Influences of cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki) on behaviour and reproduction of Yellowstone grizzly bears (Ursus arctos), 1975 – 1989

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (11) ◽  
pp. 2072-2079 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Mattson ◽  
Daniel P. Reinhart
Keyword(s):  
Ursus Arctos ◽  
Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Spawning Season ◽  
Grizzly Bears ◽  
Oncorhynchus Clarki ◽  
Grizzly Bear ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Yellowstone Lake ◽  
Intraspecific Predation ◽  
Spawning Streams

We investigated the distribution, diet, and reproduction of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in the Yellowstone ecosystem that fed on cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki) spawning in streams tributary to Yellowstone Lake. We hypothesized that availability of trout influenced all of these factors for bears in a large part of the Yellowstone grizzly bear recovery area. Depending upon sex, bears that fed on trout used 30–45% of the recovery area. These bears concentrated within 12 km of spawning streams year-round and within 2 km of streams during the spawning season, 1 May – 15 July, when trout-eating bears mostly consumed trout. Despite use of this high-quality food, trout-eating females were apparently less fecund than other females and lost a larger percentage of their dependent young. We speculate that these cub losses resulted from higher rates of intraspecific predation by bears aggregated at spawning streams. These aggregated bears were also vulnerable to human-caused mortality, most likely due to concentrations of humans within 2 km of spawning streams during the spawning season.

Use of naturally occurring mercury to determine the importance of cutthroat trout to Yellowstone grizzly bears

2004 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 493-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura A Felicetti ◽  
Charles C Schwartz ◽  
Robert O Rye ◽  
Kerry A Gunther ◽  
James G Crock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ursus Arctos ◽  
Food Resource ◽  
Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Grizzly Bears ◽  
Grizzly Bear ◽  
Lake Area ◽  
Yellowstone Lake ◽  
Virtual Absence ◽  
Hair Mercury ◽  
Naturally Occurring

Spawning cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki (Richardson, 1836)) are a potentially important food resource for grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis Ord, 1815) in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. We developed a method to estimate the amount of cutthroat trout ingested by grizzly bears living in the Yellowstone Lake area. The method utilized (i) the relatively high, naturally occurring concentration of mercury in Yellowstone Lake cutthroat trout (508 ± 93 ppb) and its virtual absence in all other bear foods ([Formula: see text]6 ppb), (ii) hair snares to remotely collect hair from bears visiting spawning cutthroat trout streams between 1997 and 2000, (iii) DNA analyses to identify the individual and sex of grizzly bears leaving a hair sample, (iv) feeding trials with captive bears to develop relationships between fish and mercury intake and hair mercury concentrations, and (v) mercury analyses of hair collected from wild bears to estimate the amount of trout consumed by each bear. Male grizzly bears consumed an average of 5 times more trout/kg bear than did female grizzly bears. Estimated cutthroat trout intake per year by the grizzly bear population was only a small fraction of that estimated by previous investigators, and males consumed 92% of all trout ingested by grizzly bears.

A grizzly bear from the Middle Wisconsin of Woodbridge, Ontario

1976 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Churcher ◽  
Alan V. Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Ursus Arctos ◽  
Grizzly Bears ◽  
Grizzly Bear ◽  
Bone Fragment ◽  
Mammuthus Primigenius ◽  
Ursus Arctos Horribilis ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Lake Simcoe ◽  
Left Humerus ◽  
Woolly Mammoth

The distal end of the left humerus of a grizzly bear, Ursus arctos, has been recovered from above the Early Wisconsin Sunnybrook Till at Woodbridge, Ontario, from the same horizon that previously has yielded remains of the woolly mammoth, Mammuthus primigenius. The age of these specimens is estimated at 40 000–50 000 years BP, within the mid-Wisconsin, Port Talbot Interstadial. The only other recognized Canadian record of a grizzly bear east of Manitoba is from a gravel sequence at Barrie, near Lake Simcoe, Ontario, dated from a bone fragment to 11 700 ± 250 years BP. A specimen recovered in Toronto in 1913 from an Early Wisconsin horizon is also considered to represent the grizzly. Bears of the grizzly type, Ursus arctos-horribilis were present in Ontario before and after the Early and Late Wisconsin ice advances.

Predation on moose and caribou by radio-collared grizzly bears in east central Alaska

1988 ◽  
Vol 66 (11) ◽  
pp. 2492-2499 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Boertje ◽  
W. C. Gasaway ◽  
D. V. Grangaard ◽  
D. G. Kelleyhouse
Keyword(s):  
Important Implication ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
Ursus Arctos ◽  
Prey Availability ◽  
Grizzly Bears ◽  
Grizzly Bear ◽  
East Central ◽  
Specific Factors ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
Predation Rates

Radio-collared grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) were sighted daily for approximately 1-month periods during spring, summer, and fall to estimate predation rates. Predation rates on adult moose (Alces alces) were highest in spring, lowest in summer, and intermediate in fall. The highest kill rates were by male grizzlies killing cow moose during the calving period. We estimated that each adult male grizzly killed 3.3–3.9 adult moose annually, each female without cub(s) killed 0.6–0.8 adult moose and 0.9–1.0 adult caribou (Rangifer tarandus) annually, and each adult bear killed at least 5.4 moose calves annually. Grizzly predation rates on calves and grizzly density were independent of moose density and are probably more related to area-specific factors, e.g., availability of alternative foods. An important implication of our results is that managers should not allow moose densities to decline to low levels, because grizzlies can have a greater relative impact on low- than on high-density moose populations and because grizzly predation can be difficult to reduce. Grizzly bears were primarily predators, rather than scavengers, in this area of low prey availability (11 moose/grizzly bear); bears killed four times more animal biomass than they scavenged.

