scholarly journals Responses of vestibular nucleus neurons to inputs from the hindlimb are enhanced following a bilateral labyrinthectomy

2013 ◽  
Vol 114 (6) ◽  
pp. 742-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew A. McCall ◽  
Jennifer D. Moy ◽  
Sonya R. Puterbaugh ◽  
William M. DeMayo ◽  
Bill J. Yates
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Vestibular Nucleus ◽  
Muscle Spindles ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Loss ◽  
Median Response ◽  
Golgi Tendon Organs ◽  
Bilateral Vestibular Loss ◽  
Median Response Latency ◽  
Stimulation Of

Vestibular nucleus neurons have been shown to respond to stimulation of afferents innervating the limbs. However, a limitation in the potential translation of these findings is that they were obtained from decerebrate or anesthetized animals. The goal of the present study was to determine whether stimulation of hindlimb nerves similarly affects vestibular nucleus neuronal activity in conscious cats, and whether the responsiveness of neurons to the stimuli is altered following a bilateral labyrinthectomy. In labyrinth-intact animals, the firing rate of 24/59 (41%) of the neurons in the caudal vestibular nucleus complex was affected by hindlimb nerve stimulation. Most responses were excitatory; the median response latency was 20 ms, but some units had response latencies as short as 10 ms. In the first week after a bilateral labyrinthectomy, the proportion of vestibular nucleus neurons that responded to hindlimb nerve stimulation increased slightly (to 24/55 or 44% of units). However, during the subsequent postlabyrinthectomy survival period, the proportion of vestibular nucleus neurons with hindlimb inputs increased significantly (to 30/49 or 61% of units). Stimuli to hindlimb nerves needed to elicit neuronal responses was consistently over three times the threshold for eliciting an afferent volley. These data show that inputs from hindlimb afferents smaller than those innervating muscle spindles and Golgi tendon organs affect the processing of information in the vestibular nuclei, and that these inputs are enhanced following a bilateral labyrinthectomy. These findings have implications for the development of a limb neuroprosthetics device for the management of bilateral vestibular loss.

scholarly journals Chronic Electrical Stimulation of the Otolith Organ: Preliminary Results in Humans with Bilateral Vestibulopathy and Sensorineural Hearing Loss

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (Suppl. 1-2) ◽  
pp. 79-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angel Ramos Macias ◽  
Angel Ramos de Miguel ◽  
Isaura Rodriguez Montesdeoca ◽  
Silvia Borkoski Barreiro ◽  
Juan Carlos Falcón González
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Clinical Test ◽  
Otolith Organ ◽  
Bilateral Vestibulopathy ◽  
Vestibular Loss ◽  
Bilateral Vestibular Loss ◽  
Chronic Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

Introduction: Bilateral vestibulopathy is an important cause of imbalance that is misdiagnosed. The clinical management of patients with bilateral vestibular loss remains difficult as there is no clear evidence for an effective treatment. In this paper, we try to analyze the effect of chronic electrical stimulation and adaptation to electrical stimulation of the vestibular system in humans when stimulating the otolith organ with a constant pulse train to mitigate imbalance due to bilateral vestibular dysfunction (BVD). Methods: We included 2 patients in our study with BVD according to Criteria Consensus of the Classification Committee of the Bárány Society. Both cases were implanted by using a full-band straight electrode to stimulate the otoliths organs and simultaneously for the cochlear stimulation we use a perimodiolar electrode. Results: In both cases Vestibular and clinical test (video head impulse test, videonistagmography cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, cVEMP and oVEMP), subjective visual vertical test, computerized dynamic posturography, dynamic gait index, Time UP and Go test and dizziness handicap index) were performed. Posture and gait metrics reveal important improvement if compare with preoperartive situation. Oscillopsia, unsteadiness, independence and quality of life improved to almost normal situation. Discussion/Conclusion: Prosthetic implantation of the otolith organ in humans is technically feasible. Electrical stimulation might have potential effects on balance and this is stable after 1 year follow-up. This research provides new possibilities for the development of vestibular implants to improve gravito-inertial acceleration sensation, in this case by the otoliths stimulation.

