Similarity of Direction Tuning Among Responses to Stimulation of Different Whiskers in Neurons of Rat Barrel Cortex

2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 2004-2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Kida ◽  
Satoshi Shimegi ◽  
Hiromichi Sato
Keyword(s):  
Barrel Cortex ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Specific Response ◽  
Neuronal Responses ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Fast Spiking ◽  
Whisker Stimulation ◽  
Direction Tuning ◽  
Network Mechanism ◽  
Stimulation Of

Cells in the rat barrel cortex exhibit stimulus-specific response properties. To understand the network mechanism of direction selectivity in response to facial whisker deflection, we examined direction selectivity of neuronal responses to single- and multiwhisker stimulations. In the case of regular-spiking units, i.e., putative excitatory cells, direction preferences were quite similar between responses to single-whisker stimulation of the principal and adjacent whiskers. In multiwhisker stimulation at short (≤5 ms) interstimulus intervals (ISIs), response facilitation was evoked only when the whiskers were deflected to the preferred direction of the response to the single whisker stimulation. These results suggest that there are neuronal networks among cells with different whisker preferences but with a common direction preference that could be the neuronal basis of the direction-selective facilitation of the response to multiwhisker stimulation. In contrast, multiwhisker stimulation at long (≥6 ms) ISIs caused non–direction-selective suppression of the response to the second stimulus. In the case of fast-spiking units, i.e., putative inhibitory cells, poor direction selectivity was exhibited. Thus stimulus direction is represented as the direction-selective responses to the single- and multiwhisker stimulations of putative excitatory cells rather than those of putative inhibitory cells.

Olfactory modulation of barrel cortex activity during active whisking and passive whisker stimulation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Renard ◽  
Evan Harrell ◽  
Brice Bathallier
Keyword(s):  
Facial Nerve ◽  
Calcium Imaging ◽  
Tactile Stimulation ◽  
Barrel Cortex ◽  
Neuronal Responses ◽  
Population Activity ◽  
Tactile Information ◽  
Large Populations ◽  
Whisker Stimulation ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Rodents depend on olfaction and touch to meet many of their fundamental needs. The joint significance of these sensory systems is underscored by an intricate coupling between sniffing and whisking. However, the impact of simultaneous olfactory and tactile inputs on sensory representations in the cortex remains elusive. To study these interactions, we recorded large populations of barrel cortex neurons using 2-photon calcium imaging in head-fixed mice during olfactory and tactile stimulation. We find that odors alter barrel cortex activity in at least two ways, first by enhancing whisking, and second by central cross-talk that persists after whisking is abolished by facial nerve sectioning. Odors can either enhance or suppress barrel cortex neuronal responses, and while odor identity can be decoded from population activity, it does not interfere with the tactile representation. Thus, barrel cortex represents olfactory information which, in the absence of learned associations, is coded independently of tactile information.

scholarly journals Neocortical inhibitory interneuron subtypes display distinct responses to synchrony and rate of inputs

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew M. Tran ◽  
Luke Y. Prince ◽  
Dorian Gray ◽  
Lydia Saad ◽  
Helen Chasiotis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Information ◽  
Barrel Cortex ◽  
Inhibitory Interneuron ◽  
Optical Stimulation ◽  
Layer 2 ◽  
Fast Spiking ◽  
Cortical Microcircuit ◽  
Negative Controls ◽  
Mouse Lines ◽  
Stimulation Of

AbstractPopulations of neurons in the neocortex can carry information with both the synchrony and the rate of their spikes. However, it is unknown whether distinct subtypes of neurons in the cortical microcircuit are more sensitive to information carried by synchrony versus rate. Here, we address this question using patterned optical stimulation in slices of barrel cortex from transgenic mouse lines labelling distinct interneuron populations: fast-spiking parvalbumin-positive (PV+) and somatostatin-positive (SST+) interneurons. We use optical stimulation of channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) expressing excitatory neurons in layer 2/3 in order to encode a random 1-bit signal in either the synchrony or rate of activity in presynaptic cells. We then examine the mutual information between this 1-bit signal and the voltage and spiking responses in PV+ and SST+ interneurons. Generally, we find that both interneuron types carry more information than GFP negative (GFP-) control cells. More specifically, we find that for a synchrony encoding, PV+ interneurons carry more information in the first 5 milliseconds, while both interneuron subtypes carry more information than negative controls in their later response. We also find that for a rate encoding, SST+ interneurons carry more information than either PV+ or negative controls after several milliseconds. These data demonstrate that inhibitory interneuron subtypes in the neocortex have distinct responses to information carried by synchrony versus rates of spiking.

Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Neuronal Sensory Integration in the Barrel Cortex of the Rat

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 1450-1467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valérie Ego-Stengel ◽  
Tadeu Mello E Souza ◽  
Vincent Jacob ◽  
Daniel E. Shulz
Keyword(s):  
Barrel Cortex ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Spatial Arrangement ◽  
Spatiotemporal Pattern ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Response Modulation ◽  
Neuronal Responses ◽  
Rapid Sequence ◽  
Sensory Cortices ◽  
Stimulation Of

In primary sensory cortices, neuronal responses to a stimulus presented as part of a rapid sequence often differ from responses to an isolated stimulus. It has been reported that sequential stimulation of two whiskers produces facilitatory modulations of barrel cortex neuronal responses. These results are at odds with the well-known suppressive interaction that has been usually described. Herein, we have examined the dependency of response modulation on the spatiotemporal pattern of stimulation by varying the spatial arrangement of the deflected vibrissae, the temporal frequency of stimulation, and the time interval between whisker deflections. Extracellular recordings were made from primary somatosensory cortex of anesthetized rats. Two contralateral whiskers were stimulated at 0.5 and 8 Hz at intervals ranging from 0 to ±30 ms. Response interactions were assessed during stimulation of the principal and adjacent whiskers, first from the same row and second from the same arc. When tested at 0.5 Hz, 59% of single units showed a statistically significant suppressive interaction, whereas response facilitation was found in only 6% of cells. In contrast, at 8 Hz, a significant supralinear summation was observed in 19% of the cells, particularly for stimulations along an arc rather than along a row. Multi-unit recordings showed similar results. These observations indicate that most of the interactions in the barrel cortex during two-whisker stimulation are suppressive. However, facilitation can be revealed when stimuli are applied at a physiological frequency and could be the basis for internal representations of the spatiotemporal pattern of the stimulus.

scholarly journals Repeated whisker stimulation evokes invariant neuronal responses in the dorsolateral striatum of anesthetized rats: a potential correlate of sensorimotor habits

2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (5) ◽  
pp. 2225-2238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd M. Mowery ◽  
Jon B. Harrold ◽  
Kevin D. Alloway
Keyword(s):  
Barrel Cortex ◽  
Neural Mechanism ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Original Position ◽  
Induced Response ◽  
Neuronal Responses ◽  
Dorsolateral Striatum ◽  
Stimulus Response ◽  
Computer Controlled ◽  
Whisker Stimulation

The dorsolateral striatum (DLS) receives extensive projections from primary somatosensory cortex (SI), but very few studies have used somesthetic stimulation to characterize the sensory coding properties of DLS neurons. In this study, we used computer-controlled whisker deflections to characterize the extracellular responses of DLS neurons in rats lightly anesthetized with isoflurane. When multiple whiskers were synchronously deflected by rapid back-and-forth movements, whisker-sensitive neurons in the DLS responded to both directions of movement. The latency and magnitude of these neuronal responses displayed very little variation with changes in the rate (2, 5, or 8 Hz) of whisker stimulation. Simultaneous recordings in SI barrel cortex and the DLS revealed important distinctions in the neuronal responses of these serially connected brain regions. In contrast to DLS neurons, SI neurons were activated by the initial deflection of the whiskers but did not respond when the whiskers moved back to their original position. As the rate of whisker stimulation increased, SI responsiveness declined, and the latencies of the responses increased. In fact, when whiskers were deflected at 5 or 8 Hz, many neurons in the DLS responded before the SI neurons. These results and earlier anatomic findings suggest that a component of the sensory-induced response in the DLS is mediated by inputs from the thalamus. Furthermore, the lack of sensory adaptation in the DLS may represent a critical part of the neural mechanism by which the DLS encodes stimulus-response associations that trigger motor habits and other stimulus-evoked behaviors that are not contingent on rewarded outcomes.

Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque

1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 1106-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. D. Albright
Keyword(s):  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Orientation Selectivity ◽  
Orientation Tuning ◽  
Area Mt ◽  
Mt Neurons ◽  
V1 Neurons ◽  
Moving Stimuli ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Visual Area Mt ◽  
Direction Tuning

