Interactions among seedling diameter grade, weed control, and soil cultivation for Pinusradiata in South Africa
A study was established in the southern Cape Province, South Africa, to examine survival and growth in response to seedling grade and various methods of site preparation. Second-year performance was examined in relation to (i) initial groundline diameter, (ii) intensity of weed control, and (iii) method of soil cultivation. Weeds were controlled with (i) manual release 1 year after planting (the standard method used by the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry) or (ii) total weed control for 1 year involving the use of herbicides and additional hoeing. Soil cultivation treatments included (i) pitting by hand, (ii) pitting with a mechanical auger, (iii) ripping, and (iv) ripping plus disking. The influence of initial seedling diameter on survival was significant. Seedlings with a 2-mm groundline diameter averaged 62% survival, whereas 5-mm seedlings averaged 85% survival. Use of large-diameter stock improved survival regardless of soil cultivation or weed control treatments. For survival, there was an interaction between soil cultivation treatments and the use of herbicides. Total weed control with herbicides and hoeing improved survival for plots that received ripping or disking treatments. However, seedling survival was decreased where herbicides were used on plots where pits were used. On average, seedlings with larger diameters grew better than those with smaller diameters. However, small-diameter seedlings with total weed control grew better than large-diameter seedlings with standard weed control. Average seedling volume after 2 years was 33% greater for high-grade seedlings (2.4 dm3) than for low-grade seedlings (1.8 dm3). However, there were interactions between soil cultivation and weed control treatments for height and diameter growth. With the standard method of weed control, ripping improved height and diameter growth. Total weed control with herbicides and hoeing greatly improved growth for all treatments, and as a result, little or no differences in average seedling volume were observed between pitting and ripping treatments.