Properties of projections from vestibular nuclei to medial reticular formation in the cat

1975 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1421-1435 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. W. Peterson ◽  
C. Abzug
Keyword(s):  
Reticular Formation ◽  
Central Region ◽  
Vestibular Nucleus ◽  
Extracellular Recording ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Medullary Reticular Formation ◽  
Pentobarbital Anesthesia ◽  
Antidromic Responses ◽  
Series Of Experiments ◽  
Stimulation Of

In one series of experiments, vestibular neurons that could be activated antidromically by stimulation of the contralateral medial reticular formation were studied with extracellular recording in cats under pentobarbital anesthesia. These neurons were found in all of the four main vestibular nuclei, but were less prevalent in dorsal Deiters' nucleus and in the central region of the superior vestibular nucleus than elsewhere. Regions of the pontine and medullary reticular formation from which neurons in different vestibular nuclei were activated corresponded to the pattern of vestibuloreticular projections described by neuroanatomists. 2. Latencies of antidromic responses to stimulation of the contralateral reticular formation ranged from 0.6 to over 3 ms, indicating a relatively slow transfer of activity from vestibular nuclei to reticular formation.

Monosynaptic and disynaptic connections in the utriculo-ocular reflex arc of the cat

1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 950-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Uchino ◽  
H. Ikegami ◽  
M. Sasaki ◽  
K. Endo ◽  
M. Imagawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Facial Nerve ◽  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Visual Observation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Bipolar Electrodes ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Reflex Arc ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Connections from the utricular (UT) nerve to motoneurons and interneurons in the ipsilateral abducens (AB) nucleus were studied in anesthetized and decerebrated cats. Bipolar electrodes were fixed on the left UT nerve under visual observation. The other branches of the vestibular nerve and the facial nerve were transected in the left inner ear. 2. Stimulation of the UT nerve evoked a small positive-negative (P/N) deflection and a negative (N1) potential in the vestibular nuclei, with mean latencies of 0.56 and 0.84 ms, respectively. In the AB nucleus a small P/N deflection with a mean latency of 0.72 ms was recorded, which was considered as a incoming volley of the UT nerve. 3. Excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) were recorded from AB motoneurons with short latencies after UT nerve stimulation. They were classified into two types, M and D. M-type EPSPs, which followed repetitive high-frequency stimuli and were recorded from the majority of AB motoneurons, had latencies ranging from 0.9 to 1.2 ms. Double shocks to the UT nerve evoked EPSPs that had the same latency. It was suggested that the AB motoneurons had monosynaptic connections with the UT nerve. D-type EPSPs, which were recorded from most of the AB motoneurons, had slightly longer latencies ranging from 1.2 to 1.8 ms. They showed temporal facilitation when double shocks were provided to the UT nerve. They did not follow repetitive high-frequency stimuli (< or = 2.5-ms interval). It was suggested that D-type EPSPs were di-synaptically evoked via secondary vestibular neurons. Interneurons in the AB nucleus had the same characteristics as AB motoneurons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Floccular Modulation of Vestibuloocular Pathways and Cerebellum-Related Plasticity: An In Vitro Whole Brain Study

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 2514-2528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander L. Babalian ◽  
Pierre-Paul Vidal
Keyword(s):  
Purkinje Cells ◽  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Inferior Olive ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Nerve ◽  
Abducens Nucleus ◽  
Postsynaptic Potentials ◽  
Oculomotor Nerves ◽  
Stimulation Of

