pilurzi ◽  
Francesca Ginatempo ◽  
Beniamina Mercante ◽  
Luigi Cattaneo ◽  
Giovanni Pavesi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Sensorimotor Integration ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Proprioceptive Inputs
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document