We recorded from single neurons in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of the macaque monkey and studied their direction and orientation selectivity. We also recorded from single striate cortex (V1) neurons in order to make direct comparisons with our observations in area MT. All animals were immobilized and anesthetized with nitrous oxide. Direction selectivity of 110 MT neurons was studied with three types of moving stimuli: slits, single spots, and random-dot fields. All of the MT neurons were found to be directionally selective using one or more of these stimuli. MT neurons exhibited a broad range of direction-tuning bandwidths to all stimuli (minimum = 32 degrees, maximum = 186 degrees, mean = 95 degrees). On average, responses were strongly unidirectional and of similar magnitude for all three stimulus types. Orientation selectivity of 89 MT neurons was studied with stationary flashed slits. Eighty-three percent were found to be orientation selective. Overall, orientation-tuning bandwidths were significantly narrower (mean = 64 degrees) than direction-tuning bandwidths for moving stimuli. Moreover, responses to stationary-oriented stimuli were generally smaller than those to moving stimuli. Direction selectivity of 55 V1 neurons was studied with moving slits; orientation selectivity of 52 V1 neurons was studied with stationary flashed slits. In V1, compared with MT, direction-tuning bandwidths were narrower (mean = 68 degrees). Moreover, V1 responses to moving stimuli were weaker, and bidirectional tuning was more common. The mean orientation-tuning bandwidth in V1 was also significantly narrower than that in MT (mean = 52 degrees), but the responses to stationary-oriented stimuli were of similar magnitude in the two areas. We examined the relationship between optimal direction and optimal orientation for MT neurons and found that 61% had an orientation preference nearly perpendicular to the preferred direction of motion, as is the case for all V1 neurons. However, another 29% of MT neurons had an orientation preference roughly parallel to the preferred direction. These observations, when considered together with recent reports claiming sensitivity of some MT neurons to moving visual patterns (39), suggest specific neural mechanisms underlying pattern-motion sensitivity in area MT. These results support the notion that area MT represents a further specialization over area V1 for stimulus motion processing. Furthermore, the marked similarities between direction and orientation tuning in area MT in macaque and owl monkey support the suggestion that these areas are homologues.

Modified Sensory Processing in the Barrel Cortex of the Adult Mouse After Chronic Whisker Stimulation

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 2130-2147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Quairiaux ◽  
Michael Armstrong-James ◽  
Egbert Welker
Keyword(s):  
Sensory Processing ◽  
Adult Mouse ◽  
Barrel Cortex ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Inhibitory Synapses ◽  
Neuronal Responses ◽  
Chronic Stimulation ◽  
Functional Changes ◽  
Whisker Stimulation ◽  
Sensory Responses

Chronic stimulation of a mystacial whisker follicle for 24 h induces structural and functional changes in layer IV of the corresponding barrel, with an insertion of new inhibitory synapses on spines and a depression of neuronal responses to the stimulated whisker. Under urethane anesthesia, we analyzed how sensory responses of single units are affected in layer IV and layers II & III of the stimulated barrel column as well as in adjacent columns. In the stimulated column, spatiotemporal characteristics of the activation evoked by the stimulated whisker are not altered, although spontaneous activity and response magnitude to the stimulated whisker are decreased. The sensitivity of neurons for the deflection of this whisker is not altered but the dynamic range of the response is reduced as tested by varying the amplitude and repetition rate of the deflection. Responses to deflection of nonstimulated whiskers remain unaltered with the exception of in-row whisker responses that are depressed in the column corresponding to the stimulated whisker. In adjacent nonstimulated columns, neuronal activity remains unaltered except for a diminished response of units in layer II/III to deflection of the stimulated whisker. From these results we propose that an increased inhibition within the stimulated barrel reduced the magnitude of its excitatory output and accordingly the flow of excitation toward layers II & III and the subsequent spread into adjacent columns. In addition, the period of uncorrelated activity between pathways from the stimulated and nonstimulated whiskers weakens synaptic inputs from in-row whiskers in the stimulated barrel column.

scholarly journals Fine Detail of Neurovascular Coupling Revealed by Spatiotemporal Analysis of the Hemodynamic Response to Single Whisker Stimulation in Rat Barrel Cortex

2008 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 787-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Berwick ◽  
D. Johnston ◽  
M. Jones ◽  
J. Martindale ◽  
C. Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Representation ◽  
Barrel Cortex ◽  
Spatiotemporal Analysis ◽  
Cortical Column ◽  
Spatiotemporal Resolution ◽  
Fine Detail ◽  
Whisker Stimulation ◽  
Multichannel Electrode ◽  
Neuroimaging Techniques ◽  
Stimulation Of

The spatial resolution of hemodynamic-based neuroimaging techniques, including functional magnetic resonance imaging, is limited by the degree to which neurons regulate their blood supply on a fine scale. Here we investigated the spatial detail of neurovascular events with a combination of high spatiotemporal resolution two-dimensional spectroscopic optical imaging, multichannel electrode recordings and cytochrome oxidase histology in the rodent whisker barrel field. After mechanical stimulation of a single whisker, we found two spatially distinct cortical hemodynamic responses: a transient response in the “upstream” branches of surface arteries and a later highly localized increase in blood volume centered on the activated cortical column. Although the spatial representation of this localized response exceeded that of a single “barrel,” the spread of hemodynamic activity accurately reflected the neural response in neighboring columns rather than being due to a passive “overspill.” These data confirm hemodynamics are capable of providing accurate “single-condition” maps of neural activity.

