Defensive Movements Evoked by Air Puff in Monkeys

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 3317-3329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan F. Cooke ◽  
Michael S. A. Graziano
Keyword(s):  
Startle Response ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Initial Position ◽  
The Body ◽  
Precentral Gyrus ◽  
Cortical Areas ◽  
The Face ◽  
Ventral Intraparietal Area ◽  
Specific Reactions ◽  
Stimulation Of

Electrical stimulation of two connected cortical areas in the monkey brain, the ventral intraparietal area (VIP) in the intraparietal sulcus and the polysensory zone (PZ) in the precentral gyrus, evokes a specific set of movements. In one interpretation, these movements correspond to those typically used to defend the body from objects that are near, approaching, or touching the skin. The present study examined the movements evoked by a puff of air aimed at various locations on the face and body of fascicularis monkeys to compare them to the movements evoked by stimulation of VIP and PZ. The air-puff-evoked movements included a movement of the eyes from any initial position toward a central region and a variety of stereotyped facial, shoulder, head, and arm movements. These movements were similar to those reported on stimulation of VIP and PZ. One difference between the air-puff-evoked movements and those evoked by stimulation of VIP and PZ is that the air puff evoked an initial startle response (a bilaterally symmetric spike in muscle activity) followed by a more sustained, lateralized response, specific to the site of the air puff. In contrast, stimulation of VIP and PZ evoked mainly a sustained, lateralized response, specific to the site of the receptive fields of the stimulated neurons. We speculate that VIP and PZ may contribute to the control of defensive movements, but that they may emphasize the more spatially specific reactions that occur after startle.

Sensorimotor Integration in the Precentral Gyrus: Polysensory Neurons and Defensive Movements

2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 1648-1660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan F. Cooke ◽  
Michael S. A. Graziano
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Sensorimotor Integration ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
The Body ◽  
Auditory Stimuli ◽  
Precentral Gyrus ◽  
Defensive Reaction ◽  
Defensive Reactions ◽  
The Face ◽  
Stimulation Of

The precentral gyrus of monkeys contains a polysensory zone in which the neurons respond to tactile, visual, and sometimes auditory stimuli. The tactile receptive fields of the polysensory neurons are usually on the face, arms, or upper torso, and the visual and auditory receptive fields are usually confined to the space near the tactile receptive fields, within about 30 cm of the body. Electrical stimulation of this polysensory zone, even in anesthetized animals, evokes a specific set of movements. The movements resemble those typically used to defend the body from objects that are near, approaching, or touching the skin. In the present study, to determine whether the stimulation-evoked movements represent a normal set of defensive movements, we tested whether they include a distinctive, nonsaccadic, centering movement of the eyes that occurs during defensive reactions. We report that this centering movement of the eyes is evoked by stimulation of sites in the polysensory zone. We also recorded the activity of neurons in the polysensory zone while the monkey made defensive reactions to an air puff on the face. The neurons became active during the defensive movement, and the magnitude of this activity was correlated with the magnitude of the defensive reaction. These results support the hypothesis that the polysensory zone in the precentral gyrus contributes to the control of defensive movements. More generally, the results support the view that the precentral gyrus can control movement at the level of complex sensorimotor tasks.

Responses of neurons in and near the thalamic ventrobasal complex of the rat to stimulation of uterus, cervix, vagina, colon, and skin

