scholarly journals The influence of predator threat on the timing of a life-history switch point: predator-induced hatching in the southern leopard frog (Rana sphenocephala)

2003 ◽  
Vol 81 (9) ◽  
pp. 1608-1613 ◽  
Author(s):  
James B Johnson ◽  
Daniel Saenz ◽  
Cory K Adams ◽  
Richard N Conner

We tested the hypotheses that potential egg predators, crayfish Procambarus nigrocinctus and dytiscid Cybister sp. larvae, would accelerate the timing of hatching and that a larval predator, dragonfly naiad Anax junius, would delay hatching in the southern leopard frog (Rana sphenocephala). We also tested the hypothesis that differences in response would be proportional to predator lethality. Our results indicate that our hypotheses were partially supported. The presence of an efficient egg predator (crayfish) induces hatching faster than a less efficient predator (dytiscid larvae). However, the presence of a larval predator (naiads) did not delay hatching. Eggs that developed in the presence of egg predators produced hatchlings that were shorter (total length) than those reared in the presence of larval predators or those reared in the absence of predators. We suggest that earlier hatching times should decrease vulnerability to egg predators but result in shorter hatchlings.

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-229
Author(s):  
James A. Erdmann ◽  
Cody D. Godwin ◽  
Martha R. Villalba-Guerra ◽  
D. Cooper Campbell ◽  
Jordan Donini ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna M. McKee ◽  
Stacey L. Lance ◽  
Kenneth L. Jones ◽  
Cris Hagen ◽  
Travis C. Glenn

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Del Giudice ◽  
Romina Angeleri ◽  
Valeria Manera

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (33-34) ◽  
pp. 2221-2242
Author(s):  
Daniel F. Hughes ◽  
Walter E. Meshaka, Jr

2013 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rayan El Balaa ◽  
Gabriel Blouin-Demers

Phenotypic plasticity allows animals to change their morphological and life-history traits when exposed to predator cues, which modifies performance and can enhance survival but engender costs. Thus, the extent of plastic changes should vary in relation to the perceived risk of predation. We tested the hypothesis that plastic changes in morphology (and their effect on performance) and life history of developing Northern Leopard Frog (Lithobates pipiens (Schreber, 1782)) larvae vary when exposed to cues of fish predators fed different diets. During development, we exposed tadpoles to control cues, cues from brown bullhead (Ameiurus nebulosus (Lesueur, 1819)) fed trout pellets, or cues from A. nebulosus fed L. pipiens tadpoles. Tadpoles exposed to predatory fish cues had smaller bodies, deeper tail fins, slower growth and development rates, and better turning performance than tadpoles that were not exposed to predatory fish cues, but we found limited evidence that the predator’s diet had an effect on phenotypic plasticity. Predator diet affected tail morphology and activity, but the latter effect was only marginally significant. Lithobates pipiens tadpoles clearly respond to predatory fish cues, but it remains unclear whether their response is modulated by the predator’s diet.


2001 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 809-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
K J Babbitt

I examined the effects of a nonlethal predator, larvae of the odonate Anax junius, and food-resource level on behaviour and growth of larval southern leopard frogs (Rana sphenocephala) to test whether the strength of effects of a nonlethal predator was influenced by background resource level. I crossed two levels of food resources, growth-limiting and non-growth-limiting, with the presence or absence of A. junius. Tadpoles responded to predators by altering spatial distribution and activity. When predators were present, tadpoles on both food treatments had similar low levels of activity, but tadpoles on the nonlimiting food treatment showed a much larger reduction in activity than tadpoles on the growth-limiting treatment. Tadpoles on both food treatments delayed metamorphosis when exposed to predators. Growth and size at metamorphosis were affected significantly by food treatment but not by predator treatment. However, the direction of response to predators differed. Tadpoles on the growth-limiting treatment were larger at metamorphosis and grew faster when exposed to predators; the opposite was true for tadpoles on the non-growth-limited food treatment. This raises the interesting possibility that for some species experiencing low resource availability, predators may induce a behaviourally mediated positive effect on growth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document