A study of predominant aerobic microflora of black bears (Ursus americanus) and grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in northwestern Alberta

1987 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 949-954 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. Goatcher ◽  
M. W. Barrett ◽  
R. N. Coleman ◽  
A. W. L. Hawley ◽  
A. A. Qureshi
Keyword(s):  
Soil Bacteria ◽  
Ursus Arctos ◽  
Random Distribution ◽  
Ursus Americanus ◽  
Black Bear ◽  
Black Bears ◽  
Grizzly Bears ◽  
Grizzly Bear ◽  
Streptococcus Species ◽  
Generic Composition

Swab specimens were obtained from nasal, rectal, and preputial or vaginal areas of 37 grizzly and 17 black bears, captured during May to June of 1981 to 1983, to determine the types and frequency of predominant aerobic microflora. Bacterial genera most frequently isolated from bears were Escherichia, Citrobacter, Hafnia, Proteus, Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus species, comprising about 65% of the isolates. Erwinia, Xanthomonas, Agrobacterium, Rhizobium, and Gluconobacter/Acetobacter were also isolated but at lower frequencies (< 5%). Comparison of bacterial generic composition using similarity quotient values showed no appreciable differences between grizzly and black bear flora. Also, no outstanding differences in bacterial generic composition were observed among grizzly bear samples; however, differences were noted among black bear samples. Fungal genera most commonly encountered included Cryptococcus, Rhodotorula, Cladosporium, Penicillium, Sporobolomyces, and Candida. In general, the microflora of both bear types were marked by generic diversity and random distribution. The majority of microorganisms isolated from the plant samples in the study area were also found in bear samples. This observation and the presence of certain water and soil bacteria in samples from bears suggest that the predominant microflora of both grizzly and black bears were transient and probably influenced by their foraging habits and surrounding environments.

Open-Water Movements of the Cutthroat Trout (Salmo clarki) in Yellowstone Lake After Displacement from Spawning Streams

1966 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1475-1485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence A. Jahn
Keyword(s):  
Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Open Water ◽  
Surface Currents ◽  
The Sun ◽  
Release Point ◽  
Yellowstone Lake ◽  
Random Movement ◽  
Directional Preference ◽  
Salmo Clarki ◽  
Spawning Streams

Cutthroat trout were taken from their spawning streams (June–August 1964 and 1965). A Styrofoam float was attached and fish were tracked from two release points. They moved generally shoreward (eastward). Of 120 fish tracked when the sun was visible, 68% went toward shore, 19% went away from shore, 4% showed random movement, and 8% were lost. Of 20 fish released when the sun was obscured, 30% went toward shore, 30% went away from shore, 30% showed random movement, and 10% were lost. Movement toward the eastern shoreline was less pronounced for fish liberated at a mid-lake release point. No directional preference was shown with respect to surface currents. There was no evidence that specific landmarks were used for orientation, but the sun may have served as a reference point since fish traveled farther and showed a stronger shoreward tendency on sunny days.

Changing numbers of spawning cutthroat trout in tributary streams of Yellowstone Lake and estimates of grizzly bears visiting streams from DNA

Ursus ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Haroldson ◽  
Kerry A. Gunther ◽  
Daniel P. Reinhart ◽  
Shannon R. Podruzny ◽  
Chris Cegelski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Grizzly Bears ◽  
Yellowstone Lake

Grizzly bear digging sites for Hedysarum sulphurescens roots in southwestern Alberta

1984 ◽  
Vol 62 (12) ◽  
pp. 2571-2575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne C. Holcroft ◽  
Stephen Herrero
Keyword(s):  
Discriminant Function ◽  
Discriminant Function Analysis ◽  
Ursus Arctos ◽  
Function Analysis ◽  
Soil Surface ◽  
Grizzly Bears ◽  
Grizzly Bear ◽  
Rock Fragments ◽  
Ursus Arctos Horribilis ◽  
Steep Slopes

Characteristics of sites where Hedysarum sulphurescens Rydb. roots were extensively, less extensively, or not dug by grizzly bears Ursus arctos horribilis Ord. were analyzed in relation to topographic, vegetative, soil, and geologic features. Discriminant function analysis significantly separated dug and undug sites, but did not separate extensively and less extensively dug sites. Ease of breaking the soil surface, presence of shaly rock fragments, loose cobble and gravel, and steep slopes were characteristic of dug sites. The abundance of H. sulphurescens appeared less important than the loose nature of the substrate indicating that digging time was important in optimizing energetics.

