The effect of calcium and Ca antagonists upon excitation–contraction coupling

The effect of a Ca2+ -free tetraethylammonium sulfate solution on force development in short skeletal muscle fibres of the frog was investigated under voltage clamp control. Maximum force could still be reached under this condition. The removal of external Ca2+, however, caused an acceleration of force inactivation leading to a shift of the steady-state potential dependence of force inactivation to more negative potentials. With reference to the "modulated-receptor hypothesis" this result was explained by assuming a potential-dependent binding of Ca2+ to a force-controlling system in the T-tubular membrane, with a low affinity in the depolarized-inactivated state. A dissociation of Ca2+ is assumed to turn the system into a secondary inactivated state (paralysis) from which it only slowly recovers after repolarization. Ca antagonists like D600 and diltiazem accelerated the shift into paralysis, probably by an allosteric displacement of Ca2+ from its binding site. The application of 1–2 μM of the Ca antagonist nifedipine blocked the inward Ca2+ current and caused a prolongation of the transient force development following a depolarization. A similar retardation of force inactivation and a threshold shift to more negative potentials occurred when the Ca2+ chelator ethyleneglycol-bis (β-aminoethyl ether)-N,N′-tetraacetic acid (EGTA) was injected into the fibre and when in Ca2+-free solutions sodium ions entered the cell through Ca2+ channels.