1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 557-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. J. Berkley ◽  
G. Guilbaud ◽  
J. M. Benoist ◽  
M. Gautron
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Fields ◽  
The Body ◽  
Female Rats ◽  
Caudal Part ◽  
Response Characteristics ◽  
The Core ◽  
Ventrobasal Complex ◽  
Gentle Pressure ◽  
Somatic Receptive Fields ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Previous studies in the rat and other species have shown that neurons in and near the ventrobasal complex (VB) can be activated by various visceral as well as somatic stimuli. 2. This study examined the responses of 84 single neurons in and near the rostral 2/3 of VB in 19 adult female rats in estrus to mechanical stimulation of the skin (brush, pressure, noxious pinch) and 4 different visceral stimuli, as follows: distension of both uterine horns, mechanical probing of the vagina, gentle pressure against the cervix, and distension of the colon. The rats were studied while under moderate gaseous anesthesia (33% O2-67% N2O + 0.5% halothane) and paralyzed (pancuronium bromide). 3. Of 77 neurons tested with both somatic and visceral stimuli, 70 were responsive to one type and/or the other. Responses to somatic stimuli were immediate with brief afterdischarges to the pinch stimuli. In contrast, responses to visceral stimuli were delayed an average of 9 s with long afterdischarges averaging 2 min. Most viscerally responsive neurons (74%) had somatic receptive fields, often (44%) to noxious pinch. 4. Of the 70 responsive neurons, 43 (61%) responded to 1 or more of the 4 visceral stimuli, primarily with excitation. Most of these 43 neurons (71%) were responsive to uterine distension, whereas fewer responded to stimulation of the cervix (45%), vagina (29%), or colon (34%). 5. Viscerally responsive neurons were preferentially located in regions bordering or near VB. Only 6 of 22 neurons within the core of VB (27%) responded to visceral stimuli, in contrast with 37 of 48 neurons bordering or near VB (77%). 6. The six viscerally responsive neurons within VB all had somatic receptive fields located primarily on the caudal part of the body and were responsive to only one or two of the four visceral stimuli, usually the uterus. The 37 viscerally responsive neurons bordering or near VB were of 3 types. Neurons of the first type (n = 15) were scattered throughout the areas bordering VB and responded to both somatic and visceral stimuli much like VB neurons, except that they showed more visceral convergence. Neurons of the second type (n = 11) were concentrated at the rostral and dorsal borders of VB and responded only to visceral stimuli, mainly the uterus. Neurons of the third type (n = 11) were concentrated ventrally and had very complex, long-lasting and history-dependent response characteristics to both visceral and somatic stimuli.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Response properties and synaptic connections of mechanoafferent neurons in cerebral ganglion of Aplysia

1979 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 954-974 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. Rosen ◽  
K. R. Weiss ◽  
I. Kupfermann
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Cerebral Ganglion ◽  
The Body ◽  
Sensory Response ◽  
Tactile Stimuli ◽  
Dorsal Portion ◽  
Intracellular Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. The cells of two clusters of small neurons on the ventrocaudal surface of each hemicerebral ganglion of Aplysia were found to exhibit action potentials following tactile stimuli applied to the skin of the head. These neurons appear to be mechanosensory afferents since they possess axons in the nerves innervating the skin and tactile stimulation evokes spikes with no prepotentials, even when the cell bodies are sufficiently hyperpolarized to block some spikes. The mechanosensory afferents may be primary afferents since the sensory response persists after chemical synaptic transmission is blocked by bathing the ganglion and peripheral structures in seawater with a high-Mg2+ and low-Ca2+ content. 2. The mechanosensory afferents are normally silent and are insensitive to photic, thermal, and chemical stimuli. A punctate tactile stimulus applied to a circumscribed region of skin can evoke a burst of spikes. If the stimulus is maintained at a constant forces, the mechanosensory response slowly adapts over a period of seconds. Repeated brief stimuli have little or no effect on spike frequency within a burst. 3. Approximately 81% of the mechanoafferent neurons have a single ipsilateral receptive field. The fields are located on the lips, the anterior tentacles, the dorsal portion of the head, the neck, or the perioral zone. Because many cells have collateral axons in the cerebral connectives, receptive fields elsewhere on the body are a possibility. The highest receptive-field density was associated with the lips. Within each area, receptive fields vary in size and shape. Adjacent fields overlap and larger fields frequently encompass several smaller ones. The features of some fields appear invariant from one animal to the next. A loose form of topographic organization of the mechanoafferent cells was observed. For example, cells located in the medial cluster have lip receptive fields, and most cells in the posterolateral portion of the lateral clusters have tentacle receptive fields. 4. Intracellular stimulation of individual mechanoafferents evokes short and constant-latency EPSPs in putative motor neurons comprising the identified B-cell clusters of the cerebral ganglion. On the basis of several criteria, these EPSPs appear to be several criteria, these EPSPs appear to be chemically mediated and are monosynaptic. 5. Repetitive intracellular stimulation of individual mechanoafferent neurons at low rates results in a gradual decrement in the amplitude of the EPSPs evoked in B cluster neurons. EPSP amplitude can be restored following brief periods of rest, but subsequent stimulation leads to further diminution of the response. 6. A decremented response cannot be restored by strong mechanical stimulation outside the receptive field of the mechanoafferent or by electrical stimulation of the cerebral nerves or connectives...

