Hydrodynamics of swimming in the water boatman, Cenocorixa bifida

Locomotion of a small water boatman (Cenocorixa bifida, Corixidae) was investigated employing high-speed cinematography and hydromechanical modelling based on a blade-element approach. The animal is propelled by the synchronous rowing action of its hind legs. The propulsive cycle consists of a power stroke and a recovery stroke phase. Force, impulse, power, and hydromechanical efficiency were calculated for a representative power stroke during which the mean body velocity was about 8 cms−1. A distinction is made between quasi-steady resistive and unsteady inertial (added mass) forces. The mean and maximum resistive thrust forces were calculated to be about 2.4 × 10−5 and 5.7 × 10−5 N per limb, respectively. By equating the total impulse of the power stroke for both legs (2.4 × 10−6 N s) with that of the drag force acting on the body over the same period, a drag coefficient of approximately 1.07 is inferred for the body. This value is comparable to those obtained for certain insects that operate at similar Reynolds numbers to C. bifida. The unsteady added mass force that acts in the forward direction is positive (propulsive) over most of the stroke with a mean value of about 1.17 × 10−5 N per limb, corresponding to an impulse of approximately 5.9 × 10−7Ns. The total propulsive mean force and impulse acting in the forward direction amount to about 3.6 × 10−5N and 1.8 × 10−6N s per limb, respectively, so the impulse of the forwardly directed added mass force amounts to about half that of the resistive thrust force. The total work and mean power associated with generating the resistive thrust were calculated to be about 6.7 × 10−7 J and 1.33 × 10−5 W per limb, respectively. Dividing the mean body drag power (1.4 × 10−5 W) by the total mean resistive power from both legs gave a hydromechanical efficiency of 0.52. When the mean inertial power associated with moving the body (2.3 × 10−6 W) and the added mass power required to accelerate and decelerate the legs (1.95 × 10−5 W per limb) are taken into account, the power stroke propulsive efficiency falls to 0.42. Taking the energy required to power the recovery stroke into account gives an overall propulsive cycle efficiency of about 0.40. This value is about twice that calculated in a previous study for drag-based pectoral fin rowing in the angelfish and reasons for this are suggested.