scholarly journals Theory of Heavy Quark Energy Loss

2012 ◽  
Vol 193 ◽  
pp. 110-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pol Gossiaux ◽  
Jörg Aichelin ◽  
Thierry Gousset
2004 ◽  
Vol 93 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben-Wei Zhang ◽  
Enke Wang ◽  
Xin-Nian Wang

2011 ◽  
Vol 855 (1) ◽  
pp. 448-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sascha Vogel ◽  
Pol Bernard Gossiaux ◽  
Klaus Werner ◽  
Joerg Aichelin

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhijit Majumdar ◽  
Shanshan Cao ◽  
Chun Shen ◽  
Guang-You Qin

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M. Chesler ◽  
Mindaugas Lekaveckas ◽  
Krishna Rajagopal

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (07n08) ◽  
pp. 2072-2078 ◽  
Author(s):  
KORINNA ZAPP ◽  
GUNNAR INGELMAN ◽  
JOHAN RATHSMAN ◽  
JOHANNA STACHEL

A strong suppression of non-photonic electrons in Au + Au collisions is observed at Rhic. This is in disagreement with the expected dominance of the energy loss via gluon radiation, which predicts a much weaker suppression of heavy flavours due to the dead cone effect. However, collisional energy loss is also important, as demonstrated recently by the Soft Colour Interaction Jet Quenching model. Based on this model we show that collisional energy loss of charm quarks gives a suppression of electrons of the observed magnitude, but the contribution from beauty decays, which dominates at intermediate and large p⊥, results in a somewhat weaker overall suppression of electrons than observed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document