Visceral and somatic afferent convergence onto neurons near the central canal in the sacral spinal cord of the cat

1985 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 1059-1078 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. N. Honda
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Gray Matter ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Central Canal ◽  
The Body ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Pelvic Viscera ◽  
Somatic Receptive Fields ◽  
Sacral Spinal Cord ◽  
Stimulation Of

One hundred and sixty extracellularly and intracellularly recorded unitary discharges from the sacral or caudal spinal segments of 30 anemically decerebrated cats were studied to examine the effects of somatic and visceral afferent stimulation on neurons near the central canal (CC). The recorded unitary activity was histologically verified (by dye marks or horseradish peroxidase, HRP) as having come from the gray matter surrounding the CC that approximates Rexed's lamina X. In the absence of intentional stimulation or apparent injury by the recording electrode, 62% of the units exhibited ongoing discharges. Each unit was tested for responses to the stimulation of somatic (cutaneous and subcutaneous) and visceral (bladder and colon) structures. Seventy-six (48%) of the units responded exclusively to the stimulation of somatic receptive fields, and 10 (6%) of the units were selectively responsive to stimulation of the pelvic viscera. The activity of the remaining 74 (46%) was influenced by activity in both somatic and visceral afferent fibers. Eighteen of the 160 neurons were intracellularly marked with HRP. Based on perikaryal size and dendritic extent, it was possible to divide these cells into two partially overlapping groups. One group consisted of seven neurons with small to medium-sized perikarya, dendritic arbors largely restricted to the gray matter surrounding the CC, and small, singular somatic receptive fields. The second group comprised 11 cells with medium to large-sized soma and dendrites extending out of lamina X. These larger neurons usually possessed multiple, widely distributed somatic receptive fields. The principal finding of the present study is that in the sacral spinal cord many cells near the CC receive primary afferent inputs converging from a wide range of receptor types in somatic and visceral structures. Such neurons are capable of integrating afferent information from somatic structures on both sides of the body with information originating in pelvic viscera and midline regions such as the genitals.

Localization in somatic sensory and motor areas of human cerebral cortex as determined by direct recording of evoked potentials and electrical stimulation

1979 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 476-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clinton N. Woolsey ◽  
Theodore C. Erickson ◽  
Warren E. Gilson
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Phantom Limb Pain ◽  
Motor Area ◽  
Phantom Limb ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Precentral Gyrus ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Stimulation Of

✓ This paper reports and illustrates in figurine style results obtained by electrical stimulation of the cortex in 20 patients and by recording of cortical evoked potentials (EP's) in 13 of these patients, whose surgery required wide exposure of the Rolandic or paracentral regions of the cortex. This study is unique in that cutaneous receptive fields related to specific cortical sites were defined by mechanical stimulation, as is done in animals, in contrast to electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves at fixed sites, as in scalp EP recordings. Observations were made on pre- and postcentral gyri, on the second somatic sensory-motor area, on the supplementary motor area, and on the supplementary sensory area. In two patients with phantom limb pain, the pain was elicited in one on stimulation of the postcentral arm area, and in the other on stimulation of the supplementary sensory leg area. Surgical removal of these areas had the immediate effect of abolishing the phantoms and the pain. Long-term follow-up review was not possible. In one patient with severe Parkinson's disease, stimulating currents subthreshold for the elicitation of movement resulted in disappearance of tremor and rigidity for short periods after stimulation of the precentral gyrus. The possible patterns of organization of the human pre- and postcentral areas are considered and compared with those of the chimpanzee and other primates. In patients in whom data from pre- and postcentral gyri were adequate, it appeared that the precentral face-arm boundary is situated 1 to 2 cm higher than the corresponding postcentral boundary.

External nucleus of inferior colliculus: auditory and spinal somatosensory afferents and their interactions