scholarly journals An elaborate sweep-stick code in rat barrel cortex

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (38) ◽  
pp. eabb7189
Author(s):  
Evan R. Harrell ◽  
Matías A. Goldin ◽  
Brice Bathellier ◽  
Daniel E. Shulz
Keyword(s):  
Angular Velocity ◽  
Barrel Cortex ◽  
Deep Layer ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Natural Conditions ◽  
Computational Framework ◽  
Stick Slip ◽  
Feature Encoding ◽  
Whisker Stimulation ◽  
Angular Displacements

In rat barrel cortex, feature encoding schemes uncovered during broadband whisker stimulation are hard to reconcile with the simple stick-slip code observed during natural tactile behaviors, and this has hindered the development of a generalized computational framework. By designing broadband artificial stimuli to sample the inputs encoded under natural conditions, we resolve this disparity while markedly increasing the percentage of deep layer neurons found to encode whisker movements, as well as the diversity of these encoded features. Deep layer neurons encode two main types of events, sticks and sweeps, corresponding to high angular velocity bumps and large angular displacements with high velocity, respectively. Neurons can exclusively encode sticks or sweeps, or they can encode both, with or without direction selectivity. Beyond unifying coding theories from naturalistic and artificial stimulation studies, these findings delineate a simple and generalizable set of whisker movement features that can support a range of perceptual processes.

scholarly journals Spontaneous activity synchronizes whisker-related sensorimotor networks prior to their maturation in the developing rat cortex

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. McVea ◽  
Timothy H. Murphy ◽  
Majid H. Mohajerani
Keyword(s):  
Barrel Cortex ◽  
Intracortical Microstimulation ◽  
Tight Coupling ◽  
Motor Systems ◽  
Medial Cortex ◽  
Whisker Stimulation ◽  
Developing Rat ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Postnatal Rats ◽  
Stimulation Of

AbstractA prominent feature of the cortical systems controlling the whiskers in the adult rodent is tight coupling between sensory and motor systems. Stimulation of the whiskers evokes activation of discrete motor regions of cortex shortly after activation of the sensory cortex. To explore the factors that direct the development of sensorimotor functional connectivity, we recorded spontaneous and whisker-evoked cortical activity using voltage-sensitive imaging over a large (7X7 mm) craniotomy in postnatal rats (day 5-12) under anesthesia. We found that spontaneous bursts of activity in the barrel cortex were correlated predominantly with activity in motor (anterio-medial) cortex, at ages before whisker stimulation evoked activation in this area. Intracortical microstimulation and anatomical tracing experiments confirmed there were no functional or anatomical intracortical sensorimotor connections. We interpret these results as evidence that the spontaneous patterns of activity in the cortex synchronize functionally related regions of the brain prior to their maturation.Author ContributionsD.A.M, T.H.M., and M.H.M. designed the study. D.A.M, and M.H.M performed the experiments and analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript, which all authors commented on and edited. T.H.M. and M.H.M. supervised the study.

Neuronal responses to edges defined by luminance vs. temporal texture in macaque area V1

1997 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 949-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avi Chaudhuri ◽  
Thomas D. Albright
Keyword(s):  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Image Features ◽  
Orientation Selectivity ◽  
Close Correspondence ◽  
Neuronal Responses ◽  
V1 Neurons ◽  
Texture Contrast ◽  
Direction Tuning ◽  
Made In

AbstractWe examined the responsivity, orientation selectivity, and direction selectivity of a sample of neurons in cortical area V1 of the macaque using visual stimuli consisting of drifting oriented contours defined by each of two very different figural cues: luminance contrast and temporal texture. Comparisons of orientation and direction tuning elicited by the different cues were made in order to test the hypothesis that the neuronal representations of these parameters are form-cue invariant. The majority of the sampled cells responded to both stimulus types, although responses to temporal texture stimuli were generally weaker than those elicited by luminance-defined stimuli. Of those units exhibiting orientation selectivity when tested with the luminance-defined stimuli, more than half were also selective for the orientation of the temporal texture stimuli. There was close correspondence between the preferred orientations and tuning bandwidths revealed with the two stimulus types. Of those units exhibiting directional selectivity when tested with the luminance-defined stimuli, about two-thirds were also selective for the direction of the temporal texture stimuli. There was close correspondence between the preferred directions revealed with the two stimulus types, although bidirectional responses were somewhat more common when temporal texture stimuli were used. These results indicate that many V1 neurons encode orientation and direction of motion of retinal image features in a manner that is largely independent of whether the feature is defined by luminance or temporal texture contrast. These neurons may contribute to perceptual phenomena in which figural cue identity is disregarded.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document