The isolated whole brain (IWB) preparation of the guinea pig was used to investigate the floccular modulation of vestibular-evoked responses in abducens and oculomotor nerves and abducens nucleus; for identification of flocculus target neurons (FTNs) in the vestibular nuclei and intracellular study of some of their physiological properties; to search for possible flocculus-dependent plasticity at the FTN level by pairing of vestibular nerve and floccular stimulations; and to study the possibility of induction of long-term depression (LTD) in Purkinje cells by paired stimulation of the inferior olive and vestibular nerve. Stimulation of the flocculus had only effects on responses evoked from the ipsilateral (with respect to the stimulated flocculus) vestibular nerve. Floccular stimulation significantly inhibited the vestibular-evoked discharges in oculomotor nerves on both sides and the inhibitory field potential in the ipsilateral abducens nucleus while the excitatory responses in the contralateral abducens nerve and nucleus were free from such inhibition. Eleven second-order vestibular neurons were found to receive a short-latency monosynaptic inhibitory input from the flocculus and were thus characterized as FTNs. Monosynaptic inhibitory postsynaptic potentials from the flocculus were bicuculline sensitive, suggesting a GABAA-ergic transmission from Purkinje cells to FTNs. Two of recorded FTNs could be identified as vestibulospinal neurons by their antidromic activation from the cervical segments of the spinal cord. Several pairing paradigms were investigated in which stimulation of the flocculus could precede, coincide with, or follow the vestibular nerve stimulation. None of them led to long-term modification of responses in the abducens nucleus or oculomotor nerve evoked by activation of vestibular afferents. On the other hand, pairing of the inferior olive and vestibular nerve stimulation resulted in approximately a 30% reduction of excitatory postsynaptic potentials evoked in Purkinje cells by the vestibular nerve stimulation. This reduction was pairing-specific and lasted throughout the entire recording time of the neurons. Thus in the IWB preparation, we were able to induce a LTD in Purkinje cells, but we failed to detect traces of flocculus-dependent plasticity at the level of FTNs in vestibular nuclei. Although these data cannot rule out the possibility of synaptic modifications in FTNs and/or at other brain stem sites under different experimental conditions, they are in favor of the hypothesis that the LTD in the flocculus could be the essential mechanism of cellular plasticity in the vestibuloocular pathways.

Vestibular Implants: 8 Years of Experience with Electrical Stimulation of the Vestibular Nerve in 11 Patients with Bilateral Vestibular Loss

ORL ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 227-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils Guinand ◽  
Raymond van de Berg ◽  
Samuel Cavuscens ◽  
Robert J. Stokroos ◽  
Maurizio Ranieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Vestibular Nerve ◽  
Years Of Experience ◽  
Vestibular Loss ◽  
Bilateral Vestibular Loss ◽  
Stimulation Of

Inputs from regularly and irregularly discharging vestibular nerve afferents to secondary neurons in squirrel monkey vestibular nuclei. III. Correlation with vestibulospinal and vestibuloocular output pathways

1992 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 471-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Boyle ◽  
J. M. Goldberg ◽  
S. M. Highstein
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Transition Zone ◽  
Vestibular Nucleus ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Nerve ◽  
Descending Pathways ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
Antidromic Stimulation ◽  
Vestibulospinal Tract ◽  
Irregular Afferents

1. A previous study measured the relative contributions made by regularly and irregularly discharging afferents to the monosynaptic vestibular nerve (Vi) input of individual secondary neurons located in and around the superior vestibular nucleus of barbiturate-anesthetized squirrel monkeys. Here, the analysis is extended to more caudal regions of the vestibular nuclei, which are a major source of both vestibuloocular and vestibulospinal pathways. As in the previous study, antidromic stimulation techniques are used to classify secondary neurons as oculomotor or spinal projecting. In addition, spinal-projecting neurons are distinguished by their descending pathways, their termination levels in the spinal cord, and their collateral projections to the IIIrd nucleus. 2. Monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) were recorded intracellularly from secondary neurons as shocks of increasing strength were applied to Vi. Shocks were normalized in terms of the threshold (T) required to evoke field potentials in the vestibular nuclei. As shown previously, the relative contribution of irregular afferents to the total monosynaptic Vi input of each secondary neuron can be expressed as a %I index, the ratio (x100) of the relative sizes of the EPSPs evoked by shocks of 4 x T and 16 x T. 3. Antidromic stimulation was used to type secondary neurons as 1) medial vestibulospinal tract (MVST) cells projecting to spinal segments C1 or C6; 2) lateral vestibulospinal tract (LVST) cells projecting to C1, C6; or L1; 3) vestibulooculo-collic (VOC) cells projecting both to the IIIrd nucleus and by way of the MVST to C1 or C6; and 4) vestibuloocular (VOR) neurons projecting to the IIIrd nucleus but not to the spinal cord. Most of the neurons were located in the lateral vestibular nucleus (LV), including its dorsal (dLV) and ventral (vLV) divisions, and adjacent parts of the medial (MV) and descending nuclei (DV). Cells receiving quite different proportions of their direct inputs from regular and irregular afferents were intermingled in all regions explored. 4. LVST neurons are restricted to LV and DV and show a somatotopic organization. Those destined for the cervical and thoracic cord come from vLV, from a transition zone between vLV and DV, and to a lesser extent from dLV. Lumbar-projecting neurons are located more dorsally in dLV and more caudally in DV. MVST neurons reside in MV and in the vLV-DV transition zone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document