1978 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 837-847 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. M. Aitkin ◽  
H. Dickhaus ◽  
W. Schult ◽  
M. Zimmermann
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Colliculus ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Tactile Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
The Body ◽  
Central Nucleus ◽  
Auditory Input ◽  
Somatosensory Information ◽  
Somatic Receptive Fields ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. The discharges of 129 units were studied in the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus of 11 anesthetised and paralyzed cats. This region is known to receive fibers from auditory nuclei and the dorsal column nuclei. 2. Stimuli used were pure tone bursts, monaural or binaural, tactile stimulation of the body surface, and electrical stimulation of the dorsal columns (DC) at a low cervical level and of the contralateral and ipsilateral tibial nerves. 3. Forty-six percent of units were only influenced by one type of stimulation (26% auditory, 20% DC). Of the remaining bimodally influenced units, the majority was excited by pure tone stimuli and inhibited by DC stimulation. 4. A small proportion of the total population (18%) was excited by both DC and auditory input, and units sensitive to both tones and tactile stimulation of the skin were rare (4%). 5. Auditory tuning curves were generally very broad compared with those of units in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus. Similarly, somatic receptive fields were large and usually extended over a whole limb. 6. The majority of tone-responsive units were influenced binaurally (70%); most somatic receptive fields were located on the contralateral fore- or hindlimb (16/18). 7. The results indicate that both auditory and somatosensory information is contained in the discharges of units in the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus. 8. Speculations are made about the role of this nucleus in descending auditory input to the spinal cord and in the comparison of auditory and cutaneous information during sound-evoked coordinated body movements.

Nociceptive body representation in nucleus ventralis posterolateralis of cat thalamus

1988 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 1714-1727 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Yokota ◽  
F. Asato ◽  
N. Koyama ◽  
T. Masuda ◽  
H. Taguchi
Keyword(s):  
Body Surface ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Serial Order ◽  
The Body ◽  
Cresyl Violet ◽  
Noxious Stimulation ◽  
Lateral Part ◽  
Shell Region ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. The somatotopic organization of nociceptive-specific (NS) and wide dynamic range (WDR) units in the nucleus ventralis posterolateralis (VPL) of the ventrobasal (VB) complex was studied. Experiments were carried out on adult cats anesthetized with urethane-chloralose. The recording sites of nociceptive units were marked by the electrophoretic deposition of pontamine sky blue from the recording microelectrode, and subsequently identified histologically in cresyl-violet stained sections. 2. It was found that NS units were located in the dorsal and ventral shell regions of the caudal VPL, whereas WDR units were located in a narrow zone of the shell region, just rostral to the NS zone. 3. NS units in the dorsal shell region had receptive fields on the contralateral dorsal surface of the body, whereas NS units in the ventral shell region had their receptive fields on the ventral aspect of the contralateral integument. 4. In the dorsal shell region, the contralateral body surface was represented in an orderly sequence. Units responding to noxious stimulation of the upper-most cervical dermatome were found in the most medial part of the shell region of the VPL, whereas those responding to stimulation of successively more caudal dermatomes were located more laterally, and in serial order. Units responding to noxious stimulation of the sacral dermatomes were thus found in the most lateral part. 5. In the ventral NS zone, the pattern was distorted by disproportionately large areas devoted to the fore- and hindpaw pads. In this region, therefore, NS units with receptive fields on the fore- and hindpaw pads were intermingled with other NS units that could have receptive fields located anywhere on the ventral body surface. It should be noted, however, that the remainder of the body surface was still represented in an orderly sequence; cervical dermatomes being represented medially, with successively more caudal dermatomes being represented progressively more laterally. 6. A similar somatotopic pattern was recognized in the distribution of the low-threshold centers of the receptive fields of WDR units.

Parallel processing in rabbit first (SI) and second (SII) somatosensory cortical areas: effects of reversible inactivation by cooling of SI on responses in SII

1992 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 703-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. M. Murray ◽  
H. Q. Zhang ◽  
A. N. Kaye ◽  
T. Sinnadurai ◽  
D. H. Campbell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Species ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Activity Levels ◽  
Tactile Information ◽  
Reversible Inactivation ◽  
Cortical Areas ◽  
Tactile Stimuli ◽  
The Face ◽  
Somatosensory Cortical Areas ◽  
Hierarchical Scheme

1. Previous observations on the effect of ablation or inactivation of the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) on the responses of neurons within the second somatosensory area (SII) to tactile stimuli point to profound differences between monkeys and certain other mammals in the organization of thalamocortical systems. In the cat, for example, tactile information appears to be conveyed in parallel from the thalamus to both SI and SII, whereas, in macaque and marmoset monkeys, it is conveyed in a serial (or hierarchical) scheme from the thalamus to SI and thence to SII. The present study examined the responses of individual SII neurons during reversible, cooling-induced inactivation of SI in another nonprimate placental mammal, the rabbit, to obtain further evidence on whether the above differences might reflect a fundamental distinction between simian primates and other mammalian species. 2. When the temperature at the face of a silver cooling block over the forepaw and hindpaw regions of SI was lowered to 5–13 degrees C, the SI surface potentials evoked by brief tactile stimuli were abolished (indicative of SI inactivation), whereas SII potentials remained intact. 3. The responses of 25 SII neurons to controlled tactile stimuli (consisting of 1- to 1.5-s trains of vibration or rectangular mechanical pulses) were studied before, during, and after inactivation of SI. The effects on the spontaneous activity of a further three SII neurons that lacked identified receptive fields were also studied. 4. The response or activity levels of 26 of the 28 SII neurons examined (93%) were unaffected by SI inactivation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The processing of mechanosensory information by spiking local interneurons in the locust

