scholarly journals Vibrissa Myoclonus (Rhythmic Retractions) Driven by Resonance of Excitatory Networks in Motor Cortex

2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 1691-1698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel A. Castro-Alamancos
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Output ◽  
Intrinsic Activity ◽  
Cycle Basis ◽  
Rhythmic Motor

Rodents use rhythmic vibrissae movements to sense the environment. It is currently unclear whether intrinsic activity in the vibrissa motor cortex (vMI) is capable of driving vibrissa movements on a cycle-by-cycle basis. Disinhibition of vMI results in the occurrence of spontaneous 5- to 15-Hz synchronized oscillations. In behaving rats, this synchronous resonance of vMI is shown here to drive contralateral vibrissa movements that are phase-locked to each cycle of the oscillation. In contrast to active whisking during sensing, which consists of active protractions, the vibrissa movements produced by vMI oscillations consisted of rhythmic retractions. The results demonstrate that rhythmic motor cortex output is capable of driving vibrissa movements on a cycle-by-cycle basis. Such motor output may be primarily expressed during abnormal states such as those related to cortical myoclonous, tremors, and cortical seizures.

A modulatory role for oxygen in shaping rhythmic motor output patterns of neuronal networks

2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Clemens ◽  
Jean-Charles Massabuau ◽  
Pierre Meyrand ◽  
John Simmers
Keyword(s):  
Neuronal Networks ◽  
Motor Output ◽  
Rhythmic Motor

Effects on Muscle Activity From Microstimuli Applied to Somatosensory and Motor Cortex During Voluntary Movement in the Monkey

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 2446-2465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail L. Widener ◽  
Paul D. Cheney
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Muscle Activity ◽  
Voluntary Movement ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Large Fraction ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Motor Output ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Spike Triggered Averaging ◽  
Area 3A

Widener, Gail L. and Paul D. Cheney. Effects on muscle activity from microstimuli applied to somatosensory and motor cortex during voluntary movement in the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 2446–2465, 1997. It is well known that electrical stimulation of primary somatosensory cortex (SI) evokes movements that resemble those evoked from primary motor cortex. These findings have led to the concept that SI may possess motor capabilities paralleling those of motor cortex and speculation that SI could function as a robust relay mediating motor responses from central and peripheral inputs. The purpose of this study was to rigorously examine the motor output capabilities of SI areas with the use of the techniques of spike- and stimulus-triggered averaging of electromyographic (EMG) activity in awake monkeys. Unit recordings were obtained from primary motor cortex and SI areas 3a, 3b, 1, and 2 in three rhesus monkeys. Spike-triggered averaging was used to assess the output linkage between individual cells and motoneurons of the recorded muscles. Cells in motor cortex producing postspike facilitation (PSpF) in spike-triggered averages of rectified EMG activity were designated corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells. Motor output efficacy was also assessed by applying stimuli through the microelectrode and computing stimulus-triggered averages of rectified EMG activity. One hundred seventy-one sites in motor cortex and 68 sites in SI were characterized functionally and tested for motor output effects on muscle activity. The incidence, character, and magnitude of motor output effects from SI areas were in sharp contrast to effects from CM cell sites in primary motor cortex. Of 68 SI cells tested with spike-triggered averaging, only one area 3a cell produced significant PSpF in spike-triggered averages of EMG activity. In comparison, 20 of 171 (12%) motor cortex cells tested produced significant postspike effects. Single-pulse intracortical microstimulation produced effects at all CM cell sites in motor cortex but at only 14% of SI sites. The large fraction of SI effects that was inhibitory represented yet another marked difference between CM cell sites in motor cortex and SI sites (25% vs 93%). The fact that motor output effects from SI were frequently absent or very weak and predominantly inhibitory emphasizes the differing motor capabilities of SI compared with primary motor cortex.

scholarly journals Different contributions of primary motor cortex, reticular formation, and spinal cord to fractionated muscle activation

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 235-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boubker Zaaimi ◽  
Lauren R. Dean ◽  
Stuart N. Baker
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Reticular Formation ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Cervical Spinal Cord ◽  
Motor Output ◽  
Natural Activity ◽  
Limb Muscles

