Predatory behaviour and prey-capture decision-making by the web-weaving spider Micrathena sagittata
Optimal-foraging theory predicts how a predator would feed most efficiently when faced with a choice of two types of prey differing in profitability and density in the habitat. The predator should focus only on the more profitable prey, since any prey item eaten by the predator has a cost in terms of the time and resources taken to subdue and eat it. A study of the hunting behaviour and prey-type selection of the web-weaving spider Micrathena sagittata (Walckenaer, 1841) (Araneae: Araneidae) in the field is documented. In the first part of the study, prey of two sizes were offered in four sectors of the web (top, bottom, right, and left). A prey item was provided at one position of the web at a time. Attack time was recorded at each position. Also, choice and no-choice tests were carried out by offering prey in opposing web sectors (top and bottom) simultaneously. Large prey were more successfully captured in the upper parts than in the bottom parts of the web. In the choice test, spiders always preferred large prey to small prey, while in the no-choice test, spiders always responded to the first stimulus received. Two different attack strategies, depending on prey size, were observed. Hunting strategies and prey-size preference can be related to the cost of web construction and profitability of the prey type.