Potential use of certain parasites of brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) as biological indicators in the Tabusintac River, New Brunswick, Canada

1987 ◽  
Vol 65 (8) ◽  
pp. 1989-1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack P. Frimeth

A survey of 1146 nonanadromous and anadromous brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) from the Tabusintac River for parasites revealed 36 species of parasites, of which 18 were freshwater and 18 were marine. Most freshwater parasites were either too common or too rare in their occurrence to be of any value as biological indicators; however, Diplostomum sp. (metacercariae), Truttaedacnitis truttae, and Salmincola edwardsii were useful as indicators of foci of infection in fresh water. Decreases in prevalences of infection with marine gastrointestinal parasites in the estuary, especially Brachyphallus crenatus, Neoechinorhynchus sp., and larvae of Hysterothylacium aduncum, provided evidence for the approximate times of arrival of anadromous charr from fresh water. Marine gastrointestinal parasites were also useful as biological indicators of anadromous charr in fresh water, but these parasites were lost after varying times. High prevalences of infection with metacercariae of the marine digenean Cryptocotyle lingua resulted in a black spot condition that proved to be the best indicator of anadromous charr in fresh water. The distributions of Azygia longa, Echinorhynchus lateralis, and Zoogonus lasius from charr in the Tabusintac River as well as the nearby Miramichi and Burnt Church estuaries suggested that estuarine wanderings among adjacent river systems do occur. Tetraphyllidea gen. sp. plerocercoids from anadromous charr in the Tabusintac River were useful in identifying offshore movements of these charr into the Gulf of St. Lawrence.

1987 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 1354-1362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack P. Frimeth

A parasite survey of 1146 brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) was conducted between January 1981 and December 1982 in the Tabusintac River, New Brunswick, Canada. A total of 36 parasite species were recovered, of which 18 (one Myxosporea, two Monogenea, three Digenea, three Cestoidea, five Nematoda, one Acanthocephala, one Hirudinoidea, one Crustacea, and a Dermocystidium sp.) were freshwater and 18 (two Monogenea, seven Digenea, two Cestoidea, two Nematoda, two Acanthocephala, and three Crustacea) were marine. Anadronomous charr were differentiated from nonanadromous charr in fresh water by the presence of marine parasites. Charr in the estuary and lagoon were all considered to be anadromous; however, first-time anadromous charr or smolts were differentiated by the absence of marine parasites and infection with freshwater parasites only. New host records include Lecithaster gibbosus, Zoogonus lasius, Podocotyle angulata, Cryptocotyle lingua (metacercariae), Stephanostomum tenue (metacercariae, adults), Eubothrium crassum, Tetraphyllidea gen. sp. (plerocercoids), Eustrongylides sp. (larvae), Hysterothylacium aduncum (larvae, adults), Corynosoma magdaleni (juveniles), Argulus alosae, and Ergasilus labracis. Zoogonus lasius and Stephanostomum tenue represent new Canadian records, and Chloromyxum truttae and Truttaedacnitis truttae are reported for the first time from New Brunswick. Bulbodacnitis alpinus, previously reported only from the Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus), is considered to be a synonym of T. truttae.


1981 ◽  
Vol 59 (10) ◽  
pp. 1892-1896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoff A. Black

Changes in the numbers of metazoan parasites of anadromous brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis, during the summer 1980 were determined by examining 220 fish at different times and localities in the Moisie River, Quebec. The marine trematode Brachyphallus crenatus remained in brook charr during their movements into fresh water. Differences in the prevalence of this parasite between sampling localities in late July indicated that some charr which undergo smoltification do not go to sea although others do. Also, infection with B. crenatus enabled an estimate to be made of the percentage of charr that had been to sea entering a tributary in late August. Brook charr were also infected with Crepidostomum cooperi, Diplostomum spathaceum, Eubothrium salvelini, Proteocephalus sp., Metechinorhynchus lateralis, Echinorhynchus gadi complex, Cystidicoloides tenuissima, Hysterothylacium sp., Anisakis simplex, Acuarioidea: Seuratiinae gen. sp., Salmincola edwardsii, and glochidia larvae.


1991 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 2212-2222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-François Doyon ◽  
Christiane Hudon ◽  
Roderick Morin ◽  
F. G. Whoriskey Jr.

This study characterizes the seasonal anadromous movements of a brook charr population and compares its biological and energetic characteristics with charr spending summer in freshwaters. Downstream movements monitored at a counting fence over 3 yr were most intense in spring but occurred until fall and were positively correlated with rapid increases of water level. The timing of movements varied from year to year. Smaller charr were most subject to being swept downstream compared with freshwater residents, and most trout were concentrated near the mouth of the river. These patterns suggest that the downstream movements of charr in this system are passive. Upstream migrants had a higher condition factor and a lower tissue water content than freshwater residents, indicating that downstream movements result in a faster accumulation of energetic reserves during summer. However, the fortuitous character of anadromous migrations as well as the absence of differences in the biological characteristics (growth, size at maturity, fecundity, egg size) suggests that anadromous and resident fish belong to a single population whose yearly migrant component could be randomly determined.


1984 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 1548-1555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Magnan ◽  
Gérard J. FitzGerald

When brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill, are in allopatry in oligotrophic Québec lakes, they feed largely on macrobenthic invertebrates. However, when brook charr cooccur with creek chub, Semotilus atromaculatus Mitchill, they feed largely on zooplankton. In the present study, laboratory experiments showed that creek chub were more effective than brook charr in searching for hidden, patchily distributed prey. The searching efficiency of an individual chub feeding in a group was improved through social facilitation. In contrast, the high level of intraspecific aggression observed in brook charr prevents the formation of such feeding groups. In the laboratory, brook charr were able to displace creek chub from the food source because of interspecific aggression. Data are presented showing that chub are morphologically better adapted than charr to feed on benthos (subterminal orientation of the mouth and protrusible premaxillae), while the charr are better adapted than chub to feed on zooplankton (gill raker structure). Differences in feeding behaviour, morphology, and relative abundance between these species appear to be important in the observed niche shift of brook charr in nature.


2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (10) ◽  
pp. 2201-2210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy D. Jardine ◽  
Eric Chernoff ◽  
R. Allen Curry

Early-life history characteristics of sea-run and resident salmonid fishes that co-exist in sympatry are poorly understood. To assess differences in characteristics of offspring of these two strategies following their emergence to the stream, stable isotope ratios (δ13C and δ15N) were used to identify the progeny of resident and sea-run female brook trout ( Salvelinus fontinalis ) in a tributary of the Miramichi River, New Brunswick, Canada. Upon emergence, sea-run progeny captured in emergence traps were longer, heavier, and had higher carbon to nitrogen ratios (C/N, an indicator of lipid content) than resident progeny, but did not have a higher body condition. After some feeding and growth in the stream, sea-run progeny (still identifiable by their δ13C and δ15N) captured in dip-nets became longer, heavier, had higher C/N, and had higher condition than resident progeny. The proportion of fish caught in dip nets at sites where the two forms co-existed was dominated by offspring of sea-run females (sea-run = 56%, resident = 19%, unknown = 25%). These analyses suggest that offspring of sea-run, female trout benefit from maternally derived energy reserves gained at sea and thus have potential adaptive advantages over offspring of residents.


2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motohiro TAKAGI ◽  
Ippei SEKIYA ◽  
Ryohei SHIBAKAWA ◽  
Takaaki SHIMIZU ◽  
Ryota KAWANISHI ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document