Coordinated movement requires patterned activation of muscles. In this study, we examined differences in selective activation of primate upper limb muscles by cortical and subcortical regions. Five macaque monkeys were trained to perform a reach and grasp task, and electromyogram (EMG) was recorded from 10 to 24 muscles while weak single-pulse stimuli were delivered through microelectrodes inserted in the motor cortex (M1), reticular formation (RF), or cervical spinal cord (SC). Stimulus intensity was adjusted to a level just above threshold. Stimulus-evoked effects were assessed from averages of rectified EMG. M1, RF, and SC activated 1.5 ± 0.9, 1.9 ± 0.8, and 2.5 ± 1.6 muscles per site (means ± SD); only M1 and SC differed significantly. In between recording sessions, natural muscle activity in the home cage was recorded using a miniature data logger. A novel analysis assessed how well natural activity could be reconstructed by stimulus-evoked responses. This provided two measures: normalized vector length L, reflecting how closely aligned natural and stimulus-evoked activity were, and normalized residual R, measuring the fraction of natural activity not reachable using stimulus-evoked patterns. Average values for M1, RF, and SC were L = 119.1 ± 9.6, 105.9 ± 6.2, and 109.3 ± 8.4% and R = 50.3 ± 4.9, 56.4 ± 3.5, and 51.5 ± 4.8%, respectively. RF was significantly different from M1 and SC on both measurements. RF is thus able to generate an approximation to the motor output with less activation than required by M1 and SC, but M1 and SC are more precise in reaching the exact activation pattern required. Cortical, brainstem, and spinal centers likely play distinct roles, as they cooperate to generate voluntary movements. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Brainstem reticular formation, primary motor cortex, and cervical spinal cord intermediate zone can all activate primate upper limb muscles. However, brainstem output is more efficient but less precise in producing natural patterns of motor output than motor cortex or spinal cord. We suggest that gross muscle synergies from the reticular formation are sculpted and refined by motor cortex and spinal circuits to reach the finely fractionated output characteristic of dexterous primate upper limb movements.

Moving forward: methodological considerations when assessing corticospinal excitability during rhythmic motor output in humans

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan J Lockyer ◽  
Christopher T Compton ◽  
Davis A. Forman ◽  
Gregory E. Pearcey ◽  
Duane C Button ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Control ◽  
Human Movement ◽  
Human Locomotion ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
Motor Output ◽  
Rhythmic Motor ◽  
Arm Cycling ◽  
Physiological Relevance ◽  
The Many ◽  
Methodological Considerations

The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess the excitability of the central nervous system to further understand the neural control of human movement is expansive. The majority of the work performed to-date has assessed corticospinal excitability either at rest or during relatively simple isometric contractions. The results from this work are not easily extrapolated to rhythmic, dynamic motor outputs given that corticospinal excitability is task-, phase-, intensity-, direction- and muscle-dependent (Power et al. 2018). Assessing corticospinal excitability during rhythmic motor output, however, involves technical challenges that are to be overcome, or at the minimum considered, when attempting to design experiments and interpret the physiological relevance of the results. The purpose of this narrative review is to highlight research examining corticospinal excitability during a rhythmic motor output and importantly, to provide recommendations regarding the many factors that must be considered when designing and interpreting findings from studies that involve limb movement. To do so, the majority of work described herein refers to work performed using arm cycling (arm pedaling or arm cranking) as a model of a rhythmic motor output used to examine the neural control of human locomotion.

Contributions of intrinsic motor neuron properties to the production of rhythmic motor output in the mammalian spinal cord

2000 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 649-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ole Kiehn ◽  
Ole Kjaerulff ◽  
Matthew C Tresch ◽  
Ronald M Harris-Warrick
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Motor Neuron ◽  
Motor Output ◽  
Rhythmic Motor ◽  
Intrinsic Motor

scholarly journals Task-free presurgical mapping using functional magnetic resonance imaging intrinsic activity

2009 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 746-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hesheng Liu ◽  
Randy L. Buckner ◽  
Tanveer Talukdar ◽  
Naoaki Tanaka ◽  
Joseph R. Madsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Functional Anatomy ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Cortical Stimulation ◽  
Intrinsic Activity ◽  
Motor Network ◽  
Actual Movement ◽  
Frequency Components ◽  
Function Mapping

Object Low-frequency components of the spontaneous functional MR imaging signal provide information about the intrinsic functional and anatomical organization of the brain. The ability to use such methods in individual patients may provide a powerful tool for presurgical planning. The authors explore the feasibility of presurgical motor function mapping in which a task-free paradigm is used. Methods Six surgical candidates with tumors or epileptic foci near the motor cortex participated in this study. The investigators directly compared task-elicited activation of the motor system to activation obtained from intrinsic activity correlations. The motor network within the unhealthy hemisphere was identified based on intrinsic activity correlations, allowing distortions of functional anatomy caused by the tumor and epilepsy to be directly visualized. The precision of the motor function mapping was further explored in 1 participant by using direct cortical stimulation. Results The motor regions localized based on the spontaneous activity correlations were quite similar to the regions defined by actual movement tasks and cortical stimulation. Using intrinsic activity correlations, it was possible to map the motor cortex in presurgical patients. Conclusions This task-free paradigm may provide a powerful approach to map functional anatomy in patients without task compliance and allow multiple brain systems to be determined in a single scanning session.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document