Design for Maintainability

10.1142/10722 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Yit-Lin Chew ◽  
Ashan Senel Asmone ◽  
Sheila Conejos
1985 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 139-146
Author(s):  
MICHAEL R. DONOVAN ◽  
WAYNE S. MATTSON

2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (30) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shubashini Ganisen ◽  
Izran Sarrazin Mohammad ◽  
L. Jawahar Nesan ◽  
Abdul Hakim Mohammed ◽  
Gunavathy Kanniyapan

Incorporating maintainability during the building design is essential to increase overall performance of the building including quality and cost as; the management and operation process of facilities can have a significant impact on cost, health and safety, energy and quality. As a result, a more effective and efficient building facility will be turned over during the post occupancy stage. Literature review reveals that there is a need to implement maintainability during the building design phase; mainly due to the increasing life-cycle cost of the building facilities. A critical review of the literature has been carried out to explore the consideration of maintainability during the building design and subsequently identifies a set of criteria and indicators to be applied during the building design phase to achieve cost effective building maintenance. Thus, this paper opted a four-round Delphi questionnaire survey to identify the relevant design for maintainability criteria and indicators to achieve cost effective building maintenance. 8 designs for maintainability criteria along with the indicators for each of the criterion have been identified. These design for maintainability indicators help the building architects to incorporate maintainability practice during the building design phase and thus help to achieve cost effective maintenance. This paper aims to address the long pending quest of incorporating maintainability during the building design phase and consequently achieve cost effective building maintenance.


2000 ◽  
Vol 24 (2-7) ◽  
pp. 203-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos ◽  
Constantinos G. Vassiliadis ◽  
Lazaros G. Papageorgiou

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila Conejos ◽  
Aristotle Ubando ◽  
Michael Yit Lin Chew

PurposeThe self-cleaning properties of nanostructured titanium dioxide facade coatings are useful in Singapore's tropical climate. However, its potential maintenance issues need to be determined right at the design stage. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the development of the design for maintainability tool which is a multicriteria design decision score sheet that evaluates the maintainability potential of nano-facade coating applications on high-rise façades with concrete and stonemasonry finishes and curtain walls.Design/methodology/approachQuantitative methods (expert and practitioner surveys) are conducted in this research study. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and sensitivity analysis were used to develop a robust Design for Maintainability tool.FindingsSafety measures indicator received the highest weighted score by experts, while the maximizing performance, minimizing risk, minimizing negative environmental impact and minimizing consumption of matter and energy were the top ranking main criteria by both experts and practitioners. The top ranked design for maintainability sub-criteria identified by practitioners and experts were risk management, maintenance considerations, climatic conditions, safety measures, lifecycle cost and maintenance access, sun's path, rainfall intensity, biological growth measures and building age profile.Originality/valueMost researches on the maintainability of nano-façade coatings uses experimentation to test the durability of nano-façade coatings, while this study focuses on design based empirical data such as establishing and ranking the list of design for maintainability criteria or indicators to minimize future defects and maintenance issues. The design for maintainability tool contributes to the maintainability of nano-façade coatings leading to maximizing its performance while minimizing cost, risks, resource consumption and negative environmental impact.


2021 ◽  
pp. 133-169
Author(s):  
Chiara Notaro ◽  
Paola Gualeni ◽  
Matteo Maggioncalda ◽  
Carlo Cau

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document