scholarly journals Estimating unrecorded human-caused mortalities of grizzly bears in the Flathead Valley, British Columbia, Canada

PeerJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. e5781
Author(s):  
Bruce N. McLellan ◽  
Garth Mowat ◽  
Clayton T. Lamb
Keyword(s):  
British Columbia ◽  
Ursus Arctos ◽  
Grizzly Bears ◽  
Grizzly Bear ◽  
Considerable Uncertainty ◽  
The Government ◽  
Reporting Rates ◽  
Gravel Road

Managing the number of grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) mortalities to a sustainable level is fundamental to bear conservation. All known grizzly bear deaths are recorded by management agencies but the number of human-caused grizzly bear deaths that are not recorded is generally unknown, causing considerable uncertainty in the total number of mortalities. Here, we compare the number of bears killed legally by hunters to the number killed by people for all other reasons, for bears wearing functioning radiocollars and for uncollared bears recorded in the British Columbia (BC) government mortality database for the Flathead Valley in southeast BC. Between 1980 and 2016, permitted hunters killed 10 collared bears and 12 (9 known, 3 suspected) were killed by people for other reasons. This ratio differed (p < 0.0001) from the uncollared bears in the government database where 71 were killed by hunters while only 10 were killed for other reasons. We estimate that 88% (95% CI; 67–96%) of the human-caused mortalities that were not by permitted hunters were unreported. The study area may have low reporting rates because it is >40 km on a gravel road from a Conservation Officer office, so reporting is difficult and there are no human residences so there is little concern of a neighbor contacting an officer. Our results are likely indicative of other places that are road-accessed but far from settlements. We discuss the implications of sampling individuals for collaring and the possible implications of wearing a collar on the animal’s fate.

Grizzly bear feeding activity at alpine army cutworm moth aggregation sites in northwest Montana

1998 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don White, Jr. ◽  
Katherine C Kendall ◽  
Harold D Picton
Keyword(s):  
National Park ◽  
Ursus Arctos ◽  
Feeding Activity ◽  
Grizzly Bears ◽  
Glacier National Park ◽  
Grizzly Bear ◽  
Use Patterns ◽  
Ursus Arctos Horribilis ◽  
Early Fall ◽  
Minimum Numbers

Grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis) consume army cutworm moths (Euxoa auxiliaris) from late June through mid-September at alpine moth aggregation sites in Glacier National Park, Montana. To better understand the importance of army cutworm moths to grizzly bears, we determined the sex and age classes and minimum numbers of grizzly bears foraging at known alpine moth aggregation sites, and documented the timing and use patterns of grizzly bears foraging in these areas. A minimum of 36 grizzly bears were observed 106 times feeding at 6 of 9 known moth aggregation sites from late June through mid-September in 1992-1995; no bears were observed on moth sites in 1993. Bears fed on moth aggregations disproportionately more at elevations >2561 m, on slopes between 31° and 45°, and on southwest-facing aspects. Lone adult grizzly bears appeared to be underrepresented and subadults overrepresented at moth sites. Moths are highly digestible; all parts are digested except for the exoskeleton. We propose that army cutworm moths are an important, high-quality, preferred summer and early-fall food for grizzly bears in Glacier National Park. We do not present any data that demonstrate an increase in the importance of moths when other foods fail.

Major components of grizzly bear diet across North America

2006 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 473-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garth Mowat ◽  
Douglas C Heard
Keyword(s):  
British Columbia ◽  
North America ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
Ursus Arctos ◽  
Nitrogen Isotope ◽  
Grizzly Bears ◽  
Grizzly Bear ◽  
Carbon And Nitrogen ◽  
Skull Size ◽  
Meat Diet

We measured stable carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios in guard hair of 81 populations of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos L., 1758) across North America and used mixing models to assign diet fractions of salmon, meat derived from terrestrial sources, kokanee (Oncorhynchus nerka (Walbaum in Artedi, 1792)), and plants. In addition, we examined the relationship between skull size and diet of bears killed by people in British Columbia. The majority of carbon and nitrogen assimilated by most coastal grizzly bear populations was derived from salmon, while interior populations usually derived a much smaller fraction of their nutrients from salmon, even in areas with relatively large salmon runs. Terrestrial prey was a large part of the diet where ungulates were abundant, with the highest fractions observed in the central Arctic, where caribou (Rangifer tarandus (L., 1758)) were very abundant. Bears in some boreal areas, where moose (Alces alces (L., 1758)) were abundant, also ate a lot of meat. Bears in dryer areas with low snowfall tended to have relatively high meat diet fractions, presumably because ungulates are more abundant in such environments. Kokanee were an important food in central British Columbia. In areas where meat was more than about a third of the diet, males and females had similar meat diet fractions, but where meat was a smaller portion of the diet, males usually had higher meat diet fractions than females. Females reached 95% of their average adult skull length by 5 years of age, while males took 8 years. Skull width of male grizzly bears increased throughout life, while this trend was slight in females. Skull size increased with the amount of salmon in the diet, but the influence of terrestrial meat on size was inconclusive. We suggest that the amount of salmon in the diet is functionally related to fitness in grizzly bears.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document