1985 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 463-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Burrows
Keyword(s):  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
The Body ◽  
Direct Stimulation ◽  
Response Characteristics ◽  
Local Interneurons ◽  
Metathoracic Ganglion ◽  
Different Response ◽  
Individual Motor ◽  
Stimulation Of

The responses and receptive fields of a group of spiking local interneurons in the metathoracic ganglion of the locust were defined by making intracellular recordings from them while moving joints of a hindleg and stimulating external mechanoreceptors. Some interneurons respond both to inputs from internal mechanoreceptors (proprioceptors) at particular joints and to inputs from an array of external mechanoreceptors. The effects of both types of receptor can be excitatory or inhibitory. Other interneurons respond to proprioceptive input alone. There is a spectrum of responses. At one extreme are interneurons that respond tonically, the frequency of their spikes being determined by the angle of a particular joint. At the other extreme are interneurons that respond phasically to imposed movements of a joint in any direction. Inbetween are interneurons that respond with either a rapidly or a more slowly adapting change in the frequency of their spikes to the displacement of a joint in only one direction. Each movement of a particular joint excites or inhibits several interneurons with a range of different response characteristics. An interneuron typically receives inputs from only one joint, though some are excited by both femoral and tibial receptors. The interneurons spike during active movements of a leg elicited by direct stimulation of individual motor neurons, and during movements elicited by tactile stimulation of other parts of the body.

Corticostriatal transformations in the primate somatosensory system. Projections from physiologically mapped body-part representations

1991 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 1249-1263 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W. Flaherty ◽  
A. M. Graybiel
Keyword(s):  
Basal Ganglia ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Somatosensory System ◽  
Body Part ◽  
The Body ◽  
Saimiri Sciureus ◽  
Body Parts ◽  
Cortical Areas ◽  
Somatosensory Information ◽  
Multiple Regions

1. The basal ganglia of primates receive somatosensory input carried largely by corticostriatal fibers. To determine whether map-transformations occur in this corticostriatal system, we investigated how electrophysiologically defined regions of the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) project to the striatum in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Receptive fields in the hand, mouth, and foot representations of cortical areas 3a, 3b, and 1 were mapped by multiunit recording; and small volumes of distinguishable anterograde tracers were injected into different body-part representations in single SI areas. 2. Analysis of labeled projections established that at least four types of systematic remapping occur in the primate corticostriatal system. 1) An area of cortex representing a single body part sends fibers that diverge to innervate multiple regions in the putamen, forming branching, patchy fields that are densest in the lateral putamen. The fields do not form elongated cylindrical forms; rather, they are nearly as extended mediolaterally as they are rostrocaudally. 2) Cortical regions representing hand, mouth, and foot send globally somatotopic, nonoverlapping projections to the putamen, but regions with closely related representations (such as those of the thumb and 5th finger in area 3b) send convergent, overlapping corticostriatal projections. The overlap is fairly precise in the caudal putamen, but in the rostral putamen the densest zones of the projections do not overlap. 3) Regions representing homologous body parts in different SI cortical areas send projections that converge in the putamen. This was true of paired projections from areas 3a and 3b, and from areas 3b and 1. Thus corticostriatal inputs representing distinct somatosensory submodalities can project to the same local regions within the striatum. Convergence is not always complete, however: in the rostral putamen of two cases comparing projections from areas 3a and 1, the densest zones of the projections did not overlap. 4) All projections from SI avoid striosomes and innervate discrete zones within the matrix. 3. These experiments demonstrate that the somatosensory representations of the body are reorganized as they are projected from SI to the somatosensory sector of the primate putamen. This remapping suggests that the striatal representation of the body may be functionally distinct from that of each area of SI. The patchy projections may provide a basis for redistribution of somatosensory information to discrete output systems in the basal ganglia. Transformations in the corticostriatal system could thus be designed for modulating different movement-related programs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document